EDITORIAL

Talking responsibly

Theoretical nagging of a question, and resolving a question with all its logical imperatives in view, shouldn’t be but are two ‘different’ things. Hence there is a wide divide between the private life and public postures and politics becomes a game of high deception. That is why, say, the administrators who have been A-class pacificists during their career become hawkish commentators after they have laid down the office. That is why the reporters and sundry commentators are rarely seen to hold balanced viewpoints. That is the reason why ....more

Security checks

How many times have you passed around the civil secretariat, seen gates, side-doors and entrances on all the four sides of the highly barricaded walls and wondered why did they leave all those ‘gaps’ at the time of building when

The How Allah Conspiracy

By M J Akbar
Nothing has changed at Heathrow airport except the scowl of a security guard with a beard from Hollywood's central casting, eyes borrowed from a B-grade movie, ....
more

WTO and its impact
on Indian agriculture

By Som Dutt
India is a signatory to the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and one of the original members of the WTO (World Trade Organization). The agreement provides a framework for the long-term reforms.....
more

Post-Taliban puzzle

By M Rama Rao
The Allied war machinery is racing against time in Afghanistan to wrap up the first phase of the operations before winter sets in with all its fury and the anti-American sentiment sweeping through...
.more

EDITORIAL

Talking responsibly

Theoretical nagging of a question, and resolving a question with all its logical imperatives in view, shouldn’t be but are two ‘different’ things. Hence there is a wide divide between the private life and public postures and politics becomes a game of high deception. That is why, say, the administrators who have been A-class pacificists during their career become hawkish commentators after they have laid down the office. That is why the reporters and sundry commentators are rarely seen to hold balanced viewpoints. That is the reason why the opposition is always ready to catch at any fluff in the mind while the party, in power becomes unusually circumspect in its declarations and pronouncements. BJP’s giving up all the thorny points in its poll agenda is not the only example here. There are more striking examples in all parties and places. These come through most graphically when the parties who have presented certain policies as ‘articles of faith’ are seen to ignore them, give them short shrift or totally negate them. Thus the whole working of the two-time NF Home Minister Inderjit Gupta’s actions came as a total negation of his statements and stances as a respected pillar of the left. His tolerance of high-handed rebuff from the then UP governor Bhandari was but a small chip of this heavy cross he carried all through the year and half duration of his tenures.

Inderjit Gupta becomes a citable instance because he had spent a life of high righteousness where he consistently refused to let any speck, much less a whole of compromises land on his nose. And here he was not only a landing place for all nasty gnats but also high humiliation of having to actually eat his words uttered as home minister within the day itself. Farther east the Communists ruling there have already adopted the market economy and are proudly touting the gains West Bengal has made with this change, in paid advertisements and sponsored features in the most expensive weeklies and dailies of the nation. Yet at the national stage it is a high criticism of the liberalization, labor reforms and market capitalism. Disinvestments at Delhi are an anathema while the state is in high disinvestments-hurry. Congress is following there, like a true prevaricator. The Chief Ministers in all the Congress ruled states are pursuing economic reforms assiduously, unquestion, committedly.

The one in Rajasthan actually earned everybody's kudos for refusing to bow before the low-paid employees and finally made them see the logic of the times. Yet the same CM is totally unable to make his own party bosses politicking from Delhi see any light. There even the architect of liberalization Man Mohan Singh has gone against it. After many a summer the Mandal baiter has uttered Gandhi’s name again. Though it was to say that Mahatma’s words did not always apply. V P Singh’s return to Gandhi was a pleasant surprise and the most probable indication that the person who ‘never wanted to become the PM’ had finally given up hope of becoming PM again. It is this eventuality that finally makes the good sense dawn upon the high players on the national scene. They begin to think and speak plainly once they realize that there is no more politicking possibility left. The administrators come to speak plain when they have no more 'responsibilities' to shoulder. The newsmen shift the language depending upon which side their paper is selling or their channel is being viewed. A judge's pronouncements inside the courtroom do but rarely reflect his or her impressions out of the room and cloak. That is how the national interest, the public interest and the truth do not always coincide, here abouts. Is that why this nation continues to lack a national character?

Security checks

How many times have you passed around the civil secretariat, seen gates, side-doors and entrances on all the four sides of the highly barricaded walls and wondered why did they leave all those ‘gaps’ at the time of building when all the function they serve is to engage a guard to see that the inlets are not opened or used? The city roads that had till recently wide intense are now all lined up to leaving only narrow gap-holes through which the traffic must squeeze for a turning. Majestic entrances to office complexes, even personal residences in some cases, are all ‘filled’ up with ugly sandbags with menacing gun-barrels peeping out where warm welcoming faces were expected to look out. The receptions to the airports in the country had been 'closed’ to the public since long ago. Now the railway stations too are threatening to be closed to the "unnecessary’ persons seeing the friends or relatives off or welcoming them. It may not be long before these necessary additions’ would start getting into the very building plans. Because, we are fast getting into a full time siege.

The buses we travel in have to pass through a score of checkpoints at many of which the passengers have to get down to clear the way for the security men to have a thorough look. It is not infrequently that the security man on the look out acts less courteously, at times they even get nasty for no reason. Frequently, as one reporter wrote somewhere, they ask the men folk to alight while the women remain seated. Of course, the reporter was trying thereby to cast an unspoken aspersion on what is actually a courtesy to women. And that is the whole point. Much as our finer senses revolt at these instances it is not the security man there who is to blame for this. Most of the times it is the marauders out there who have condemned a whole people to a virtual indignity. But a greater blame lies in the society’s laxity. In its refusal to be vigilant, in its abdication of the role of a responsible citizenry. And most of the times it is to secure this lax, irresponsible citizen that the whole nuisance to the people as well as the agencies is caused. The least the society can do is to be a little more patient. Possibly more vigilant, and responsible, too.

The How Allah Conspiracy

By M J Akbar

Nothing has changed at Heathrow airport except the scowl of a security guard with a beard from Hollywood's central casting, eyes borrowed from a B-grade movie, and an attitude that is from honest, genuine, home-grown, indigenous stupidity. So far all the checkpoints of one of the world's busiest airports, manned by governemnt, have been cool, professional and cheered up by a little smile at the end. After the breee the barrier. This man is not government; he is airline security, out sourced, standing at the boarding gate of the Virgin flight from London to Boston (Boston!). He looks at my Muslim name on the passport and shuffles his shoulders in what Bertie Wooster would have called a marked manner. He clearly believes that his moment in history has arrived. Open your bag, he orders.

Decision time. Glare back? I put my bag in front of him and turn my back to chat pleasantly with the slightly-embarrassed Virgin (or not) ground stewardess who has welcomed me pleasantly enough. Keeping my role model in such circumstances. Bertie Wooster, firmly in focus, I babble about why I was the last person to board; didn't ummm hear the announcement, was trying internet in the lounge which did not work, confused Gate 34 with Gate 4 before being rescued, all of it partially true. Defeated by my chatty indifference, the Guardian of the West returned my passport with limp hand and limp eyes, unable to understand why a Muslim travelling to Boston should not want to blow himself up. In all fairness I should add that I had taken the precaution of disguise. I was wearing an elegant silk tie. When has anyone wearing an elegant silk tie, with a Windsor knot, ever hijacked anything? I challenge you to find a single instance.

My preassigned seat on flight VS011 is occupied. Two Asians presumably wanting to travel together, and perhaps attracted by the extra legspace in the front row, have trespassed on one of the seats. The upper class is full and they try to postpone the inevitable with bluster. There is nothing like having the law on your side to get your way. In a few minutes a friendly voice informs us through the intercom tha anyone in the economy section of the aircraft who wants to stretch out and sleep by lifting the arrests dividing seats is welcome to do so. There are enough empty seats. This is the second law of travel in the post September 11 era. The ladies and gentlemen on company expense with laptops are edgy in the crowded front, as they have to go where they have to go. Those who travel for pleasure are taking their pleasures at home.

From the sky America looks serene, beautiful, rich, imperturbable. New England is as rich and serene as America gets. Boats skim past rocky outcrops that guard the north Atlantic coast of God's preferred continent, confirming the Brahmin status of Boston. The serently is infectious. A mild flutter interrupts the mood as we land from over the sea. Please keep your passport in your hands for inspection at the exit. This is obviously a new security procedure. No problem. A large policeman with an Irish twinkle glances at my three-tier passport and asks what I do. Sir,

Journalist. He beams. This is unusual, Journalists are not always considered good news. About ten feet away, a large lady at immigration is not so sanguine about either journalists or Muslims. She takes only a few seconds to make up her mind after taping my name on her computer. ''We may have to ask you a few more questions. Sir.'' They never forget the Sir. Decision time again. The options juggle through my mind. How should one respond? Grovel? Rage? Try the sniffy is this the America-I once knew tactic ?

I finally do what comes automatically. I shrug and say sure. A fleeting vision of interrogation cells appears in the imagination but reality is better. We stop at a vacant stand-up counter. Nothing so dramatic as a padded cell. When you are reconciled calm prevails. I take a seat on the bench and open a copy of Spectator. Soon, a thin-faced policeman fills the space at the counter and examines my passport which has been put into a plastic bag with gingerly fingers. I stick to the Spectator. From behind me my friendly Irishman suddenly reappars to tell thinface with a big grin : ''He's all right. He's reading the Spectator''.

Thinface replies with a smile of his own, and all is right with the world again. I ask my personal Irish saviour how he reads the Spectator in Boston. On the internet, he explains grandly.

So now you know what to do on your next flight to Boston. Wear a silk tie with a Windsor knot at Heathrow and read the Spectator in Boston. If the first doesn't save you, the second will.

Winter, said the television weatherwoman on Thursday morning, was due in three hours. They can get very specific on American television in their constant search for the truth. Such experts are encouraged of course by the fact that in three hours everyone will either forget, forgive or simply not care. If this was the end, summer was saying goodbye like a diva at the top of her form, dressed in the plumes of Paradise. The sun was softened and melted over the streets, complementing the cool breezes of impending change. The local citizens were out enjoying the sun in the afternoon unhurried and gossipy. Boston has the intimacy of a small town and the confidence of a large city. The placid Charles river bisects the city, nursing the world's most famous educational institutions on one side and commerce on the other when I leave Boston to travel north towards Dartmouth- and New Hampshire, the world along the way has become a dance. How many colours are there in brown? In red? In russet? In yellow? In green? In orange and lilac and peach? The trees along the road and across the hillside are an endless feast as they burst into colour before the montone of winter, a riot, a whirl, an impossible orchestra conducted by nature in some frenzy of joy. If one has to die then this is the way to go. This is the last burst of colour even as the leaves begin to fall and branches turn bare to take the weight of snow on their thin limbs; soon, all will be white on the frozen ground and dark grey against the freezing sky.

But summer has not lost out yet, no matter what the television says. In the forests that stretch beyond the magnificient campus of Dartmouth College, you may not be able to hear a leaf fall in the silence, but you can hear the leaves, shiver as they comfort one another on the glade that is their graveyard.

I am a guest of Dartmouth College and put up at the campus hotel. Hanover Inn. A Halloween pumpkin sits on the reception; America brings in winter with a great, eerie, fun, foreboding festival. There is a fire in the lounge, and impressive books wait for readers with time. Charm and hospitality are all around you. My mobile has stopped roaming, unable to pick up a local host, which adds significantly to the peace. At the lecture I deliver in the afternoon, the students are less generous than the sprinkling of faculty and guests interested in a particular understanding of the history of Islam and South Asia. This is as it should be. The report in The Dartmouth (America's Oldest College Newspaper. Founded 1799) about this talk is remarkable for its accuracy and concise perception. Sadly none of these brilliant young men and women will become journalists. They want to conquer Wall Street Instead.

The train taking me south starts form a track-level platform at White River Junction. In Verment, across the water that forms the border with New Hampshire. It stops at similar sidewalks to pick up Real America from its small towns, and take it to New York, a city that belongs as much to the rest of the world as it does to America. They say that New York has become a kinder, gentler lace since 11 September, when the contestants of its permanent rat place sat back to consider what exactly they were racing for. Three thousand divorce applications were withdrawn within twenty-four hours of 11 September. New York has taken another look at the mirror and found, at least for a while, the family.

The first important bulletin I got from the local war zone- and in this city, it means the economic battlefield is that the United States has begun pursuit and assault against the economic routes of terrorism. Trace the money and get your man. Sounds sensible. The talk shows are full of this second conflict now that the bombing of Afghanistan has slipped into a repetitive mode with not much forward action. How many times can you say that America launched its heaviest raids on Kandahar today? Television also needs visuals. Between the Pentagon and the Taliban, there isn't much footage available.

A government type in suit and the appears on the screen to discuss the money supply lines of the enemy. He seems particularly interested in a transaction called ''How Allah''. I wonder what God has to do with money laundering. The expert notes that ''How Allah'' is an established Indian practice; this is the way Indians transfer their money illegally and, amazingly, they put nothing down on paper. He looked both bemused and perplexed.

It was then that the rupee dropped.

''HowAllah'' was not a nefarious Islamic fund-transfer ritual practised between conspiring mullahs. He was talking about ''havala'', that old and familiar method by which loaded Indians fund their needs and pleasures abroad despite the fact that you cannot officially convert the rupee into dollars for such purposes. Now, this is a great story. The United States is going to solve a problem that the government of India has tried to solve for decades and quietly given up on. The FBI is going to pulverise those networks. I can hear the sound of chattering teeth from Kolkata to Mumbai via Delhi. We could see the emergence of a new Indian economy, thanks to the FBI, which already has offices in India, Incidentally.

I always knew it would take nothing less than a world war to tackle the moneybags of India.
Twenty First Century Media.

WTO and its impact on Indian agriculture

By Som Dutt

India is a signatory to the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and one of the original members of the WTO (World Trade Organization). The agreement provides a framework for the long-term reforms in agricultural trade and domestic policies to move towards market- oriented agricultural trade. The obligations and disciplines incorporated in the agreement on agricultural trade include market access, domestic support, export competition/subsidy, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, and trade-related intellectual property rights (TRIPs).

In the area of export competition, the WTO agreement calls for reducing direct export subsidies to a level-of 36 per cent, below the 1986-88 level in developed countries over a period of 6 years and the quantity of subsidized exports by 21 per cent, covering the same period. The Indian exports of agricultural commodities do not get direct export subsidy. Most of the developed countries operate export-subsidy programmes to enhance their exports. They would be required to gradually reduce their export-assistance programmes. And this would open up new market for countries like India. If we are efficient producers of agricultural products, we would benefit not only from improved market access opportunities in the developed and developing countries but also from the reduction of subsidized exports and trade -distorting production incentives in developed countries.

The recent spurt in agricultural exports and their diversification from tea and coffee to items like fish products, cashew kernel, oilcakes, rice, fruits and processed foods confirm that Indian agriculture sector enjoys comparative advantage, says Dr R S Paroda, former Director-General, ICAR. However, countries like India should tread carefully and, while responding to WTO opportunities in agricultural trade, the policy of self-sufficiency in foodgrains production should not kept aside.

The agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary measures lacks specific guidelines. Thay may be because of differences in geographical and sanitary conditions prevailing in different countries. However, the agreement calls for harmonization equivalence and transparency to sanitary and phytosanitary regulations under the overall umbrella of the FAO’s Codex Alimentatious.

The Intellectual Property Rights (IPRS) regime requires extending patent protection the processes as well as product innovation in all fields including agriculture. India has opted for sui generis system for protection of plant varieties confirming the criteria of novelty, distinctiveness, unformity and stability. There is explicit provision for protection of farmers knowledge and rights to save and exchange their farm- saved seed, and option to also grant a compulsory license. The bill on plant variety protection has been introduced in the Parliament. It is presently under the scrutiny of a select committee and is awaiting clearance.

Intellectual Property Rights were used to reduce India’s huge consumerist class and commercial collaborators. In short, the TRIPs became the new open sesame password, using which the Constitutional provision of our Secular Socialist Democratic Republic would be facto be nulified and privatization, with a giant stride for transnational big business, would become the unwritten economic constitution.

The economic interest of the States have been in peril, agricultural and industrial development has been in jeopardy and even judicial supremacy under challenge from January 1, 1995 where the WTO took authority under its grand global jurisdiction, with its pro-North tilt.

Will our rulers trade our freedom in the guise of free trade? The time to protest is late. There is a wide enough space to preserve intact our existing patent law, having due regard to the national urgencies and social realities and Constitutional mandates of the people. These are paramount considerations for the Government and Parliament so that India may not buckle under foreign corporate pressure and, at the same time, with a vision, expand the articles in the treaty for not forsaking the people of India.

It must be realized that domestic reforms are the pre- requisites for India to consolidate the gains from the WTO framework regarding agriculture. In several export-oriented commodities, India enjoys comparative advantage. However, this inherent advantage is slipping on account of fatigue of green revolution in certain areas and difficulties in raising productivity in the vast rainfed areas. Therefore, productivity- lead growth holds the key to cost competitiveness. This places an increased emphasis on the development of technologies with suitable changes in research agenda of the National Agricultural Research System (NARS). Concerning market access, the objective of food security must govern and dictate actions as India will continue to address the interest of small and marginal farmers in the future, according to a report in the ICAR Reporter.

A number of other Ministers have spent varying periods in Jail for their misconduct. This is the state of affair in the second most populous State in the country, where millions, do not have food, water, shelter, medicine and education. A political office, has become a kind of insurance, against the State, moving against such people, for any crime,they may have committed.It also ensures, a lavish life style, at the cost of State Exchequer. Most States in the country are facing financial crisis. The latest earthquake has added a burden of Ra. 25,000 crore to the Nation. The most important thing to be ensured in such matters is that the money is spent to ameliorate the lot of people and not siphoned away.

Simple living and high-thinking have been sacrificed at the cost of appeasement and sticking on to the office at any cost. In fact, most Chief Ministers have come to the conclusion that it is futile even to talk about austerity. While the States pay through its nose for the luxuries enjoyed by the Bureaucrats, Ministers and Legislators, it is the man in the street, who has to bear, the entire burden ultimately.

Surely, this cannot mean by any stretch of imagination, that the Governments, run by such people, are of the people,or for the people. it is overdue now, to have a system, which can bring the wrongdoers to book, without being influenced by any string pulling. The present system gives the impression of almost asking the chief to guard the house. It needs to be replaced, by those, who care for the house. Only constant Vigilance on the part of all the inmates of the house, that is India, can ensure that nobody louts it with impunity.
PTI Feature

Post-Taliban puzzle

By M Rama Rao

The Allied war machinery is racing against time in Afghanistan to wrap up the first phase of the operations before winter sets in with all its fury and the anti-American sentiment sweeping through most of the Muslim world becomes a tidal wave of sorts. That is why the focus of attention is as much on the war theatre as on behind the scene operations aimed at cobbling up a new regime to replace the Taliban.

In the ultimate analysis, what matters in Afghanistan is a political solution, not aerial strikes that are not dazzling the TV screens like at the time of Gulf war. More over, there is very little of tactical relevance to aerial bombardment in a country devastated by close to a quarter century of war and war-lordism.

Yes, there is this real threat from the Stingers and SAMs left behind after the war against the Red Army. But there are heard, not seen in action as yet. It is possible, the Taliban were conserving their strength for a ground operation.

There is much for the US and its Western allies to learn "from the Soviet experience. The Red Army had lost the " war not because they had less firepower but because they had failed to win over warlords and tribal chiefs. The Allies will also do well to learn from the experience of Pakistan, which has manipulated its way to the seat behind the throne in Kabul. In a way, what Osama did with the Taliban was to replicate the Pakistan example of creating a loyal band through cash incentives, and pay offs and privileges.

Reports from the front line tell us that the Americans are doing this precisely. How far they would be successful time alone will tell. The fact that rumblings are being heard from the Northern Alliance (NA) against the American scheme of things shows that the gamble has not yet paid off.

With accretions to its ranks, the NA has become more broad based. Today, it can boast of several Pashtun commanders. Them is unity of purpose that has come the hard way. But they cannot be expected to "co-habit with the Taliban. Forcing their hand exposes an ignorance of the history of the region. And of course, gives the veto power to the Pakistani establishment. Even by default this should not be facilitated if the end objective is checkmating the Islamists.

Northern Alliance has its weaknesses. No denying. Abdul Rashid Dostum and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf are not the ideals for any. Dostum has a ruthless streak that was in full display in the early nineties. Sayyaf is no moderate either. Arab money and Arab volunteers have watered his conservatism. Gulbudin Hekmatyar’s outfit is extremist Hezb-e-Islami. And he is very strident in his opposition to the Taliban.

Dostum can be counted to continue to show a willingness to sit across the table with the New Taliban and share power in the Post-Osama, Post - Omar phase. Not others. Nor their backers. Since there can be no military solution involving a race that has defiance writ large on its face, Washington will do well to come down from its self anointed high position and involve all the stake holders in a peaceful, progressive and stable Afghanistan.

In the past couple of weeks, there is renewed talk of holding a conclave of traditional chiefs, religious scholars, and war - lords to secure backing for formal return of exiled King Zahir Shah to Kabul. He has thrown a spanner into the American works by declaring that he is not interested in the restoration of his monarchy. In a sense it is a wise move. Since he was deposed in the late seventies, Afghanistan has witnessed several changes. There has come a generation, which has no memories of the Royalty.

So what type of representative government the King has in mind is not clear. He may like his grandson, who is in his thirties to be in the forefront. It is not going to be to the liking of Pakistan, which was ill-at ease with the King himself during his reign in the sixties and the early seventies. More over, it is doubtful whether the loya jirga as the conclave is known locally, can be convened before the winter sets in and covers the country under a thick blanket of ice. Till date, there is no agreement on who should be invited and who should be left out.

At this stage, one thing is clear. The US cannot afford to bank only on Pakistan. It has to lean equally on Iran, India, Russia and adjoining CIS states like Uzbekistan. What role the US assigns them will determine the shape of things to come. Only a regional action plan will make the difference for today and tomorrow.

We know the position of India, Russia and CIS countries. Iran is a party to the New Delhi-Moscow axis. But can it fit into the Post - Taliban puzzle given the level of animosity between Tehran and Washington for over two decades. Minus Iran, is stability possible?

Reports in the Middle East press show there is no room for despondency, as some delicate diplomatic manoeuvring seems under way far removed from the spotlight. Within hours of the first air strikes on Oct. 8, Iran had conveyed to the Bush administration through the Swiss government that they would rescue and protect any American military personnel who got stranded inside their borders.

The offer followed a 'discreet meeting' between the US and Iranian officials in Geneva. Who made the first move for a thaw in a rozen relationship is not important. The Americans appear to have taken the initiative through the British to befriend the supreme ruler Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Because presence of Iran on the US side on the anti-terrorism plank and in the post-Taliban phase is a coup d'etat undoubtedly.

The US Justice Department is trying to end a class-action lawsuit brought against Iran by the 52 Americans held hostage for 444 days during the Carter era in the year 1979-80. Just to ''protect the nation's foreign policy and national security interests generally''. Certificate from the USAID for Iran's role in alleviating the hardship of Afghan refugees and Iran's willingness to the delivery of US food aid through its territory to Afghanistan are a natural corollary.

Washington, given its firepower and financial muscle will have to foot the bill of rebuilding Afghanistan. The anti-dote to fundamentalism and all the ills that go with it is development and a caring administration. The months ahead offer an opportunity to the United States to pay for its past sins.

As Edward Girardet, Editor of the Essential Field Guide to Afghanistan, and a director of Geneva based Media Action International, observes, during the Soviet occupation of Kabul, Washington provided about $3 billion worth of aid to the Afghan resistance groups, through Pakistan. Much of this was creamed off by the Pakistani military, with the bulk of the remaining aid channelled to extremist groups dominated by Pashtuns. CIA was aware of what was happening on the ground but just turned a blind eye even after the Soviets beat a retreat with bruised ego in 1989 and the ISI paved the way for the Taliban's triumphant march into Kabul seven years later in 1996.

The point is the US cannot afford to display a benign neglect of Afghanistan once again. Nor can it allow Pakistan to regain a toe-hold to pursue its strategic depth policy, which is primarily responsible for the mess the world finds itself in today.

Whether Washington plays its Good Samaritan role through the United Nations or a consortium of neighbour is a matter of detail. The need for aid is massive, indeed. Such aid is not philanthropy. Relief agencies estimate that some six million Afghans, roughly a third of the population, are in dire straits. Nature's fury in the form of drought the Taliban's quixotisms, and now the New War have brought untold miseries to them. They are in no position to bear further hardship.

In the words of S Frederick Starr, Chairman, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute (Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington), the real US role in Afghanistan is about to begin. Because it is poverty and ignorance that have allowed religious and ethnic strife to sprout. Throwing out ''terrorism regime'' is only the first step. True, reconciling conflicting interests, and installing a viable, acceptable government are going to be a time consuming exercise. So will be the pulling down of all the Taliban structures like poppy cultivation and the Moral Police. Patience, endurance and preseverance should remain the guiding principles in the interregnum. The UN appears to be cut out for this 'balancing' role.
--Syndicate Features

US caught up in a quandary

By:- Prof M L Raina

After the dismemberment of the Soviet Union, the US rejoiced for having become the sole super power. It acted like the world's supercop, swaying its commanding baton to keep the world under its thumb, throwing a frown here and a smile there as its own interests dictated. Like the fabled King Ozymandias of Egypt, it slightingly proclaimed, "I am Ozymandia's (read US), the King of Kings/look at my works, you mighty, and despair". It took its invincibility (The attribute of God alone) for granted because its cup of pride was filled to the brim. Little did it know that one day it would be caught itself in a shattering quandary.

The attack on the twin trade towers and the Pentagon took the wind out of the swollen sails of the US Government. The unexpected attack came like a thunderbolt and smashed the nation's pride to smithereens, and exploded the myth of invulnerability with a bang. The whole nation was benumbed and traumatised. Nervousness was manifest everywhere on the American soil. This was because of the foolishly conceived nation of invulnerability.

No heed was paid to acts of terrorism in some parts of the world because presumably, the terrorists had the US-government's Covert blessings. Nearer home, India has time and again invited American Government's attention to the Pak sponsored cross border terrorism which has destroyed thousands of lives. But every time the US has looked the other way, or at best offered cosmetic treatments. Here also it wanted to keep the cauldron of turmoil boiling in South Asian region also for its long term interests. It has been talking about the safety of human rights. But human rights for whom? Certainly for the citizens of America. Isn't the US conscious of the ethnic cleansing, effected by the terrorists, of the minority Hindu community-The community of Kashmiri Pandits who were hounded out at gun point from Kashmir? Was this not a violation of the KPs human rights? Yes, but for the hypocritical US, 'No' India's integrity and solidarity have been under constant threat for about fifteen years now because of terrorism, and India persistently expressed its genuine fears that if the transborder terrorism was not effectively dealt with its would spread like cancer to other parts of the world. These fears have come true. But the US Government made light of this fast spreading menace.

What is the position now? The monster of terrorism reached the door steps of the US, causing colossal damage both material and psychological. The shock waves were too intense to be borne. The saying "The higher you rise, the harder you fall" applies appropriately to the United States. Terrorism, whose seeds were sown by the American Government has now hit back like a boomerang and with virulence. After being shaken exceedingly by tasting the bitter fruit of terrorism the US Government started realising that India's forebodings were not in vain, but the irony is that it has yet to decide whether the transborder terrorism should be halted or not. It is because it can't displease the military rulers of Pakistan who have their compulsions of playing the Kashmir card for domestic consumption. The US allows this because it has played the game of give and take with Pakistan. Pakistan who faced sanctions from America which have now been expediently lifted because the former has followed has allowed air space and ground bases to be used by the latter.

America came under attack and started groaning (read weeping) with pain why should not this have happened. It was justified in crying with pain because only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches. Its own skin, delicate skin for that, was touched and so it made frantic appeals to friendly countries for fighting together and rooting out terrorism from the globe (read America). It is using others for its own interests.

President Bush has vowed "make no mistake about it" to wipe out terrorism from all parts of the world. How far he will succeed, time only will show.

In desperation America has been bombing Afghanistan right and left without much success so far. It is looking for bin Laden who has sufficient tenacity, tactic and power to outwit any person, however powerful he may claim to be. He is well versed with the rugged terrains of Afghanistan and its deep maze of ravines. It is as impossible to look for him as to look for a needle lost in a haystack.

Mailing of anthrax to various places in America has added a dangerously new dimensions to the Afghan war. This is a real and extremely potent bio-weapon. It has perplexed the public and Government agencies. All are at a loss to know how to go about stopping this type of warfare. The various intelligence agencies are feverishly working out plans to find the source of this deadly anthrax, but so far there has been no breakthrough. The situation for a common man seems to be going out of control.

It America had adopted the policy of live and let live, things might not have come to such a pass. The whole seems to be endangered by the biological war which may assume alarming propositions, engulfing mostly innocent people. If the US Government reviews its foreign policy and tries to remove the basic cause of terrorism and try to bring peace, the world might heave a sigh of relief. Discretion is definitely the better part of valour.

 



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |