EDITORIAL
CONGRESS ROLE
For quite sometime the
oldest national party has been suffering from crisis of
confidence. Each successive election has resulted in its
decline. From a party that ruled the country for 46 years
with brute majority and unchallengeable political
authority and public support, its strength in current Lok
Sabha stands attenuated to 112 MPs. All other parties
have grown at the cost of Congress. BJP is comfortably
placed from paltry 2 to 182 MPs. Regional parties like
DMK and Telugu Desam continue to call the shots in Tamil
Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. From ruling party in Tamil Nadu
under Kamraj, it has settled for only 15 seats in the
ensuing assembly polls in alliance with AIADMK. It cannot
hope to win more than 5. In the largest State of Uttar
Pradesh it is in total disarray and has been unable to
win back the faith of the electorate. In W. Bengal and
Kerala it has surrendered the initiative to leftist
bandwagon and desperately looking for some moorings. In
Bihar it enters into alliance with RJD to play second
fiddle to Rabri Devi. One can understand the compulsions
and quality of its MLAs as all the 23 MLAs are made
Ministers. Nothing could be more ridiculous and suicidal.
In the recently held by-elections for 11 assembly seats,
it has lost to NDA candidates. The overall scenario is
that party has failed to put its act together and
continues to go for short-cuts which in turn undermine
its credibility in public esteem.
One has to treat Congress
Party somewhat differently when compared to other
parties. It is still the second largest and to that
extent party-in-waiting for the Delhi throne. Without it
no combination can hope to capture power. Unfortunately,
party is bogged down in petty politics, cheap gimmicks
and joining wrong company continues to cause attenuation
both at State and Central levels. There is acute
dissidence which is major stumbling block. There are too
many aspirants for too less seats. Inner party democracy
continues to be at a discount as entire decision making
is left to the party President Sonia Gandhi. It is as
much true even when it comes to selection of candidates
for State assemblies, Corporations or even Panchayats.
This means none else is competent. This is negation of
democracy. The second factor relates to its secular
character as also champion of the down-trodden and
Dalits/OBCs. In reality it has not been able to please
either the minorities or the Dalits. To be precise, it
has lost even the upper cast votes. That is why it
continues to grope in the dark and opting for short cuts.
Third aspect that has caused erosion to its popularity is
the lack of clear perspective on vital national issues.
It continues to play either side alternatvely and leaving
the options wide open. Such dispensation obviously does
not sell. Clarity and well-spelt out priorities are
essential ingredients to regain popular support of the
masses. It indulges in criticism for the sake of
criticism which has failed to fetch any dividend to the
party fortunes at the husting. In short refusal to
function as a responsible and responsive opposition
continues to cost the party dearly.
AICC session is on in
Bangalore. Some political resolutions provide insight
into where things have gone wrong. One resolution seeks
reversal of Panchmarhi decision where the party had opted
to go single-handed. It is now ready to share power with
all secular dispensations. It will be all the more better
if Congress goes in for pre-electoral adjustments.
Coalition culture is there to stay and no national party
can do it on its own. Instead of providing crutches to
other miniscules like it did to formation of UF
Government, it must give the lead as the largest single
opposition party or else wait. Mere anti-BJPism is not
going to help it. Likewise, overplaying the minority card
is equally counter-productive. There is also the
resolution on Kashmir where Congress does not spell how
to break the ice but puts the NDA in the dock for
mishandling Kashmir issue. It must appreciate that what
Congress could not do when it ruled the country with
brute majority cannot be done so easily by the coalition
Government more so because Kashmir problem owes its birth
to wrong policies of the Congress Party right from 1947
onwards. It refuses to go for consensus. Instead it
choses to go for blanket criticism. Such thinking needs
total reversal because no ready solution is available to
solve the Kashmir imbroglio. It was experimental approach
right from 1947. It is so even today. There is yet
another resolution on liberalisation of economy. Congress
rejected socialistic pattern of society and social
control from 1991 onwards and opted for liberalisation.
This policy yielded good dividends and put the economy
back on the rails. It is healthy sign that United Front
Govt continued with the policy even as present NDA
Government is pursuing second generation reforms quite
vigorously. The Congress must come out of narrow cocoons
of inhibitive approach and spell out clearly whether it
is for liberalisation or not. Karnataka Chief Minister S
M Krishana wants Congress to be very clear on its
approach and policy. Right now, Congress is neither here
nor there. Such confused approach is bad for any national
party, more so when it is the party-in-waiting.
The party has neither done
any justice to democracy nor to itself by stalling the
proceedings of Parliament this time. Prime Minister has
already announced comprehensive enquiry into Tehelka.Com
expose and promised to spare none found guilty. Congress
must not doubt integrity of sitting Supreme Court Judge.
That is the farthest any Government can go. If it rejects
this enqiry, it shows its lack of faith in judiciary.
Further, NDA has decided to seek vote-of-confidence in
Lok Sabha when it assembles after almost a week of
turmoil and stalled proceedings. Remember, in democracy
there are no short-cuts. RJD chief is charge-sheeted in
multiple scams. It is in alliance with AIADMK whose chief
is likewise heavily scam-tainted. The Bofor kick-back
case is in 15th year and yet it is on. Congress Party
must understand how democracy functions. It would do real
good to the party if it treats every situation on merit
rather than go for fish-market politics. After all, it is
the 115 year old national party and that too a
party-in-waiting.
HURRIYAT REBUFFED
Refusal of UN General
Secretary Kofi Annan to grant audience to Hurriyat Leader
AG Lone shows how far away is the amalgam from the
calculations of United Nations. First, Annan had refused
to mediate in Kashmir or go by the UN Resolutions of 1948
for resolving Kashmir issue. Rejection of plebiscite or
call it self-determination which has been the favourite
theme of Hurriyat is a total setback to the so-called
movement. Annan now says 'no' to any meeting with Lone on
the plea that there is no time in his three day hectic
schedule in New Delhi. Nothing could be more damaging. To
be precise, the then American ambassador Frank Wisner
during his interaction with Hurriyat leaders in Srinagar
had advised the amalgam to contest elections for
legitimising its claims of being the sole representative
of people of Jammu & Kashmir State. He had also
stated that plebiscite is not the only means to ascertain
wishes of the people; a fair election is good enough.
Subsequently, British MPs and also EU representatives had
also advised Hurriyat to try its luck at the husting.
Annan's perceptions have thus no place for Hurriyat or
its leaders. His stress is on Lahore Declaration which
offers fair chance of peace and settlement of issues
bilaterally as between India and Pakistan.
|
Today
is St. Joseph's Day
Saint Joseph- patron of work
By P K Joseph Dhar
The entire
catholic world comprising about 1.25
billion heads celebrate the feast of St.
Joseph on March 19 each year. He was the
person to whom an angel of the Lord
appeared in a dream who had resolved to
divorce Mary as she was found with a
child before they had come together,
saying; ''Joseph, son of David, do not
fear to take Mary your wife, for that
which is conceived in her is of the Holy
spirit. She will bear a son and you shall
call his name Jesus, for he will save his
people from their sins''. (Mathew
1:20-21)
It is a
common belief that he was a carpenter.
But the Greek word the Gospel uses is
''technee'' which may mean one possessing
more technical skill than suggested by
carpenter. He had the technical skill to
pursue to trade that included carpentary,
welding, building of houses and boats
that involved other professional skills.
However, from this we cannot conclude he
was just a labourer. That is one aspect
of the work St. Joseph undertook. He is
more fittingly called the worker. Worker
would mean that he undertook not only
carpentary to earn a living but invested
his life in doing 'Opus Dei' or the work
of God.
What was
the 'Opus Dei' he performed? The answer
is simple. He taught Jesus Christ to read
and write, to study the scriptures and to
worship. He also povided a conducive
atmosphere for the child to absorb the
Jewish culture and ethos. It is also
apparent that he taught Jesus Christ
certain skills appropriate to a growing
child.
Saint
Joseph took his profession very seriously
as his God given vocation. It was not
merely to earn a living that he persued
it but to render service to God. He was
doing excellent service when he raised
Jesus Christ, the son of God to be a
complete human being. All unawareness
Saint Joseph was playing the part of God
the father when he taught Jesus Christ
carpentary and other skills that were at
the same time imbued with the divine
spirit. In this regard we can say that
committed loving service was the purpose
of all the work he undertook. This is all
the more true when his service is
contextualized, for he was serving Jesus
Christ, God made man, even if he were not
fully aware of it.
Saint
Joseph was a model teacher and a model
worker. Not only this, he was an
exemplary parent and head of the first
family of the world. He dedication to
work was a clarion call to all workers
''workers of the world unite to serve
with love! You have nothing to lose
except your slavey to sin and utopian
delusion.''
It shall
not be impertinent at this point to probe
a little deeper into the nature of work.
If for a greater part of His life on
earth Jesus Christ was a worker engaged
in hard labour alongwith His foster,
parent Saint Joseph. He certainly
intended to reveal an aspect of human
life of utmost importance viz value of
Human Labour.
We all
know that God has infused in every
individual a very powerful urge to work
and produce something. This creativity
urge prompts one to explore, prove,
invent, alter, construct, to progress and
to experience the joy of doing. Here we
can say that man needs to work because he
is created in the image of God and always
works.
Our Lord
Jesus Christ came to build the bridge
between God's work and man's. Lord God in
Christ Jesus wanted to experience human
work, and He experienced it under the
tutelage of Saint Joseph. As a result,
Lord Jesus Christ as man and God looks at
work, with much love.
Every
thinking mind shall not fail to
understand the stark truth that our
father in Heaven does not cease working
even for a fraction of a moment. If He
were so the entire scheme of things shall
come to griding balt. This is also made
clear by Jesus Christ Himself when he
said, 'My father is still working and I
also am working''. (John 5: 17). He said
this to his opponents who were
questioning His right to work on a
Sabbath Day. Jesus Christ therefore, made
it clear to them, that the greatest
worker in the world is God Himself who
works round the clock without ceasing.
This gives us an idea of work both in the
cosmic and earthly dimension. God's work
has a definite link, with human
existence. Thus work is woven into the
very texture of human existence.
If we turn
to the Book of Genesis of the Holy Bible
the sacred writer says that on the first
six days of the earth's existence God
worked and He rested on the seventh. From
this account, we can safely infer that
the importance of work in the life of man
is immensely highlighted.
We know
from the life of our Lord Jesus Christ
that in His native village Nazareth
people took it for granted that He was a
worker alongwith His foster parent Joseph
in whose trade he was an apprentice at
first: ''Is not this the carpenter the
son of Mary''? (Mark 6:3). It is,
therefore, Jesus Christ, the worker that
inspires and shows the value of work in
the right perspective. He is the one who
animates families from the nuclear to the
global, to live a more human life through
work done with the awareness of its
value. Our Lord Jesus Christ would not
have wasted most of His lifetime on earth
to work as a carpenter if it did not have
salvific value.
In a
spiritual sense Jesus Christ considers
every worker in the world as Co-worker
with Him for saving the world. Foremost
among them is Joseph whose work was
sanctified by Jesus Christ even before He
was conceived in Mary's womb. Saint
Joseph had the further privilege of
introduction Lord Jesus Christ to human
work that a time came when the carpenter
of Nazareth would indicate either Saint
Joseph or our Lord Jesus Christ
interchangeably.
My
obeisance to my patron Saint who infused
in my soul the spirit of committed and
dedicated work.
|
 |
Perspective
on saving environment
By Dr Navin Chandra
Joshi
The annual
review of environment 2000, brought out
by the world bank, states that more than
20 per cent of the total burden of the
explosive rise of various diseases in the
Asian region is due to environmental
factors. Over half of these are just from
the polluted water and lack of
sanitation, apart from the atmospheric
pollution. More interesting is the
publication. ''The state of the Food
Insecurity in the World 2000'' a report
of the Food and Agricultural Organisation
(FAO) as it reveals that the State of
undernourished and poor in South Asia is
even worse than Africa, since more than
50 per cent children under the age of
five are underweight as compared to 33
per cent in Africa. Yet, the two main
countries of the region viz. India and
Pakistan, alone are spending more than 12
billion dollars a year on military.
So then,
no wonder there is a strong complementary
between the goals of economic development
and improvement in environment. ''The
world has reached a common global
understanding of fundamental threats to
the earth's ecological balance,'' said
Prime Minister, Atal Behari Vajpayee
recently. He has called for making the
global environment facility of the United
Nations as a catalyst for universal
participation and innovative programme
for increasing awareness and a sense of
urgency to develop and pursue a
sustainable development path for the
benefit of current and future
generations.
Vajpayee
is of the view that the rich countries
should face problems by laying down
stringent emission norms, including
limits on pollutants and by enforcing
these stringent norms and limits, but the
developing world should also tackle the
same by putting into place an incentive
structure that encourage conservation and
discourage the scavanging of nature,
without compromising economic development
and rapid alleviation of poverty.
The Earth
consists of different components which
are inseparable and integral to it. The
gaseous atmosphere which envelops the
Earth, the hydrosphere which contains all
the water bodies, and the lithosphere,
the solid uppermost layer of the Earth,
are the important components for
sustenance of life on the Earth.
Pollution and destruction of any one of
these 'spheres' affects the others since
they are all interrelated. Thus,
preservation of the environment needs an
integral and holistic approach.
The
quality of physical environment has been
deteriorating continuously for the last
many years. The quality becomes all the
more disgusting because of the rapid
growth of population and the subsequent
fall in living standards in developing
countries, including India.
And yet,
the paradox is that the number of
automobiles in urban areas- their
ever-increasing number has become the
most serious threat while aggravating air
pollution through emissions of
carbondioxide, nitrous oxide and suspened
particulate matter (SPM) which today in
all the metropolitan cities of India are
much above the accepted norms in the
embient air.
Non
wonder, the increasing levels of air
pollution pose dangerous implications for
the health an work efficiency of the
citizens.
The other
important consumption item for human
beings is water. Rivers and other water
bodies which are the major sources of
drinking water, are getting increasingly
polluted by industrial and urban sewage
disposals, along with negligent attitudes
of the people. Even in the river Ganges,
enonmous quantities of untreated domestic
swage is poured into it along with
effluents from a number of industries.
From the point of its entry into Delhi
till Chambal river joins it, the Yamuna
is considered a dead river because of the
release of around 2000 million litres of
untreated sewage daily along its 22 km
stretch in Delhi. So is the fate of most
of the rivers that flow through big
cities, especially in all countries of
the developing world.
Obviously,
therefore, the need of the hour is to
save our natural habitat and heritage
from getting polluted.
Sustainable
development needs to become the new buzz
word in environment circles. But how many
of us understand its real meaning? for
environmentalists, sustainable
development denotes a radical change in
our way of living, beginning with smaller
populations. As such, family planners,
not farmers or scientists, hold the key
to future food supplies, global
environment crisis has been contributed
by both the grinding and pervasive
poverty in the developing nations (called
'pollution of poverty') as well as of the
humanity growing under sub-human
conditions. Poverty itself has now become
the 'biggest polluter'. The anatomy of
the gathering environmental crisis is
engulfed by this stark reality.
Therefore,
the need of the hour is to cry halt to
the process of senseless environmental
destruction, lest the environmental
crisis itself should overwhelm us. Being
a multi-dimensional phenomenon, the
environmental crisis must be dealt with
as such, the only effective remedy for
halting the growing hodes of
environmental refugees is 'sustainable
development accompanied by environmental
conservation. New environmental ethos
must pervade at all levels of our
decision-making as well as allocation of
funds for developmental goals.
It is true
that environment, whether one likes it or
not affects us all. And yet, most of us
know very little about the major changes
affecting the environment, dramatic
shifts in the world's weather patterns or
the detrimental effects of urban
pollution. It is difficult to say
precisely which is causing more havoc on
environment reckless industrialisation or
deforestation. In a way , both act in
collusion.
The of the
environment policy in developing
countries has been on controlling
pollution of any type, rather than
preventing it. and yet, the 'polluter
pays' principle has been found to be
difficult to implement as there are
clusters of small industries which do not
have the access to, or the capital for
technical knowhow for pollution control.
The initiative has, therefore, to come
from the government.
In a way,
much of the development in the world
today is not sustainable. It is based
upon the squandering of our 'biological'
capital viz, soil, forests animals, plant
species and air. Many of our economic,
monetary and trade policies in sectors
such as energy, agriculture, forestry and
human development tend to induce and
reinforce non-sustainable development
patterns and practices. As some patterns
of development have improved
environmental conditions, others have
only tended them sometimes irreversibly.
In the
last two decades or so, most of the
developing countries have witnessed a
steady increase in environmental
degradation and many new industrialising
countries have experienced massive
environmental deterioration in the wake
of sudden industrialisation and explosive
urbanisation. The capacity of a number of
developing countries to manage their
environment, so as to secure the
well-being of their people, is also
coming under severe stress, following the
rapid population growth, its uneven
distribution and inadequate
socio-economic development.
In fact,
human survival depends upon the life
activities of thousands of species of
plants, animals and micro-organisms and
upon intricate physical and chemical
reactions in the atmosphere, oceans,
fresh water and so on.
The
vastness and complexity of this
interdependence have already become
evident with increasing human
intervention into the life-giving
processes of our planet. All life is
dependent on the interaction of matter
and energy carried out in the earth's
ecosystem. It is these interactions which
we are altering even before we fully
comprehend them. The peope of the world
must come to understand them to preserve
them and when altering them, to tackle it
with care and wisdom.
There is a
fundamental conflict between traditional
concepts of economic growth and the
preservation of environment. During the
last century, uncontrolled growth in
industrial production of environmentally
harmful substances and products in some
regions of the world has produced
dangerous amounts of pollution and has
been responsible for an inordinate waste
of resources. At the same time, an
increasing concentration of industrial
activity has led to centralisation,
within a few nations, of the benefits of
the earth's natural resources, and the
international political influence that is
derived from the control of the
resources.
It has
become clear that a more rational
distribution of industrial power is
necessary if the global problems of
environment and society are to be solved.
Such a distribution would achieve, at the
same time, a more equal appropriation of
economic and political benefits among
nations and individuals.
In sum,
the problem is quite complex and there is
no single solution. In any case, it is
high time that environmental tribunals
are set up in our country to implement
the environmental safeguards. Surely, any
viable strategy must take into account
not only the physical nature of the
problem but also the human factor
involved. Moreover, mere legislation can
neve be a solution unless it is enforced
strictly. If our environment is to be
saved from further degradation, there is
an urgent need to remove the lacunae in
the implementation of environment
protection laws. Otherwise, the vast
majority will continue to pay the price
for the misdeeds of a recalcitrant few.
PTI Feature
|
|
Dealing
with Afghanistan
Neither the United
Nations nor the sanctimonious West has covered
itself with glory by showcasing their
pusillanimous inaction in the face of the
Taliban's criminal operations which are aimed at
destroying not just statues, but an invaluable
part of the world's cultural heritage going back
to thousands of years. Religious fundamentalism
almost always militates against the development
of the finer aspects of human civilisation,
though religions - Buddhism, Christianity,
Hinduism, Islam - have contributed to the
enrichment of philosophy, art, literature, and,
crucially, human sensibility.
Even Marx
acknowledged this when he wrote that religion was
the heart of a heartless world and the sigh of
the oppressed, even though it was the opium of
the masses. Fundamentalism has always sought to
deny the legitimacy of the corporeal form, by
valorising the sphere of the sacerdotal and the
spiritual. By doing so, it rejects the joyous
celebration of the physical and material world,
which is central to human existence. If religion
were not to work towards the material
rehabilitation of humanity it would be dead on
arrival. In India, the saints who led the
reformist Bhakti movement made a humanist
statement which traditional, caste-bound Hindu
society had to come to terms with. Much later, in
Latin America "Liberation Theology"
propagated by priests of the Catholic Church
espoused the cause of the individuality and the
right to dignified existence of the exploited
peasants of that continent. That is the essence
of religion - empathy in the search of a more
equitable world.
It is intolerable
that religion should be invoked to engage in the
kind of vandalism that the Taliban have embarked
upon. Destruction of statues goes hand in hand
with arbitrary social sanctions - injunctions
that deny women their fundamental and natural
human rights, for instance. Talibanic Afghanistan
is a travesty of humanity. Unfortunately, it has
grown to be a Frankenstein monster which its
sponsors cannot control anymore.
The Taliban have
brushed aside Pakistan's appeal to spare the
priceless monuments it has destroyed. The rest of
the Islamic world has either ignored this act of
barbarism or failed to dent the Taliban's
resolve.
Given the fact
that the Western world, especially the United
States, has played a not inconsiderable role in
the rise of the Taliban, the world has the right
to expect that today's sole superpower will take
immediate and sanguinary steps to subdue the
Taliban's latest initiative. The US has shown
great resolve in its attempts to have Osama bin
Laden extradited. The United Nations has imposed
sanctions against Afghanistan for sheltering him.
But in a case where narrow national interest is
not involved, the West has shamefully disengaged
itself from what is undeniably a civilisational
responsibility.
Signs of cold war
rekindling in some form or the other are
emanating from Washington. The Russian opposition
to the new US missile defence systems is
irritating the Americans. Pakistan can once again
become a strategic partner for the US if it can
assist in the hand-over of Osama bin Laden, and
at the same time, destabilise Russia with the
help of Taliban militia.
China surely is
not amused at the possibility of 'Talibanised'
unrest, if not awakening, in its own backyard
bordering Afghanistan. But Beijing will not be
averse to allowing the Taliban to stew in its own
political juice of Islamic extremism inside
Afghanistan, at least for some time, if there can
be a strategic insurance against its export to
China. Pakistan, as a conspicuous ally of the
Taliban, can be expected to offer China such an
assurance behind the scenes.
From the present
standpoint of Pakistan, headed by an essentially
'secular' military ruler in Gen. Pervez
Musharraf, the Taliban's fundamentalist energies
can be stirred in ways detrimental to India in
Jammu and Kashmir, which is very much seen by him
to reflect the 'unfinished agenda of the
partition' of the Indian subcontinent. This
phrase was first used long before Gen. Musharraf
emerged on the Pakistan scene as a secularist
influenced by Kemal Ataturk of Turkey.
Now, the Taliban's
strategic-tactical utility to Pakistan was the
key factor that prompted Gen. Musharraf to blame
India for a recent bomb explosion at a vegetable
market on the outskirts of Islamabad, despite
reports that the device was found in a crate of
fruits coming from Afghanistan. India and the
Taliban, which controls the area in question,
have always been poles apart.
Uzbekistan, among
all the Central Asian republics with erstwhile
Soviet connections, reckons that the Taliban
deserves to be kept at arm's length. On a
separate plane, Teheran's equation with
Washington has not stabilised since the
Shia-slanted Iranian political revolution. Yet,
Iran and the U.S., the latter after some cool
calculations, share at this moment a strategic
interest in stemming the tide of the Taliban
inside and outside Afghanistan.
Russia, successor
to the Soviet Union which beat a military retreat
from Afghanistan under Mr. Mikhail Gorbachev's
glasnost and perestroika as extended to foreign
policy, is now under a President, Mr. Vladimir
Putin, who cannot afford to leave Afghanistan to
its own devices - such as those that the Taliban
might provide as the predominant warlord in a
failed state. The remnants of the Taliban's
opponents are still being commanded by Mr. Ahmad
Shah Masood, the renowned anti-Soviet guerrilla
and a latter-day India-friendly leader.
Now, although not
directly threatened by either a present or a
potential Taliban wave, except in Chechnya,
Moscow will nonetheless find itself constrained
in its interactions with its former provinces of
Central Asia, should these states face a
Taliban-inspired insurgency within their own
domains. Nor surprisingly, Mr. Putin is at
present inclined to open a dialogue with Gen.
Musharraf.
The latest
India-U.S. unison over their current 'concerns'
regarding Afghanistan is a far cry from the time
immediately before and after the rise of the
Taliban as a political force in 1994-95. Then,
suspicions were up in the air that the U.S. might
have masterminded a Taliban-style alternative to
the interminably squabbling Afghan 'mujahideen'
groups which had earlier been aided by the U.S.,
with Pakistan playing a Man Friday, in the war
against the Soviet 'stooges' in Kabul. The U.S.
has consistently refuted all suggestions that it
was the brain behind the rise of the Taliban as
an Afghan outfit with direct genetical roots in
Pakistan's Islamis religious schools in the
Quetta and Peshawar belts. Washington, it was
said in the mid-1990s, would not wish to create a
Frankenstein's monster in Afghanistan.
Yet, a fashionable
theory right across the diplomatic spectrum in
Islamabad during 1994-97, the period of the
Taliban's ascendancy, was that Pakistan's
intelligence output, Saudi Arabia's funds and the
U.S.'s strategic resourcefulness were behind the
initial momentum of that Sunni-Muslim
fundamentalist outfit. The common interest of
these countries was the establishment of some
post-Soviet stability in Afghanistan in a
reversal of its then rampant civil war phase
which, to Islamabad's chagrin, was dominated by
an India-friendly Mr. Masood.
Pakistan was at
that time keen on the emergence of a friendly
regime in Kabul, given that Islamabad would
always regard Afghanistan as a realm of
'strategic depth' with reference to India. For
Saudi Arabia, the bastion of the Sunni faith, an
amenable Taliban would have been a useful
counterpoise in Afghanistan in relation to its
neighbouring Shia citadel of Iran - Riyadh's
traditional rival in Islamic politics.
The U.S., on the
other hand, was at that time reckoned to be in
search of a stabilising force in Afghanistan,
irrespective of its internal dynamics, so that
drug trafficking and other newly-identified
international scourges of a post-Cold War
orientation could be controlled. The Taliban,
with its initial puritanical opposition to the
narcotics menace as amplified by Mullah Omar as
its leader, was seen to suit the U.S. agenda of
the mid-1990s in that pocket of the world. But,
not so after the arrival of a Saudi dissident -
Osama bin Laden who later acquired notoriety as a
terrorist on Washington's list of wanted
criminals - in the Taliban-controlled Afghan
territory in 1996. This could have easily turned
both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia against the
Taliban, if these two countries had not blessed
its rise in the first place.
If the Taliban had
indeed chosen in 1996 to defy its alleged
benefactors, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, that
could be traced to the rugged sense of fierce
independence which the Afghans were known to
cherish. It was against that balance-sheet that
the Taliban's demonstrated 'restraint' at the
Kandahar airport, at the height of the Indian
Airlines' plane hijack drama there in December
1999, has not earned it any international acclaim
as a responsible player, contrary to the view in
Pakistan by observers of the Taliban phenomenon
such as Kamal Matinuddin.
At another
strategic level, despite Pakistan's constant
efforts to woo the Afghans in its battle of wits
with India, the leaders in Kabul have
traditionally sought to play the so-called India
card in order not to become subservient to
Islamabad. That, in part, accounted for the move
in the mid-1990s by Afghan Islamist leaders such
as Prof. Burhanuddin Rabbani and Mr. Masood to
try and build bridges with India. Given this
historical reality, India may continue to figure
in the strategic calculations of the future
leaders in Kabul, if Afghanistan can be put back
on its feet as a state within recognised
boundaries. India needs to be associated with the
U.N. caucus on Afghanistan, at least as an
associate member, even if the caucus does not
turn into an international conference on a failed
but not forgotten state. INAV
|
 |
| |
 |
|