Mail

Fight terrorism unitedly

Sir,

Britain which was once the mightest country in the world before Ist world war has now become C-in-C (Chamcha in Chief) of United States of America. She has nothing to give world of its own. The European countries as well as America want to establish their supremacy both in Asia and Africa. They have nothing to do with the miseries of these countries. Their main aim is how to keep their position high in the world and how Asian and Afric;an countries would beg for mercy. They enjoy poverty and militancy of these countries. Present crisis of USA has on one side shown global effects of militancy and on the other side has revealed the truth that the USA as well as other European countries are anxious only of their misery caused by militancy. Their focus is only Laden and Afghanistan. India who is the highest victim of militancy is not a cause of unrest to these big guns. India has suffered 50 times more than the USA since twelve years. The main country by whom militancy is sponsored in India has become a close partner of the USA and Britain. Both these countries are offering olive branches to appease her. How India is expecting to get help to curb the militancy in the State. This not an unexpected from them as it is their policy from the very outset.

In London Tony Blair as-sured Defence Minister of India about the help in curbing the militancy in Kashmir, but in Delhi he did not even open his lips about Kashmir, militancy as he has came via Pakistan and does not want to make angry Pakistan. His focus was only on Afghanistan.

From present crisis, India has learnt a good lesson. She has understood completely the foreign policy of the USA and Britain. As such India should stand on her own legs and fight against the terrorism, single handly but it is only possible when all political parties should give up their personal interests and unite under one banner against the terrorism as they were united during independence movement.

Yours etc...
Pran Nath Pandit
Udhampur.

Denial of initial higher start

Sir,

The graduate & postgraduate teachers as per rule (10) & (12) of 370 of July 17 1987 were entitled to get the initial higher start pay & under the J&K civil service (revised pay) rules 1992 read with SRO 75 dt. 30-03-1992 rule 8 also this benefit was continued but they were deprived by the DDOs for the reasons best known to them. This rule for information of the concerned is reproduced below:

The existing provision of rule (1 0) & rule (1 2) of the Jammu & Kashmir civil services (Revised) Rules, 1987 relating to the benefit of higher starting salary advance increments for higher qualification in respect of a departments except to the extent of posts of police constables & Junior engineers. as provided in rule (d) & (f) shall remain inoperative temporarily for fresh recruits till such time orders are issued in this behalf by the Govt."

The finance Dept. later on also under OM No. A/57/87 (92)/633 dt. 15-09-1992 clarified that initial higher start salary was stopped (kept withheld) made inoperative only in respect of fresh recruitment /new appointments but unfortunately this clarification has no effect on the concerned DDOs. Therefore body of the Graduate & post graduate teachers knocked the doors of Hon'ble high court for justice & the court in its judgement dt. 27-07-1998 passed the following directions: -

" So if there was any doubt about the perspective portion or rule 8 of the revised pay rule, 1992 the same stands clarified. No judicial determination is necessary because the petitioners’ version about the scope of rule 8 has already been accepted by the Govt. However in case any individual person has been wrongly denied the higher pay scale, he alone can seek appropriate remedy & not the body or class of graduates as a whole, when there is no dispute about the interpretation of the provision. So there is no merit in this writ petition which is dismissed"

The AO director school education. Jammu rightly sent the above said judgement to all the CEOs of Jammu province for allowing initial higher start to the post graduate & graduate teachers appointed before 31-03-92 if not already given but unfortunately the financial advisor CAO of education dept. under No. EDU/Accts/Hr. start /98-99/1/50 dt. 14-12-1998 for obvious reasons only to further delay & put obstacles in the matter withdrew the instructions & AO DSEJ was also asked for immediate cancellation of the letters which was a mockery of the rule framed by the Govt. & further clarified by the finance dept. who is only competent to do so. Thus this letter has no relevance in the matter. However not taking any account of above instructions some of the DDO's provide the benefit to the eligible teachers as admissible under rule but some of the anti elements tried away the same which compelled the effected teachers to again approach the Hon’ble High court for justice & the court on 9-7-2001 passed the following judgement.

"A plain reading of rule 8 of the rules make it apparent that the benefit of rule 10 and 12 of the Jammu and Kashmir civil services (revised pay) rule 1987 releasing to the benefit of higher starting salary/advance increments for higher qualification is to be given to all departments except departments referred to in rule 9(d) and (f).

The officials of these departments are police constables and Junior Engineers. The exceptions carved out in rule 8 does not apply to teachers i.e. clause (d) of rule 9. Therefore they would be deemed to be governed by rule (8) and if they are entitled to the benefits then they can not be deprived of the same by placing reliance on the instructions noticed above."

The whole position is crystal clear and there is no reason to withhold benefits which otherwise would have been given to the concerned at the time of issue of SRO 75 Dt. 30 -03- 92. More than nine years have passed and concerned have already suffered much both mentally and financially for no fault of them as such it is hoped that some good sense shall prevail upon the concerned DDOs of the departments & they will Provide the benefits as admissible under rule to the Graduates & Post graduates teachers deprived of the same for nothing with out any further delay.

Yours etc...
B L Balwal
Udhampur