EDITORIAL
Talking responsibly
Theoretical nagging of a
question, and resolving a question with all its logical
imperatives in view, shouldnt be but are two
different things. Hence there is a wide
divide between the private life and public postures and
politics becomes a game of high deception. That is why,
say, the administrators who have been A-class pacificists
during their career become hawkish commentators after
they have laid down the office. That is why the reporters
and sundry commentators are rarely seen to hold balanced
viewpoints. That is the reason why the opposition is
always ready to catch at any fluff in the mind while the
party, in power becomes unusually circumspect in its
declarations and pronouncements. BJPs giving up all
the thorny points in its poll agenda is not the only
example here. There are more striking examples in all
parties and places. These come through most graphically
when the parties who have presented certain policies as
articles of faith are seen to ignore them,
give them short shrift or totally negate them. Thus the
whole working of the two-time NF Home Minister Inderjit
Guptas actions came as a total negation of his
statements and stances as a respected pillar of the left.
His tolerance of high-handed rebuff from the then UP
governor Bhandari was but a small chip of this heavy
cross he carried all through the year and half duration
of his tenures.
Inderjit Gupta becomes a
citable instance because he had spent a life of high
righteousness where he consistently refused to let any
speck, much less a whole of compromises land on his nose.
And here he was not only a landing place for all nasty
gnats but also high humiliation of having to actually eat
his words uttered as home minister within the day itself.
Farther east the Communists ruling there have already
adopted the market economy and are proudly touting the
gains West Bengal has made with this change, in paid
advertisements and sponsored features in the most
expensive weeklies and dailies of the nation. Yet at the
national stage it is a high criticism of the
liberalization, labor reforms and market capitalism.
Disinvestments at Delhi are an anathema while the state
is in high disinvestments-hurry. Congress is following
there, like a true prevaricator. The Chief Ministers in
all the Congress ruled states are pursuing economic
reforms assiduously, unquestion, committedly.
The one in Rajasthan
actually earned everybody's kudos for refusing to bow
before the low-paid employees and finally made them see
the logic of the times. Yet the same CM is totally unable
to make his own party bosses politicking from Delhi see
any light. There even the architect of liberalization Man
Mohan Singh has gone against it. After many a summer the
Mandal baiter has uttered Gandhis name again.
Though it was to say that Mahatmas words did not
always apply. V P Singhs return to Gandhi was a
pleasant surprise and the most probable indication that
the person who never wanted to become the PM
had finally given up hope of becoming PM again. It is
this eventuality that finally makes the good sense dawn
upon the high players on the national scene. They begin
to think and speak plainly once they realize that there
is no more politicking possibility left. The
administrators come to speak plain when they have no more
'responsibilities' to shoulder. The newsmen shift the
language depending upon which side their paper is selling
or their channel is being viewed. A judge's
pronouncements inside the courtroom do but rarely reflect
his or her impressions out of the room and cloak. That is
how the national interest, the public interest and the
truth do not always coincide, here abouts. Is that why
this nation continues to lack a national character?
Security checks
How many times have you
passed around the civil secretariat, seen gates,
side-doors and entrances on all the four sides of the
highly barricaded walls and wondered why did they leave
all those gaps at the time of building when
all the function they serve is to engage a guard to see
that the inlets are not opened or used? The city roads
that had till recently wide intense are now all lined up
to leaving only narrow gap-holes through which the
traffic must squeeze for a turning. Majestic entrances to
office complexes, even personal residences in some cases,
are all filled up with ugly sandbags with
menacing gun-barrels peeping out where warm welcoming
faces were expected to look out. The receptions to the
airports in the country had been 'closed to the
public since long ago. Now the railway stations too are
threatening to be closed to the "unnecessary
persons seeing the friends or relatives off or welcoming
them. It may not be long before these necessary
additions would start getting into the very
building plans. Because, we are fast getting into a full
time siege.
The buses we travel in
have to pass through a score of checkpoints at many of
which the passengers have to get down to clear the way
for the security men to have a thorough look. It is not
infrequently that the security man on the look out acts
less courteously, at times they even get nasty for no
reason. Frequently, as one reporter wrote somewhere, they
ask the men folk to alight while the women remain seated.
Of course, the reporter was trying thereby to cast an
unspoken aspersion on what is actually a courtesy to
women. And that is the whole point. Much as our finer
senses revolt at these instances it is not the security
man there who is to blame for this. Most of the times it
is the marauders out there who have condemned a whole
people to a virtual indignity. But a greater blame lies
in the societys laxity. In its refusal to be
vigilant, in its abdication of the role of a responsible
citizenry. And most of the times it is to secure this
lax, irresponsible citizen that the whole nuisance to the
people as well as the agencies is caused. The least the
society can do is to be a little more patient. Possibly
more vigilant, and responsible, too.
|
The
How Allah Conspiracy
By M J
Akbar
Nothing
has changed at Heathrow airport except
the scowl of a security guard with a
beard from Hollywood's central casting,
eyes borrowed from a B-grade movie, and
an attitude that is from honest, genuine,
home-grown, indigenous stupidity. So far
all the checkpoints of one of the world's
busiest airports, manned by governemnt,
have been cool, professional and cheered
up by a little smile at the end. After
the breee the barrier. This man is not
government; he is airline security, out
sourced, standing at the boarding gate of
the Virgin flight from London to Boston
(Boston!). He looks at my Muslim name on
the passport and shuffles his shoulders
in what Bertie Wooster would have called
a marked manner. He clearly believes that
his moment in history has arrived. Open
your bag, he orders.
Decision
time. Glare back? I put my bag in front
of him and turn my back to chat
pleasantly with the slightly-embarrassed
Virgin (or not) ground stewardess who has
welcomed me pleasantly enough. Keeping my
role model in such circumstances. Bertie
Wooster, firmly in focus, I babble about
why I was the last person to board;
didn't ummm hear the announcement, was
trying internet in the lounge which did
not work, confused Gate 34 with Gate 4
before being rescued, all of it partially
true. Defeated by my chatty indifference,
the Guardian of the West returned my
passport with limp hand and limp eyes,
unable to understand why a Muslim
travelling to Boston should not want to
blow himself up. In all fairness I should
add that I had taken the precaution of
disguise. I was wearing an elegant silk
tie. When has anyone wearing an elegant
silk tie, with a Windsor knot, ever
hijacked anything? I challenge you to
find a single instance.
My
preassigned seat on flight VS011 is
occupied. Two Asians presumably wanting
to travel together, and perhaps attracted
by the extra legspace in the front row,
have trespassed on one of the seats. The
upper class is full and they try to
postpone the inevitable with bluster.
There is nothing like having the law on
your side to get your way. In a few
minutes a friendly voice informs us
through the intercom tha anyone in the
economy section of the aircraft who wants
to stretch out and sleep by lifting the
arrests dividing seats is welcome to do
so. There are enough empty seats. This is
the second law of travel in the post
September 11 era. The ladies and
gentlemen on company expense with laptops
are edgy in the crowded front, as they
have to go where they have to go. Those
who travel for pleasure are taking their
pleasures at home.
From the
sky America looks serene, beautiful,
rich, imperturbable. New England is as
rich and serene as America gets. Boats
skim past rocky outcrops that guard the
north Atlantic coast of God's preferred
continent, confirming the Brahmin status
of Boston. The serently is infectious. A
mild flutter interrupts the mood as we
land from over the sea. Please keep your
passport in your hands for inspection at
the exit. This is obviously a new
security procedure. No problem. A large
policeman with an Irish twinkle glances
at my three-tier passport and asks what I
do. Sir,
Journalist.
He beams. This is unusual, Journalists
are not always considered good news.
About ten feet away, a large lady at
immigration is not so sanguine about
either journalists or Muslims. She takes
only a few seconds to make up her mind
after taping my name on her computer.
''We may have to ask you a few more
questions. Sir.'' They never forget the
Sir. Decision time again. The options
juggle through my mind. How should one
respond? Grovel? Rage? Try the sniffy is
this the America-I once knew tactic ?
I finally
do what comes automatically. I shrug and
say sure. A fleeting vision of
interrogation cells appears in the
imagination but reality is better. We
stop at a vacant stand-up counter.
Nothing so dramatic as a padded cell.
When you are reconciled calm prevails. I
take a seat on the bench and open a copy
of Spectator. Soon, a thin-faced
policeman fills the space at the counter
and examines my passport which has been
put into a plastic bag with gingerly
fingers. I stick to the Spectator. From
behind me my friendly Irishman suddenly
reappars to tell thinface with a big grin
: ''He's all right. He's reading the
Spectator''.
Thinface
replies with a smile of his own, and all
is right with the world again. I ask my
personal Irish saviour how he reads the
Spectator in Boston. On the internet, he
explains grandly.
So now you
know what to do on your next flight to
Boston. Wear a silk tie with a Windsor
knot at Heathrow and read the Spectator
in Boston. If the first doesn't save you,
the second will.
Winter,
said the television weatherwoman on
Thursday morning, was due in three hours.
They can get very specific on American
television in their constant search for
the truth. Such experts are encouraged of
course by the fact that in three hours
everyone will either forget, forgive or
simply not care. If this was the end,
summer was saying goodbye like a diva at
the top of her form, dressed in the
plumes of Paradise. The sun was softened
and melted over the streets,
complementing the cool breezes of
impending change. The local citizens were
out enjoying the sun in the afternoon
unhurried and gossipy. Boston has the
intimacy of a small town and the
confidence of a large city. The placid
Charles river bisects the city, nursing
the world's most famous educational
institutions on one side and commerce on
the other when I leave Boston to travel
north towards Dartmouth- and New
Hampshire, the world along the way has
become a dance. How many colours are
there in brown? In red? In russet? In
yellow? In green? In orange and lilac and
peach? The trees along the road and
across the hillside are an endless feast
as they burst into colour before the
montone of winter, a riot, a whirl, an
impossible orchestra conducted by nature
in some frenzy of joy. If one has to die
then this is the way to go. This is the
last burst of colour even as the leaves
begin to fall and branches turn bare to
take the weight of snow on their thin
limbs; soon, all will be white on the
frozen ground and dark grey against the
freezing sky.
But summer
has not lost out yet, no matter what the
television says. In the forests that
stretch beyond the magnificient campus of
Dartmouth College, you may not be able to
hear a leaf fall in the silence, but you
can hear the leaves, shiver as they
comfort one another on the glade that is
their graveyard.
I am a
guest of Dartmouth College and put up at
the campus hotel. Hanover Inn. A
Halloween pumpkin sits on the reception;
America brings in winter with a great,
eerie, fun, foreboding festival. There is
a fire in the lounge, and impressive
books wait for readers with time. Charm
and hospitality are all around you. My
mobile has stopped roaming, unable to
pick up a local host, which adds
significantly to the peace. At the
lecture I deliver in the afternoon, the
students are less generous than the
sprinkling of faculty and guests
interested in a particular understanding
of the history of Islam and South Asia.
This is as it should be. The report in
The Dartmouth (America's Oldest College
Newspaper. Founded 1799) about this talk
is remarkable for its accuracy and
concise perception. Sadly none of these
brilliant young men and women will become
journalists. They want to conquer Wall
Street Instead.
The train
taking me south starts form a track-level
platform at White River Junction. In
Verment, across the water that forms the
border with New Hampshire. It stops at
similar sidewalks to pick up Real America
from its small towns, and take it to New
York, a city that belongs as much to the
rest of the world as it does to America.
They say that New York has become a
kinder, gentler lace since 11 September,
when the contestants of its permanent rat
place sat back to consider what exactly
they were racing for. Three thousand
divorce applications were withdrawn
within twenty-four hours of 11 September.
New York has taken another look at the
mirror and found, at least for a while,
the family.
The first
important bulletin I got from the local
war zone- and in this city, it means the
economic battlefield is that the United
States has begun pursuit and assault
against the economic routes of terrorism.
Trace the money and get your man. Sounds
sensible. The talk shows are full of this
second conflict now that the bombing of
Afghanistan has slipped into a repetitive
mode with not much forward action. How
many times can you say that America
launched its heaviest raids on Kandahar
today? Television also needs visuals.
Between the Pentagon and the Taliban,
there isn't much footage available.
A
government type in suit and the appears
on the screen to discuss the money supply
lines of the enemy. He seems particularly
interested in a transaction called ''How
Allah''. I wonder what God has to do with
money laundering. The expert notes that
''How Allah'' is an established Indian
practice; this is the way Indians
transfer their money illegally and,
amazingly, they put nothing down on
paper. He looked both bemused and
perplexed.
It was
then that the rupee dropped.
''HowAllah''
was not a nefarious Islamic fund-transfer
ritual practised between conspiring
mullahs. He was talking about ''havala'',
that old and familiar method by which
loaded Indians fund their needs and
pleasures abroad despite the fact that
you cannot officially convert the rupee
into dollars for such purposes. Now, this
is a great story. The United States is
going to solve a problem that the
government of India has tried to solve
for decades and quietly given up on. The
FBI is going to pulverise those networks.
I can hear the sound of chattering teeth
from Kolkata to Mumbai via Delhi. We
could see the emergence of a new Indian
economy, thanks to the FBI, which already
has offices in India, Incidentally.
I always
knew it would take nothing less than a
world war to tackle the moneybags of
India.
Twenty First Century Media.
|
 |
WTO
and its impact on Indian agriculture
By Som
Dutt
India is a
signatory to the Uruguay Round of the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) and one of the original members of
the WTO (World Trade Organization). The
agreement provides a framework for the
long-term reforms in agricultural trade
and domestic policies to move towards
market- oriented agricultural trade. The
obligations and disciplines incorporated
in the agreement on agricultural trade
include market access, domestic support,
export competition/subsidy, sanitary and
phytosanitary measures, and trade-related
intellectual property rights (TRIPs).
In the
area of export competition, the WTO
agreement calls for reducing direct
export subsidies to a level-of 36 per
cent, below the 1986-88 level in
developed countries over a period of 6
years and the quantity of subsidized
exports by 21 per cent, covering the same
period. The Indian exports of
agricultural commodities do not get
direct export subsidy. Most of the
developed countries operate
export-subsidy programmes to enhance
their exports. They would be required to
gradually reduce their export-assistance
programmes. And this would open up new
market for countries like India. If we
are efficient producers of agricultural
products, we would benefit not only from
improved market access opportunities in
the developed and developing countries
but also from the reduction of subsidized
exports and trade -distorting production
incentives in developed countries.
The recent
spurt in agricultural exports and their
diversification from tea and coffee to
items like fish products, cashew kernel,
oilcakes, rice, fruits and processed
foods confirm that Indian agriculture
sector enjoys comparative advantage, says
Dr R S Paroda, former Director-General,
ICAR. However, countries like India
should tread carefully and, while
responding to WTO opportunities in
agricultural trade, the policy of
self-sufficiency in foodgrains production
should not kept aside.
The
agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary
measures lacks specific guidelines. Thay
may be because of differences in
geographical and sanitary conditions
prevailing in different countries.
However, the agreement calls for
harmonization equivalence and
transparency to sanitary and
phytosanitary regulations under the
overall umbrella of the FAOs Codex
Alimentatious.
The
Intellectual Property Rights (IPRS)
regime requires extending patent
protection the processes as well as
product innovation in all fields
including agriculture. India has opted
for sui generis system for protection of
plant varieties confirming the criteria
of novelty, distinctiveness, unformity
and stability. There is explicit
provision for protection of farmers
knowledge and rights to save and exchange
their farm- saved seed, and option to
also grant a compulsory license. The bill
on plant variety protection has been
introduced in the Parliament. It is
presently under the scrutiny of a select
committee and is awaiting clearance.
Intellectual
Property Rights were used to reduce
Indias huge consumerist class and
commercial collaborators. In short, the
TRIPs became the new open sesame
password, using which the Constitutional
provision of our Secular Socialist
Democratic Republic would be facto be
nulified and privatization, with a giant
stride for transnational big business,
would become the unwritten economic
constitution.
The
economic interest of the States have been
in peril, agricultural and industrial
development has been in jeopardy and even
judicial supremacy under challenge from
January 1, 1995 where the WTO took
authority under its grand global
jurisdiction, with its pro-North tilt.
Will our
rulers trade our freedom in the guise of
free trade? The time to protest is late.
There is a wide enough space to preserve
intact our existing patent law, having
due regard to the national urgencies and
social realities and Constitutional
mandates of the people. These are
paramount considerations for the
Government and Parliament so that India
may not buckle under foreign corporate
pressure and, at the same time, with a
vision, expand the articles in the treaty
for not forsaking the people of India.
It must be
realized that domestic reforms are the
pre- requisites for India to consolidate
the gains from the WTO framework
regarding agriculture. In several
export-oriented commodities, India enjoys
comparative advantage. However, this
inherent advantage is slipping on account
of fatigue of green revolution in certain
areas and difficulties in raising
productivity in the vast rainfed areas.
Therefore, productivity- lead growth
holds the key to cost competitiveness.
This places an increased emphasis on the
development of technologies with suitable
changes in research agenda of the
National Agricultural Research System
(NARS). Concerning market access, the
objective of food security must govern
and dictate actions as India will
continue to address the interest of small
and marginal farmers in the future,
according to a report in the ICAR
Reporter.
A number
of other Ministers have spent varying
periods in Jail for their misconduct.
This is the state of affair in the second
most populous State in the country, where
millions, do not have food, water,
shelter, medicine and education. A
political office, has become a kind of
insurance, against the State, moving
against such people, for any crime,they
may have committed.It also ensures, a
lavish life style, at the cost of State
Exchequer. Most States in the country are
facing financial crisis. The latest
earthquake has added a burden of Ra.
25,000 crore to the Nation. The most
important thing to be ensured in such
matters is that the money is spent to
ameliorate the lot of people and not
siphoned away.
Simple
living and high-thinking have been
sacrificed at the cost of appeasement and
sticking on to the office at any cost. In
fact, most Chief Ministers have come to
the conclusion that it is futile even to
talk about austerity. While the States
pay through its nose for the luxuries
enjoyed by the Bureaucrats, Ministers and
Legislators, it is the man in the street,
who has to bear, the entire burden
ultimately.
Surely,
this cannot mean by any stretch of
imagination, that the Governments, run by
such people, are of the people,or for the
people. it is overdue now, to have a
system, which can bring the wrongdoers to
book, without being influenced by any
string pulling. The present system gives
the impression of almost asking the chief
to guard the house. It needs to be
replaced, by those, who care for the
house. Only constant Vigilance on the
part of all the inmates of the house,
that is India, can ensure that nobody
louts it with impunity.
PTI Feature
|
|
Post-Taliban
puzzle
By M Rama Rao
The Allied war
machinery is racing against time in Afghanistan
to wrap up the first phase of the operations
before winter sets in with all its fury and the
anti-American sentiment sweeping through most of
the Muslim world becomes a tidal wave of sorts.
That is why the focus of attention is as much on
the war theatre as on behind the scene operations
aimed at cobbling up a new regime to replace the
Taliban.
In the ultimate
analysis, what matters in Afghanistan is a
political solution, not aerial strikes that are
not dazzling the TV screens like at the time of
Gulf war. More over, there is very little of
tactical relevance to aerial bombardment in a
country devastated by close to a quarter century
of war and war-lordism.
Yes, there is this
real threat from the Stingers and SAMs left
behind after the war against the Red Army. But
there are heard, not seen in action as yet. It is
possible, the Taliban were conserving their
strength for a ground operation.
There is much for
the US and its Western allies to learn "from
the Soviet experience. The Red Army had lost the
" war not because they had less firepower
but because they had failed to win over warlords
and tribal chiefs. The Allies will also do well
to learn from the experience of Pakistan, which
has manipulated its way to the seat behind the
throne in Kabul. In a way, what Osama did with
the Taliban was to replicate the Pakistan example
of creating a loyal band through cash incentives,
and pay offs and privileges.
Reports from the
front line tell us that the Americans are doing
this precisely. How far they would be successful
time alone will tell. The fact that rumblings are
being heard from the Northern Alliance (NA) against
the American scheme of things shows that the
gamble has not yet paid off.
With accretions to
its ranks, the NA has become more broad based.
Today, it can boast of several Pashtun
commanders. Them is unity of purpose that has
come the hard way. But they cannot be expected to
"co-habit with the Taliban. Forcing their
hand exposes an ignorance of the history of the
region. And of course, gives the veto power to
the Pakistani establishment. Even by default this
should not be facilitated if the end objective is
checkmating the Islamists.
Northern Alliance
has its weaknesses. No denying. Abdul Rashid
Dostum and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf are not the ideals
for any. Dostum has a ruthless streak that was in
full display in the early nineties. Sayyaf is no
moderate either. Arab money and Arab volunteers
have watered his conservatism. Gulbudin
Hekmatyars outfit is extremist
Hezb-e-Islami. And he is very strident in his
opposition to the Taliban.
Dostum can be
counted to continue to show a willingness to sit
across the table with the New Taliban and share
power in the Post-Osama, Post - Omar phase. Not
others. Nor their backers. Since there can be no
military solution involving a race that has
defiance writ large on its face, Washington will
do well to come down from its self anointed high
position and involve all the stake holders in a
peaceful, progressive and stable Afghanistan.
In the past couple
of weeks, there is renewed talk of holding a
conclave of traditional chiefs, religious
scholars, and war - lords to secure backing for
formal return of exiled King Zahir Shah to Kabul.
He has thrown a spanner into the American works
by declaring that he is not interested in the
restoration of his monarchy. In a sense it is a
wise move. Since he was deposed in the late
seventies, Afghanistan has witnessed several
changes. There has come a generation, which has
no memories of the Royalty.
So what type of
representative government the King has in mind is
not clear. He may like his grandson, who is in
his thirties to be in the forefront. It is not
going to be to the liking of Pakistan, which was
ill-at ease with the King himself during his
reign in the sixties and the early seventies.
More over, it is doubtful whether the loya
jirga as the conclave is known locally, can
be convened before the winter sets in and covers
the country under a thick blanket of ice. Till
date, there is no agreement on who should be
invited and who should be left out.
At this stage, one
thing is clear. The US cannot afford to bank only
on Pakistan. It has to lean equally on Iran,
India, Russia and adjoining CIS states like
Uzbekistan. What role the US assigns them will
determine the shape of things to come. Only a
regional action plan will make the difference for
today and tomorrow.
We know the
position of India, Russia and CIS countries. Iran
is a party to the New Delhi-Moscow axis. But can
it fit into the Post - Taliban puzzle given the
level of animosity between Tehran and Washington
for over two decades. Minus Iran, is stability
possible?
Reports in the
Middle East press show there is no room for
despondency, as some delicate diplomatic
manoeuvring seems under way far removed from the
spotlight. Within hours of the first air strikes
on Oct. 8, Iran had conveyed to the Bush
administration through the Swiss government that
they would rescue and protect any American
military personnel who got stranded inside their
borders.
The offer followed
a 'discreet meeting' between the US and Iranian
officials in Geneva. Who made the first move for
a thaw in a rozen relationship is not important.
The Americans appear to have taken the initiative
through the British to befriend the supreme ruler
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Because presence of Iran
on the US side on the anti-terrorism plank and in
the post-Taliban phase is a coup d'etat
undoubtedly.
The US Justice
Department is trying to end a class-action
lawsuit brought against Iran by the 52 Americans
held hostage for 444 days during the Carter era
in the year 1979-80. Just to ''protect the
nation's foreign policy and national security
interests generally''. Certificate from the USAID
for Iran's role in alleviating the hardship of
Afghan refugees and Iran's willingness to the
delivery of US food aid through its territory to
Afghanistan are a natural corollary.
Washington, given
its firepower and financial muscle will have to
foot the bill of rebuilding Afghanistan. The
anti-dote to fundamentalism and all the ills that
go with it is development and a caring
administration. The months ahead offer an
opportunity to the United States to pay for its
past sins.
As Edward
Girardet, Editor of the Essential Field Guide to
Afghanistan, and a director of Geneva based Media
Action International, observes, during the Soviet
occupation of Kabul, Washington provided about $3
billion worth of aid to the Afghan resistance
groups, through Pakistan. Much of this was
creamed off by the Pakistani military, with the
bulk of the remaining aid channelled to extremist
groups dominated by Pashtuns. CIA was aware of
what was happening on the ground but just turned
a blind eye even after the Soviets beat a retreat
with bruised ego in 1989 and the ISI paved the
way for the Taliban's triumphant march into Kabul
seven years later in 1996.
The point is the
US cannot afford to display a benign neglect of
Afghanistan once again. Nor can it allow Pakistan
to regain a toe-hold to pursue its strategic
depth policy, which is primarily responsible for
the mess the world finds itself in today.
Whether Washington
plays its Good Samaritan role through the United
Nations or a consortium of neighbour is a matter
of detail. The need for aid is massive, indeed.
Such aid is not philanthropy. Relief agencies
estimate that some six million Afghans, roughly a
third of the population, are in dire straits.
Nature's fury in the form of drought the
Taliban's quixotisms, and now the New War have
brought untold miseries to them. They are in no
position to bear further hardship.
In the words of S
Frederick Starr, Chairman, Central Asia-Caucasus
Institute (Johns Hopkins School of Advanced
International Studies, Washington), the real US
role in Afghanistan is about to begin. Because it
is poverty and ignorance that have allowed
religious and ethnic strife to sprout. Throwing
out ''terrorism regime'' is only the first step.
True, reconciling conflicting interests, and
installing a viable, acceptable government are
going to be a time consuming exercise. So will be
the pulling down of all the Taliban structures
like poppy cultivation and the Moral Police.
Patience, endurance and preseverance should
remain the guiding principles in the interregnum.
The UN appears to be cut out for this 'balancing'
role.
--Syndicate Features
|
US
caught up in a quandary
By:- Prof M L Raina
After the
dismemberment of the Soviet Union, the US
rejoiced for having become the sole super power.
It acted like the world's supercop, swaying its
commanding baton to keep the world under its
thumb, throwing a frown here and a smile there as
its own interests dictated. Like the fabled King
Ozymandias of Egypt, it slightingly proclaimed,
"I am Ozymandia's (read US), the King of
Kings/look at my works, you mighty, and
despair". It took its invincibility (The
attribute of God alone) for granted because its
cup of pride was filled to the brim. Little did
it know that one day it would be caught itself in
a shattering quandary.
The attack on the
twin trade towers and the Pentagon took the wind
out of the swollen sails of the US Government.
The unexpected attack came like a thunderbolt and
smashed the nation's pride to smithereens, and
exploded the myth of invulnerability with a bang.
The whole nation was benumbed and traumatised.
Nervousness was manifest everywhere on the
American soil. This was because of the foolishly
conceived nation of invulnerability.
No heed was paid
to acts of terrorism in some parts of the world
because presumably, the terrorists had the
US-government's Covert blessings. Nearer home,
India has time and again invited American
Government's attention to the Pak sponsored cross
border terrorism which has destroyed thousands of
lives. But every time the US has looked the other
way, or at best offered cosmetic treatments. Here
also it wanted to keep the cauldron of turmoil
boiling in South Asian region also for its long
term interests. It has been talking about the
safety of human rights. But human rights for
whom? Certainly for the citizens of America.
Isn't the US conscious of the ethnic cleansing,
effected by the terrorists, of the minority Hindu
community-The community of Kashmiri Pandits who
were hounded out at gun point from Kashmir? Was
this not a violation of the KPs human rights?
Yes, but for the hypocritical US, 'No' India's
integrity and solidarity have been under constant
threat for about fifteen years now because of
terrorism, and India persistently expressed its
genuine fears that if the transborder terrorism
was not effectively dealt with its would spread
like cancer to other parts of the world. These
fears have come true. But the US Government made
light of this fast spreading menace.
What is the
position now? The monster of terrorism reached
the door steps of the US, causing colossal damage
both material and psychological. The shock waves
were too intense to be borne. The saying
"The higher you rise, the harder you
fall" applies appropriately to the United
States. Terrorism, whose seeds were sown by the
American Government has now hit back like a
boomerang and with virulence. After being shaken
exceedingly by tasting the bitter fruit of
terrorism the US Government started realising
that India's forebodings were not in vain, but
the irony is that it has yet to decide whether
the transborder terrorism should be halted or
not. It is because it can't displease the
military rulers of Pakistan who have their
compulsions of playing the Kashmir card for
domestic consumption. The US allows this because
it has played the game of give and take with
Pakistan. Pakistan who faced sanctions from
America which have now been expediently lifted
because the former has followed has allowed air
space and ground bases to be used by the latter.
America came under
attack and started groaning (read weeping) with
pain why should not this have happened. It was
justified in crying with pain because only the
wearer knows where the shoe pinches. Its own
skin, delicate skin for that, was touched and so
it made frantic appeals to friendly countries for
fighting together and rooting out terrorism from
the globe (read America). It is using others for
its own interests.
President Bush has
vowed "make no mistake about it" to
wipe out terrorism from all parts of the world.
How far he will succeed, time only will show.
In desperation
America has been bombing Afghanistan right and
left without much success so far. It is looking
for bin Laden who has sufficient tenacity, tactic
and power to outwit any person, however powerful
he may claim to be. He is well versed with the
rugged terrains of Afghanistan and its deep maze
of ravines. It is as impossible to look for him
as to look for a needle lost in a haystack.
Mailing of anthrax
to various places in America has added a
dangerously new dimensions to the Afghan war.
This is a real and extremely potent bio-weapon.
It has perplexed the public and Government
agencies. All are at a loss to know how to go
about stopping this type of warfare. The various
intelligence agencies are feverishly working out
plans to find the source of this deadly anthrax,
but so far there has been no breakthrough. The
situation for a common man seems to be going out
of control.
It America had
adopted the policy of live and let live, things
might not have come to such a pass. The whole
seems to be endangered by the biological war
which may assume alarming propositions, engulfing
mostly innocent people. If the US Government
reviews its foreign policy and tries to remove
the basic cause of terrorism and try to bring
peace, the world might heave a sigh of relief.
Discretion is definitely the better part of
valour.
|
 |
| |
 |
|