Mail

Accusation against Army

Sir,

The ridiculous accusations (Daily Excelsior, November 4) that the top army brass was politicized because of its participation in a seminar; "J&K -The Path Ahead" can only arise from an ill-opinionated, mind. It is, unfortunate, that Dr. Chrungoo has the temerity to take on the Indian army generals for their laudable intention of sharing with intellectuals of diverse shades of opinion their views on the vexed problem of terrorism and insurgency in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. By calling their patriotism into question he has done great disservice to one of the most professional, patriotic and disciplined army in the world.

We must undestand that the army is not a herd of robots without a mind and have the right to hold opinions and share views on issues that touch the very life of our nation. The country is proud of army, which has made heavy sacrifices while fighting an unconventional was in J&K for the last 12 years against an enemy armed with the deadliest weapon of religious fundamentalism. It has kept the nation inviolate against foreign aggression, helped in starving off internal subversion, and always come to the rescue of civilian authorities during natural calamities.

Yours etc...
Rajeev Mahajan
Shastri Nagar.

Past recalled

Sir,

Recently, the US has said that military operation in Afghanistan may be completed just before the advent of winter. Clearly, a sense of Urgency is in their mind and it is quite justified by the fact that general winter in Afghanistan is approaching when the terrain will become extremely difficult for American forces to handle and there is every possibility that Taliban may use "Fabian Tactics" during this time which will prolong this war considerably, adding to the American woes.

Quite naturally, the natives will be better acclimatized to the harsh winter as compared to the American forces, So the U.S will try its level best to finish off this war before the advent of general winter.

It may seem surprising but winter has proved to be the turning point of many a great battle. Two best examples can be cited: one that of Nepoleon and another that of Hitler.

In 1812, Nepoleon invaded Russia without facing any serious opposition, he reached Mascow, but found it abandoned in flames and there was no sign of Russian surrender. Finally he decided to retreat towards the France but the bitter Winter took the heavy toll of his war weary troops and almost whole of his "Grand Army" Perished in the cold. It was his most terrible and costly defeat which Ultimately led to his downfall.

Similar to the Nepoleon General, winter proved to be Hitler's worst enemy. On June 1941 Hitler invaded Russia but much to this dismay, despite pumping all of his resources and men, war exended to three Russian winter. During these winters his supplies felt short and were exhausted. Unable to bear the brunt of terrible cold and Russian onslaught German army got Vanquished and ultimately got ruined.

In the end, Russian Winter played a decisive role in Hitler's decisive loss to Russia.

In todays context, it seems that the US is not going to repeat the history fortunately which was repeated by the Hitler.

Yours etc...
Sumeer Razdan,
Kamal Nagar, Bantalab
Jammu.

Slipshod marking

Sir,

This is in reference to the letter "Check papers carefully "published in the Daily Excelsior dated November, 1, 2001. The author in the said letter has rightly pointed out the negligence of some of the evaluators which causes the failure of the students and forces them to fill in the form for re-evaluations but poor students remain failed who cannot afford fee again and again.

I am going to narrate here two such cases of negligent making in the annual examination 1999 of B.A. Part I and III of Jammu University. In the case of Miss Parul Parihar D/o Mr. Devinder Singh Parihar B.A. Part III, here answer script of education was awarded 14 marks by the evaluator but when the same script was re-evaluated by another evaluator the marks went up to 40. In another case of Miss Ranjna Devi D/o Mr. Chhaju Ram BA Part I, here answer script in Pol. Sc. was awarded 27 marks but she expected more marks and so applied for re-evaluation when the same script was re-evaluated the marks went low to 12. The candidates was declared failed in two subjects and notice was issued to cancel the admission in BA Part II. The two cases, therefore, reflect clearly that the evaluators were slipshod in their work.

Just imagine what would have happened with the candidate whose admission have been cancelled. If the candidate secured 12 marks why she was given 27 at first, and then put under a heavy economical loss, nervousness, mental conflict, dejection, disappointment and various complexes. Is it not the slaughtering of the students? Such type of negligent evaluators should be debarred from evaluation in future forever and every sober serious and honest professors/lecturers should be booked by examination wing. The suggestion of the writer for returning the re-evaluation free of the successful candidates is justified, it should be implemented.

Yours etc...
R C Khajuria
Retd. Lecturer
Surara (Patayari)
Hiranagar.