Mail

How long will jawans bleed?

Sir,

The defence forces of any country are proud of it. Indeed these are the defence personnel who have made supreme sacrifices to keep the borders, unity, integrity and prestige of our country high, especially now-a-days when proxy war has been unleashed at our country and a continuous threat hanging at the borders and inside the country. The task of our defence personnel has become more tough, gigantic and challenging. Fortunately, there was and never will be any dearth of brave men in our country that can sacrifice their heads any time for the sake of mother land and instead of that head infinity times more heads will be present to keep the prestige and flag of our mother nation fly high.

Besides that it is our duty to take care of them and support them in every way. Unfortunately we have never been able to defend them and protect them properly. History is witness to the fact that we have never benefited the country from the sacrifices made by our valiant jawans.

First of all it was in 1947 when Pak was advancing in Kashmir. These were our armed forces that stopped their advances and started recapturing our territory that was lost to the enemy. But before it they could recapture whole of the area cease-fire was declared and a complicated problem reacted that is still sucking the blood of our soldiers.

After that it was in 1962 when Army, for the same of Army, was developed on the Chinese Border and our rulers were careless and sleeping in the garb of slogans like "Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai". It was the worst debacle of our country in which many personal were either killed or many of them even starved to death because of lack of any kind of support to our troops.

In 1971 when we created Bangladesh a record more than 93,000 of enemy personnel were captured by our valiant soldiers But instead of giving permanent solution of the Kashmir problem and all other border disputes all the prisoners of war were given back. Thus making sacrifices of our soldiers null and void.

The recent Kargil victory tells us a different story. It was the first war which we have to fight in our own land that too under harsh and severe unfavourable conditions when too many options were available for us and we must have taught our enemy a lesson. Instead of all these our soldiers were asked to fight a limited conventional was that too under strick restrictions such as not to cross the LoC while the enemy was sitting on their heads, thus increasing the casualties of our soldiers. Even then these were our brave and valiant soldiers that stood victorious in such harsh and rough conditions. But our government always gives the enemy the safe passage so that they may sustain insurgency in different parts of the country.

It is well known to every body the behaviour, our patrol party meted which was captured by the enemy before the Kargil war. Our valiant soldiers were treated in most inhuman barbaric conditions and across all the limits.

The recent incident of Pyrdiwah in Meghyala also speaks volume of inhuman and barbaric treatment meted to our defence personnel that were captured without any provocation. Unfortunately besides all these incidents our callous governments still believe in diplomacy. For how long our security forces will suffer because of wrong policies of our government that are unable to retaliate against the enemy effectively and to provide a freehand to our personnel whether on the border or inside the country in insurgency, related matter. Everytime a condition is imposed on them. Thus making their task more difficult and increasing their casualties. In our country when many people are preaching for animals rights. Foreign mercenaries whose sole aim is to play havoc in our country do have human rights. Why do we deny any kind of right and honour to our valiant soldiers who are giving supreme sacrifices to safeguard the interest of our motherland? For how long this shallow diplomacy will bleed our forces. How many times we will remain silent spectators while keeping a blind faith in all the respective governments and its policies.

Yours etc..
R Choudhary
Jammu

Beasts of Burden

Sir,

How aptly is has been said "all work, no play makes Jack a dull boy". But if we closely analyses the activities of today's children, they are merely left to their studies or if by chance, they get any time they switch on their TV sets and sit in front of the TV. They hardly go for any out door games.

But at the same time, we cannot blame these children. The burden of studies is so much on them that by the time they are free from their books and home work it is too late for them to go out for playing. Thus they are left with the only source of entertainment i.e. TV or computers.

It has also been seen in American that most of the children between the age of 10 to 15 years have caught dangerous diseases like heart attacks etc. because they are all the time sitting in front of their computers without having any physical work to do.

Thus, it is the urgent need to review our education system so that the burden of studies on students become less and they could go out for physical exercise otherwsie the day is not very far away when we will find small children dying of such diseases.

Yours etc...
Suvidha Khanna
Jammu.

SC's welcome ruling

Sir,

It refers to the welcome ruling of the Supreme Court that a trial court may frame charges against an accused without recording reasons thereof. Honorable Court rightly observed that has come to adopt all possible measures to expedite court procedures, and to find ways to avert all roadblocks causing avoidable delays.

It is high time that various legal acts and procedures may be reviewed to quicken the present snail-paced proceedings especially in trial courts. It may be noted that many court-cases are filed only to postpone things. If steps are taken to make judiciary moving fast, then number of court cases will automatically be drastically reduced!

Revised chapter XVII starting from section 138 was effective in the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 from 01-04-1989 to check rising incidents of cheque-bouncing. But useless formalities of getting culprits punished under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, make it very difficult time-consuming and costly to get benefit out of this section. For instance, personal appearance of the complainant may not be necessary on each date. There is no sense in useless lengthy dates summoning first only the banks involved in non-clearing of the bounced cheques when there are documentary proofs like the cheque-return and a debit memos issued by the banks, and the bounced cheque itself bearing clearing stamps of the banks. Procedure should be simple to issue summons directly to the accused person/s immediately on filing of the complaint may be allowed to be represented through lawyer or attorney. Banks may be summoned only when court is not satisfied about genuinely of the bank documents filed with the complaint. Such simplicity will save time and cost of not only complainants but also of courts and concerned banks. Rather there should be simple complaint-form which may also necessary informations relating to cheque-bouncing. Also there may be a proform a for the mandatory notice to be sent to the accused giving final opportunity to pay for the bounced cheque, before filling of the actual complaint.

Likewise other criminal/civil procedures and acts may be reviewed for ensuring justice in time with minimum cost.

Yours etc.....
Subhash Chandra Agrawal,
1775, Kucha Lattushah,
Dariba, Delhi-110006
.