Gulshan Kumar
Gulshan Kumar

Order reserved on
discharge plea of 3
in Gulshan murder

MUMBAI, Mar 28: Three accused in the Gulshan Kumar murder case today urged the Sessions Court to discharge them.....more

N Vittal
N Vittal

‘Fernandes sincere
in bringing transparency
in defence deals’

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: George Fernandes, who quit as Defence Minister following......more

Arun Jaitley
Arun Jaitley

10 fold increase in interim
maintenance on anvil: Govt

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: In the year of empowerment of women, the Government is planning to enhance the interim maintenance....more

Mayawati
Mayawati

Laxman had been made
a scapegoat: Mayawati

LUCKNOW, Mar 28: Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) vice-president Mayawati today said former BJP president Bangaru Laxman had been made a "scapegoat" in the Tehelka issue and urged him to leave the party if he had some "self-respect".....more

BSF-BDR talks
India conveys concern
over illegal migration

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: India today conveyed its concern to Bangladesh over illegal migration of Bangladeshis and trans-border crimes and emphasised the need for concerted efforts........more

HC quashes Manipur
Speaker’s order

IMPHAL, Mar 28: The Gauhati High Court (Imphal bench) has quashed the February 13 order of.......more

No water, power
connections for non
quake-proof buildings

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: Water, electricity and sewage connections will not be forthcoming for newly .....more

SC: Change in offence
could disentitle
accuse from bail

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: An accused granted bail earlier for a minor offence made out in the FIR but .....more



Order reserved on discharge plea of 3 in Gulshan murder

MUMBAI, Mar 28: Three accused in the Gulshan Kumar murder case today urged the Sessions Court to discharge them as there was no sufficient material with the prosecution to frame charges against them.

The Sessions Judge M L Tahilyani reserved his order on the plea of Javed Kalia, Rafiq Ansari and Wasim Khan alias Wasim Babu charged with conspiracy to kill the audio king.

The prosecution opened its case on January 25 before Tahilyani. It has already filed chargesheets against 19 accused facing trial. Besides them, one has turned approver. Prior to framing of charges, three accused today filed discharge plea under Section 227 of CrPC.

Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam vehemently opposed the discharge applications of the accused saying they were deeply involved in the conspiracy which was hatched in Dubai to eliminate Gulshan Kumar due to business rivalry.

He relied upon confessions of approver and accused Jalil Ahmed Fakih to harp on the conspiracy angle. The prosecutor said there was prima facie evidence for framing of charge against the accused. At this stage it would be inappropriate to discard the confession of the approver on the ground that he had retracted his statement, Nikam alleged.

Defence lawyer Abbas Kazmi argued that except for the approver’s confession and statement of another accused there was nothing on record to implicate them. The approver had sought withdrawal of pardon and also declared his intention to be treated as an accused. Hence, his statement could not be relied upon, he submitted. (PTI)

‘Fernandes sincere in bringing transparency
in defence deals’

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: George Fernandes, who quit as Defence Minister following corruption charges in defence deals, was "sincere" in his attempts to bring about transparency in defence acquisition matters, Chief Vigilance Commissioner N Vittal said today.

"As far as I know George Fernandes, my impression is that he was sincere about it. His intentions were good and he was trying to bring in greater transparency in the system and had made efforts with good intention," Vittal said in a discussion on corruption on Doordarshan news channel’s breakfast show.

According to a release issued by programme producers ‘Independent Media Pvt Ltd’, Vittal said Fernandes brought in a new rule that all deals worth above Rs 75 crore would be examined by the CVC and Comptroller and Auditor General of India within one month of being clinched.

Fernandes, as the Defence Minister, had asked the CVC to probe four areas, Vittal said, adding about 400 files were sent on these issues to the CVC to facilitate the enquiry.

These included the issue of whether there were any middle men despite the "no middleman" policy in any of the deals, he said, adding that the CVC would submit its report on this aspect to the Government by April.

The other issues which Fernandes sought to be inquired into were allegations of corruption in Parliament made by Jayant Malhotra MP, corruption charges in navy purchases made by Rear Admiral Purohit and the defence deals worth over Rs 75 crore, Vittal added. (PTI)

10 fold increase in interim maintenance on anvil: Govt

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: In the year of empowerment of women, the Government is planning to enhance the interim maintenance limit for an estranged wife from the existing Rs 500 to Rs 5000, Law Minister Arun Jaitley said today.

"A proposal to enhance outer limit of the interim maintenance from the existing Rs 500 to Rs 5000 by means of an amendment to Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code is being given final shape by the Law Minstry and the Home Ministry and a draft of this would soon be prepared for the cabinet," Jaitley told PTI.

The Law Ministry is also working on the Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act, to amend it suitably so that the women facing divorce proceedings were granted interim maintenance within 60 days of filing an application.

"We are looking into the personal laws and would bring in amendments to the provisions dealing with interim maintenance so that the same is granted to the needy women within 60 days," the Law Minister said.

Jaitley said "in the year of women empowerment, the award of interim maintenance has to be made expeditious and the quantum made realistic keeping in view the present inflation level."

The proposal was almost ready to go before the cabinet, he said adding this was recommended by the Law Commission sometime back.

There have been numerous cases across the country where divorce proceedings have dragged on for years and the question of interim maintenance had also remained undecided for number of years increasing the misery of the women deserted by her husband.

However, Jaitley said the stalling of the business of the house in Parliament had led to a standstill to introduction of several important bills, which were pending with the standing committees.

He said the reforms planned on the civil procedure code, after the violent protests against the amendments to the code by the advocates, was still lying with the parliamentary standing committee.

Another important bill proposing amendments to the Christian Marriage Act is also pending with the standing committee as also the proposal for delimitation of the constituencies, Jaitley said.

The amendments proposed to the Registration Act, making registration mandatory in case of transfer of possession of properties, which would fetch a substantial revenue to the Government, was also with the standing committee, he said.

The Law Minister said if and only when Parliament resumed its normal business, these issues could be taken up. (PTI)

Laxman had been made a scapegoat: Mayawati

LUCKNOW, Mar 28: Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) vice-president Mayawati today said former BJP president Bangaru Laxman had been made a "scapegoat" in the Tehelka issue and urged him to leave the party if he had some "self-respect".

"The resignation of Laxman shows that the BJP has no respect for persons of Scheduled Castes. He has been made a scapegoat in this matter as he had taken the money for the party and not himself," she told newsmen here.

The BSP leader alleged that Laxman was forced to resign while at the same time George Fernandes still continues to be the convenor of NDA.

The argument that Fernandes would again be inducted into the Ministry if exonerated by the inquiry was not applied to Laxman, she added.

She alleged that similar treatment had been meted out to Himachal Pradesh Governor Surajbhan when he was shifted from a bigger state like Uttar Pradesh.

The BSP leader warned that Parliament would not be allowed to function unless the NDA Government arrested and tried those exposed in the tapes on charges of corruption.

She termed the judicial inquiry into the ‘Tehelka expose’ an eye wash and told newsmen here that there was enough evidence to proceed against the guilty.

Mayawati said the BJP should no longer speak on the issues of corruption and criminalisation of politics after being exposed by the ‘Tehelka tapes’ and the recent Kanpur riots.

She alleged that riots in Kanpur were engineered by the RSS, Bajrang Dal and Shiv Sena to divert public attention from the Tehelka expose and demanded the resignation of up Chief Minister Rajnath Singh for what she termed as administrative failure in curbing the violence.

The BSP leader said her party would support a no-confidence motion as and when it was brought in the Lok Sabha by the opposition parties against the Government on corruption issue. (PTI)

BSF-BDR talks
India conveys concern over illegal migration

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: India today conveyed its concern to Bangladesh over illegal migration of Bangladeshis and trans-border crimes and emphasised the need for concerted efforts by both sides to check the same.

Addressing the opening session of a five-day meeting of the border forces of the two countries, BSF Director General Gurbachan Singh Jagat said the Indo-Bangladesh border was facing "serious problems" like illegal migration from Bangladesh to India and other trans-border crimes.

He expressed confidence that these issues would be sorted out at the meeting.

When asked whether the Indian side would convey its concern over ISI activities in Bangladesh, Jagat told reporters on the sidelines of the meeting all the concerns would be discussed.

Bangladesh Rifles Director General Fazlur Rehman, who leads a 12-member delegation, raised the issue of non-ratification of the 1974 ‘Delhi agreement’ and urged India allow "unfettered movement" through the Tin Nigha corridor.

Admitting that there may be "some contention" between the two "contiguous neighbours" despite "our sincerity and positive attitude to maintain peace and harmony", he said the two forces would try to solve problems which sometimes created irritants.

Rehman cited the main problem between the two countries as non-ratification by India of the 1974 Delhi agreement, signed by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and his Bangladesh counterpart Sheikh Mujibur Rehman, to resolve the "inherited border-related disputes".

"Moreover, the two Governments had evolved a noble mechanism to maintain a tranquil border through `the Indo-Bangladesh guidelines - 1975'," Rehman said, adding both these documents provide the guidelines for resolving our border-related disputes in letter and spirit.

"There is no dearth of sincerity on part of both our countries in strengthening our friendly relationship. But for reasons unknown, the historic `Delhi agreement of 1974' still awaits ratification by the Government of India," he said.

Stating that the issue had been raised in different fora for the last 27 years "but without any concrete outcome", the BDR chief said "it is beyond our comprehension (as to) why the agreement that manifests peoples aspirations for peace remains non-ratified by the largest democracy of the world."

Rehman also raised the issue of use of Tin Bigha corridor saying the people of Bangladesh had been complaining about restrictions by India.

"Recently, people (of Bangladesh) are voicing concern for being deprived of their human rights and demanding similar restrictions on the Indian citizens using the corridor," he said, asking India to ensure "unfettered" movement of the people through the corridor. (PTI)

HC quashes Manipur Speaker’s order

IMPHAL, Mar 28: The Gauhati High Court (Imphal bench) has quashed the February 13 order of Manipur Assembly Speaker Sapam Dhananjoy declaring former Chief Minister Nipamacha Singh and seven others as ‘unattached’ members of the house.

Justice J N Sharma gave the ruling yesterday after final hearing of the writ petition filed by Nipamacha Singh, M Kunjo (present Manipur Industries Minister) and Ksh Biren (present Civil Supply Minister).

The petitioners had sought quashing of the Speaker’s order on grounds that it was unconstitutional.

While quashing the impugned order, the judge directed that Nipamacha Singh and the other seven MLAs should continue to be treated as MLAs of the Manipur State Congress Party.

The Speaker had declared the eight mlas as unattached members of the House following their ‘expulsion’ from the primary membership of the MSCP for six years by the then MSCP working president T H Chaoba Singh.

However, the Nipamacha faction of the MSCP insisted that they were ‘genuine’ and filed a writ petition at the imphal bench of Guwahati High Court against the Speaker’s order.

Of the eight MLAs, former Finance Minister H Lokhon Singh subsequently left the Nipamacha Singh faction and joined the MSCP (Chaoba) faction.

The Speaker revoked the order declaring Lokhon Singh as unattached member, Assembly Secretariat source said. (PTI)

No water, power connections for non
quake-proof buildings

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: Water, electricity and sewage connections will not be forthcoming for newly constructed buildings in the capital unless the application form is accompanied by an undertaking that earthquake resistant technologies have been adhered to.

As per the amended Delhi Building By-laws, 1983, notified by the Union Urban Development and Poverty Alleviation Ministry on March 21 this year, such a certificate, signed by the building owner, architect and structural engineer, has been made mandatory while submitting ‘Form D’ for water, electricity and sewage connections, official sources told UNI.

According to the amended by-laws, a certificate stating that the building has been constructed in accordance with structural plans incorporating earthquake-resistant technologies, will have to be apended either with "Form D" or the completion certificate, whichever is applied for earlier.

"As very few people in the capital apply for completion certificates for their buildings, it means that they would have to attach the necessary certificate while submitting ‘Form D’, the sources said. "This is a major development," they added.

With the introduction of the amended by-laws, Delhi has become the first place in the country to amend its municipal laws to incorporate compulsory safety features against earthquakes and enforce responsibility of owners, engineers and architects for this. As per the amendments, three major clauses have been incorporated in the building by-laws, 1983, to provide for compulsory quake-proof safety features and to enforce accountability.

In the first place, it has been made mandatory to provide a certificate alongwith building plans, undertaking that the plans submitted for approval satisfy the safety requirements, as stipulated by the National Building Code (NBC) and the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS).

This certificate, as also the building plans, would have to carry the signatures of the building owner, the architect and the structural engineer.

A similar undertaking, also signed by these three, would have to be given at the time of obtaining the completion certificate or submitting ‘Form D’, whichever is earlier.

Any subsequent change from the construction design would be the responsibility of the owner.

The urgency for such an amendment was felt by the Urban Development Ministry in view of the large-scale damage wreaked in Gujarat by ill designed and poorly constructed high-rises, built in complete disregard of structural safety requirements.

In the case of Delhi, the matter required even greater attention as the capital is known to be located in a highly seismic area, the sources said. (UNI)

SC: Change in offence could disentitle accuse from bail

NEW DELHI, Mar 28: An accused granted bail earlier for a minor offence made out in the FIR but could be disentitled to bail if after investigation he was charged with a graver offence, the Supreme Court has ruled.

"With the change of the nature of offence, the accused becomes disentitled to the liberty granted to him in relation to a minor offence, if the offence is altered for an aggravated crime," a bench comprising Justice K T Thomas and Justice R P Sethi said in a recent judgement.

Justice Sethi, writing the judgement for the bench, said "the mere initial grant of anticipatory bail for lesser offence, did not entitle the respondent to insist for regular bail even if he was subsequently found to be involved in the case of murder."

A case was registered against a person on charges of dowry related crimes and he obtained an anticipatory bail. Later, a chargesheet was filed against the accused under Section 302 but the Magistrate still released him on bail. The Magistrate’s order was upheld by the Delhi High Court.

Justice Sethi said even though there was no bar on a Magistrate from considering grant of bail to a person arrested for an offence exclusively triable by a Sessions Court, generally the Magistrate should direct the accused to approach the Sessions Court.

Justice Sethi said "generally speaking, if punishment prescribed is for imprisonment for life and death penalty and the offence is exclusively triable by the court of sessions, Magistrate has no jurisdiction to grant bail unless the matter is covered by provisos attached to Section 437 of Indian Penal Code."

He said the limitations circumscribing the jurisdiction of the Magistrate were evidence and apparent. "Assumption of jurisdiction to entertain the application is dictinguishable from the exercise of jurisdiction," Justice Sethi said.

On the instant case, the Apex Court said the Magistrate while granting bail did not even refer to the grounds on which the same was being given.

"The Magistrate adopted a wrong approach to confer him the benefit of liberty on allegedly finding that no grounds were made out for cancellation of bail," the bench said.

Turning its attention to the High Court order, it said despite involvement of important question of law, the High Court failed in its obligation to adjudicate the pleas of law raised before it and dismissed the petition of the appellant by a one sentence order.

While setting aside the order of the Magistrate and that of the High Court, the Apex Court allowed the accused to apply for regular bail before the trial court saying the same would be disposed on its merits keeping in view the ruling. (PTI)

| home | state | national | business| editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search | subscribe | send mail |