|
EDITORIAL The terrorist attacks on America shattered many myths. For one, military might or the umbrellas of security available to the nations were just not sufficient to secure a nation, any nation, against terrorism. For another, the terrorists were not deterred by, any consideration whether humanitarian or civilizational. The distance from terrorisms center, is not any protection .....more But that is not the only compromise Americans have made. After Colin Powels visit it has made another compromise of far reaching consequences. Taliban, or the so-called moderate groups within the Tailban would have a say, in the future affairs of Afghanistan. It is difficult to see where....more |
By N D Khajuria The
US volte face: India By N. B. Menon By: Uma Joshi |
|||||||||
EDITORIAL The terrorist attacks on America shattered many myths. For one, military might or the umbrellas of security available to the nations were just not sufficient to secure a nation, any nation, against terrorism. For another, the terrorists were not deterred by, any consideration whether humanitarian or civilizational. The distance from terrorisms center, is not any protection against the terrorist depredations. Nor they have sophisticated weapons. It should not be ignored that the only instrument available to the terrorists was the suicide squads. On the one hand were ready to sacrifice their lives. A person ready to lay down his or her own life is not included in the schemes of security or law and order systems. These measures presume that the perpetrator would try to escape, would try to save his or her life. That calculation is important and makes the whole security setup operable. Prevention becomes a lot more difficult, if not exactly impossible, when the security apparatus is faced with persons who are determined to kill and get killed in the process. The second is a setup that is ready to deploy these mass-destructing persons on missions. Governments are usually not as uncaring or even as resourceful as to obtain the men and women of this motivation and deploy them. They cannot get so ruthless and single minded in their strategies. What is more important the governments cannot hit and run away they are there and can be confronted. In an ordinary , confrontation these fiends would get decimated the first thing, but in a terrorist strike they can wreck havoc as the New York strikes proved. Or, as the attack on the assembly complex in Srinagar illustrated. There you have new definitions if not of strategy at least of callous disregard for life. It may well nigh be impossible for the world to tackle this type of assault. The nations of the world, therefore, need to secure the earth from this type of extreme depravity. These were the facets of terrorism that called for a total worldwide war on terrorism. All freedom-loving countries that valued that freedom readily came forward to participate in that war. Thus was the global alliance against terrorism conceived and contoured. Its primary object was not to avenge the WTC attacks. American attacks, rather, served as a symbol to open the worlds eyes as to what dangers lay there in the continuance of terrorist operations even plain existence of terrorist outfits. The grand alliance against terrorism is not to wreck the American vengeance but to secure the world from the madness of terrorism. But even before the war could get underway, America started to compromise the objectives, of this war of humanity, to capture its criminals. Roping in of the foster mother of terrorism, Pakistan, as a respectable member of this squad was the first of the unworthy compromise. America forced the world to accept. The reason was that Pakistan was needed to bring down the most explicit 'home' of terrorists, the Taliban regime. But Pakistan is whence these terrorists were bred and brought up. Their sustenance came from that quarter. Pakistan could not be a fighter against terrorism. At best, it could help and be compelled to do that practically. Instead, America has been buying logistic support from Pakistan. The country that originally slapped the menace of terrorism on the world is now a high trader of that very terrorism. Every scheme that takes it as a partner in the war on terrorism becomes a high compromise with terrorism. America showed that to get at its terrorists it would be ready even to befriend the Taliban, or Al Qaida. That could be American retribution but not a war on global terrorism. But that is not the only compromise Americans have made. After Colin Powels visit it has made another compromise of far reaching consequences. Taliban, or the so-called moderate groups within the Tailban would have a say, in the future affairs of Afghanistan. It is difficult to see where the world gets if after all this effort the Taliban can still corner a place in the future governance of Afghanistan, as representatives of Pashtoons. That in effect would be having the same regime back. And you can trust it to throw away the others in a simple show of strength. The Taliban after all did not figure in the first post-communist regime in Afghanistan, they came to occupy it. Now they will be there officially too, on the strength and sanction of the Americans. With a predictable full support of Pakistan. The effect would be to have bin Laden for American revenge, possibly Omar too. But after that it would be back to Taliban and their mentor Pakistan. Far from the scourge being wiped out of the earths face, the terrorists would not only escape punishment but would actually be rewarded for their terrorism. As Pakistan is reaping today the rewards after breeding the terrorism. Today the aid for cooperating is helping the Pak economy get back its strength and verve. The 'reward' for aiding the world war on terrorism has seen it get high from the world financial institutions. The American influx would deposit more heaps of ammunition there to foster thousands of terrorism in future. Similarly the changed American stance on Palestine and Kashmir are high incentives for more and more terrorisms to be born. Terrorism has to be wiped out from the earth. And terrorism must be made a non-paying proposition. Instead, the Americans are making the world to give in to all the demands the terrorists are making. India and Israel are not only asked to lie back but are being asked to 'accommodate' the demands of terrorists. Could there be a more effective incentive for terrorism to flourish? Twenty people gave up their lives and wrecked America. Two more could easily give up their lives and save the terrorism from meeting its deserved end. And they would have obtained all their objectives. They would also thereby ensure that the original motivations that have produced this terrorism would get strengthened by the 'war on terrorism' not be hampered by it. What war would it be, then? The single-minded obsession of Americans to get at 'their terrorists' is actually undermining this world war. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||