Mail

When Army plays politics -I

Sir,

In keeping with democratic conventions the world over, armed forces remain subservient to democratically elected governments. India is no exception to this tradition. Wherever this convention has been infringed, power hungry generals stifle democracies and dictatorships have perpetuated. It is not to suggest that political class is infallible. They too commit blunders but then there are inherent cheeks in democratic polity -to prevent misuse unless people themselves are politically naive. Even for worst political situations generals. have no better alternatives to offer. There is no denying the fact that our own political masters have blundered in matters paramount to our national interest but that is no excuse for armed forces to dabble in politics for soldiering and politicking are entirely different ball games.

Of late, Army top brass is making attempts to meddle in politics only to burn their fingers in the bargain. Very recently the present Army Chief publicly advocated political solution to the problem of terrorism in J&K. Such suggestions usually befit a politician but not a general, especially whose own men are thick of combat with those very terrorists with whom he advocates policy of give and take. Going a step further, he publicly not only endorsed the political decision to, declare ceasefire but, disregarding ground realities, was also the staunchest advocates of its extension. It is history now that the ceasefire turned out to be a miserable failure both at the political as well as at military plane. While the politicians wriggled out of the adverse situation with deft manoeuvering, an art they have mastered, General was left to cool his heels alone. In fact we tame surrendered the advantage we had gained over the insurgents just prior to cessation. of combat against them. It is no secret that after ceasefire there has’ been a qualitative and quantitative upsurge in insurgency in the State. In. retrospect ceasefire was a bad military decision prompted more by political expediency than any military logic.

Recently, Army again tinkered with a sensitive political issue. It organized a seminar in Jammu University, on 30th and 31st October 2001, where the participants were called upon to find solution to the J&K problem beyond the confines of diplomatic semantics. Incidentally,General Parvez Musharraf used similar expression while seeking a solution to the vexed Kashmir problem. One hopes this similarity was purely coincidental and nothing beyond. For the discerning, only options beyond India’s stated position on Kashmir, or for that matter diplomatic semantics, are either secession/independence or greater autonomy. Since state Autonomy Commission’s report has already been rejected by the Central Government, one wonders if the other option was open to debate. How one wishes that the Army top brass concentrated more on the military problem they are contending than poking into domains beyond their stated briefs. It should be a matter of concern that such exercises send signals either of paucity of ideas to fight the terrorists or of battle fatigue.

Expressing satisfaction that insurgency had not yet fully firmed in areas south of Kashmir valley or urging people to rise in self defence, that too by a general still in command, does no good to either military morale or the civilian confidence. Equally dangerous is the trend of serving military generals sharing stage with so called intellectuals whose ideographs are amply enunciated, day in and day out, as proponents for dilution of territorial integrity of our country. India has one of the finest armies in the world which is led by the best junior leaders. Let none spoil it by petty politicking for narrow personal gains.

Yours etc...
Yoginder Kandhari,
Jammu.

II

Sir,

It is in reference with the letter "Denigrating patriotic forces" published in your esteemed Daily dated November 10, 2001. The author in his appraisal of the statement of Dr. Ajay Chrangoo Chairman PK in response to the seminar, "J&K - the way ahead" organised jointly by 16 Corp of Northern Command and the Political Science Department of the Jammu University, tries to pamper the opinion of those elements who are straining every nerve to decimate the nationalistic resistance to the separatist politics.

The author has tried to take care that he does not antagonise Kashmiri Pandits and has exerted his best to justify the role of Political Science HOD by using the emotional cord of Indian army. What the commentator has conveniently forgotten is that the format of the seminar issued by the organisers included "India needs to dilute its stand to make an end to the 54 years long unresolved dispute". Don't the author and his like minded persons feel that the issued brochure and the very composition of panelists and speakers during the seminar encouraged the advocates of separatist politics to make some headway with their objectives? What has to be understood is the fact that Dr. Chrangoo represents the struggle which vibrates at the Indian patriotic frequency only. Therefore, he can not be expected to allow the fog to become denser remain mute spectator of the unhealthy rather frivolous development. He is the star attraction of the community who has given rich political content and leadership to the community vis-a-vis "Bharat Mata" building process.

It is my bounded duty to inform the author that driving back some army generals, never means to attribute the blame to the entire Indian army. What must not be lost sight of is the fact that Panun Kashmir has always weighed Indian army with high esteem and it does not thus require any sermon in this direction.

Yours etc...
Bihari Lal Koul
Bernai Jammu.