EDITORIAL
SCHOOLS WITH WEAPONS
A news item from the Dawn
of Pakistan says that the military Government in that
country is thinking of imposing a ban on military
training in religious schools and withdrawing weapons
from the inmates. There are more than fifty thousand
madrassahs (seminaries) throughout the length and breadth
of the country. Some of these are quite large and
imposing ones with elaborate arrangements for the board
and lodging of the students. The seminaries engage
teachers well versed in Islamic learning, some without
salaries because they consider it a service to the
propagation of Islam. Pakistani officials claim that
thousands of pieces of weapons have been voluntarily
deposited with the Government when an announcement was
made that the unlicensed arms should be deposited.
Although the truth of recovery of such a large number of
weapons remains to be ascertained, nevertheless this
gives an idea of the extent to which Pakistani society
has been weaponised and for what purpose?
But gun is the essential
part of the curricula and training at the current
madrassahs of Pakistani brand. The main teaching in these
seminaries is of jihad. Now to think that a Pakistani
student at the seminaries is ultimately required to wage
a jihad without weapons is tantamount to converting him
to Gandhian creed. As such, a jihad comes closer to
Gandhian philosophy in the interpretation of the current
military rule in Pakistan. One wonders if the Pakistani
civil society will agree to become the Gandhiates and bid
farewell to arms? But those who run the madrassahs and
those who recruit the outgoing students from these
seminaries have pledged to wage the armed struggle till
India is Islamised and Islamic flag is hoisted atop the
Red Fort. A Pakistani madrassah without the gun and gun
culture is like a fish out of water. The two situations
are irreconcilable. At the same time, a student from this
type of seminary in Pakistan, meaning a student loaded
with puritanical Islamic ideology minus a gun is much
more dangerous than one carrying a gun. A fanatical
mullah in the mosque is to be feared more than the jihadi
with a gun stalking the streets and suburbs.
The drive to
"de-weaponise" religious and fundamentalist
groups in Pakistan has been dismissed by a section of
local media as a sham with the Pervez Musharraf regime
publicising minor efforts to recover weapons to pacify
international community while desisting from carrying out
these drives against known militant outfits. The military
regime, which declared in last week of May an amnesty to
encourage surrender of weapons from militant or
fundamentalist groups, has so far failed to get a good
response from these outfits and the recovery has been
low. Wrote one columnist," As it is, critics do not
think the Government has even done its homework
If
they can even achieve 40 per cent success, that would be
amazing". Another paper wrote that after six days of
amnesty period to surrender illicit arms voluntarily, the
general public has deposited 3,988 weapons and 15,234
rounds of ammunition." Among these the highest
number of deposited weapons came from NWFP, followed by
Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and Islamabad. There were no
recoveries from PoK. Whatever the case, scepticism about
the de-weaponisation drive of the Pakistani military
regime appears to be justified. Another paper wanted to
know if the Government indeed had some data on arms, has
identified the groups in possession of such weapons,
knows the seminaries where arms are stored, then what is
stopping it from moving in? Why should the Government
simply give warnings and keep extending the amnesty
deadline? It is logical that such groups would hide their
weapons or take other measures against the drive. It will
be recalled that such an operation was earlier carried
out in Sindh in 1992, but it got bogged down with
political issues and the tussle between the ISI and the
military intelligence. One columnist even went to the
length of giving the list of major militant
organisations, which were, knows for their weapon
strength but not touched by the Musharraf regime in its
"de-weaponisation" drive. These include
Jaish-e-Muhammad, LeT and some others. A report in the
Dawn said the military regime launched the drive
following a warning by the USD, especially during the
recent visit to Islamabad of the CIA chief, George Tenet,
to keep the international community in "good
humour". Yet another report said that barely 48
hours before the de-weaponisation campaign was to kick
off, the Government released two leaders and nearly 10
activists of militant Barelvi Sunni Tehreek. They were
arrested for possession of weapons and disturbing peace
and cases of high treason were registered against them.
In this scenario, there cannot be much hope that the
Government is too serious about de-weaponisation
programme or stopping the madrassahs from giving arms
training to the students.
PRIVATE SCHOOLS
Complaints against private
schools have been piling up. These are mostly about
exorbitant admission and monthly tuition fees charged by
these schools. Apart from these two heads, the students
are asked to pay frequently for one or the other pretext.
Thus parents are fleeced because they must give education
to their wards. A general notion and a false notion is
that the parents who are eager to send their wards to
private schools are evidently financially strong enough
to pay the heavy fees. This wrong notion has to be
dispelled. Essentially the parents want their wards to
have better environment and culture which, somehow, has
been the privilege of many private schools. It is a
natural instinct that the parents would not want their
wards to go into the wrong company. That does not mean
that they should be fleeced for this small and natural
desire.
The Consumer Council has
received numerous complaints against private schools
charging heavy fees. The meeting called by the Education
Minister of the Consumer Council and the Association of
Private Schools is a right step to address the problem.
The advice of the Minister that the private schools
should fix a norm for charging the fees according to
their standard and that they should avoid demand
arbitrary fee. It is a right step that every private
school forms an advisory committee in which the parents
are also members and it lays down the norms for that
particular school. This is all fine but the real
responsibility rests with the government itself. The
Government should also intervene in the matter actively
because ultimately unless the Government gives
recognition to a school, it cannot function. Giving
recognition means that the school should observe basic
norms laid down by the Government. The fixation of fees
and other charges should also form the part of those
norms. This is a step that government should not lose
sight of.
|
Going
radio ga-ga retreat
By
Sandip Bhattacharya
I was
exiled to a desert island recently. Not
quite. I spent a long month in an old
tumble down house in an eastern city. The
house had no television, a small
palm-held radio of uncertain volume, no
car and I didnt have a great deal
to do. So it was like a desert island.
The books I had read, most of them,
during earlier stays over the years.
There was no Sarat Chatterjee or Bankim
Chandra collections and only on a few
scattered volumes of Tagore. I re-red old
classics like Thomas Hardys. The
Return of the Native, Charles
Margans The Judge Story, an old
Penguin edition of Shakespeares
Measure for Measure and the Penguin book
of Comic and Curious Verse. In the desert
I had one redeeming asset a
powerful 15-band radio and the BBC World
Service. They enriched my month.
International
affairs, music, religion, debate,
discussions, world history, interviews,
interview-cum-discussions, musical quiz
programme, sport, science, travel,
womans hour, foreign
correspondents dispatches, all
these I listened to and the end product
was immensely satisfying. Quite a few
years ago, I used to know the head of the
cultural department of the Ford
Foundation who had his office in Paris
near the Arc de Triomphe. It was a time
when British governments, particularly
Conservative ones, were forever
threatening to prune grant to the BBC
World Service. My friend told me that one
of the projects the Ford Foundation was
considering was a largish grant to the
World Service to keep alive what it
thought was an international asset.
Take
Shostakovics Violine Concerto no 2,
written for and played by David Oistrakh.
Take a series on the lives of Mendelssohn
and Mozart, Edward Greenfield playing
classical requests from his endless
collection which brought Maria Callas and
Elisabeth Schwarzkopf. Take the musical
quizzes with three participants and a
moderator, where else could I have heard
them with such startling clarity? Because
the BBC has so very many Indian listeners
there is an attempt now to slot in
programmes with an Indian content. An
interview-demonstration, for instance, by
Rave Shankar and his daughter. Not so
hot, Im afraid. Maybe the English
programmes over Deutschewelle and Dutch
Radio are also good, I have heard their
news programmes but never such a
glittering array as the BBC produces, For
instance, I had never imagined that
programmes about religion in Focus on
Faith or patterns of Faith could be so
fascinating or one on the icons of
Cyprus, that Third World issues could be
batted out so frankly. For young
people-and older ones like me-there is
the BBC World History and I was thrilled
by a programme on slavery. Than there was
new writing and new music under the wrap
of Meridian.
Every now
and again there was something to get
indignant about. In a programme on Le
Corbusier on his birthday one of the
participants, very knowledgeable about
Chandigarth and who has visited it
several times, said that Le Corbusier had
thought that India would be the
"watershed" between past
history and modern technology and then
added. "But alas, that didnt
happen".
There is
more than a smitch of truth about the
remark but where has one planned city
changed the course of history and the
trends in a country? The technology of
exceptional high grade done anything to
change the US having the largest prison
population in the world or of 30 per cent
of British children (according to UNICEF)
living under conditions of poverty?
After a
good many years I heard the icon-like
Alistair Cookes Letter from
America. I had always taken him for a
liberal. But over the China Straits
affair he fully supported the US policy
of putting the cushion below Taiwan with
huge arms supplies, planes and ships,
forgetting that another journalist, at
least as distinguished as Alistair Cooke,
Walter Lippman, had urged a "Two
Chinas" policy decades ago at a time
when the US allowed a pimple like Taiwan
to represent in the UN the most populous
nation in the world and Cabot Lodge kept
tilting against the windmill for years.
Who even remembers him now? Cooke was
very incensed at the US losing out on
several committee of the UNs Human
rights Commission but omitted to mention
that the US had not signed the Kyoto
Protocol on global warming or the one on
the proposal for an International
Criminal Court. He had a world of praise
for Woodrwo Wilson who is rated in
history as one of the most radical of
American president and Cooke had some
very snide remarks for Yasser Arafat. One
had the wish to take up a pen and write
to the BBCs Write On or some other
reaction programme.
It was
wonderful to hear Ibn Batuta given the
appellation of "the greatest travel
writer of the world". A six-part
series on Jesus Christ was narrated by
the great actor Sir Derek Jacobi and
Jesus was described as the most
influential man in history, but I feel
sure that a series on Buddha would have
been just as inspiring. But, as I said
before, I have nothing against the Focus
on Faith and Patterns of Faith
programmes.
The people
called on for comment (not just political
but on science, psychology, etc.) are
still mainly Britons and American, beamed
as they are to India there are now quite
frequent Briton of Indian origin and some
Africans but few continental voices and
almost none from Japan, Egypt, Indonesia,
Cuba or Latin America. That is, I think,
one obstruction to the BBCs being
called a World Service. But what a treat
it was to hear Noam Chomsky on Agenda
calling the US "the largest rogue
state in the world", giving reasons.
Its
not London alone I heard. Dhaka and
Kolkata also came in very clearly.
Bengali spoken from Dhaka is much better
than from Kolkata and there is a rash of
phone-in programmes in both the
countries. Womens Hour produces
discussions in Bengali which though good
are but badly produced and hence with
much too long passages. School quizzes in
Bangladesh were appallingly poor. Apart
from lovely rural songs and of course,
the ever fresh Rabindra Sangeet there was
the endless caterwauling of modern songs.
As a compensation, I heard one early
morning from Dhaka a replay of
Mujeebs speech in 1971 when he said
: "This time the fight is for
independence".
What
impressed me in the Letter Programmes was
the immense hunger of people, women and
men in the villages and small towns, for
more information for the sparking off of
new ideas and for entertainment which
they are obviously not getting. Even if
we couldnt do then just as well as
the BBC there is much, much that we can
do and probably never will.
Of course
it would have to be for English medium
schools only, though even that is
something. But if our upper-form school
students and college students have a
compulsory listening session of the BBC
World Service they would gain enormously.
They could start with the 60-minute
Newshour. That would have to be
voluntary, perhaps, because it is in the
evenings. As I said, from the latters
from villages and small towns about the
Bengali Womens Hour programmes, I
learnt there is great hunger for
information. To give an example, I
remember reading once in <I
>The
Times of London <P>that the British
Council Library in Kolkata in Theatre
Road, (now Shakespeare Sarani) was the
most used Council Library in the world.
Returning
form Kolkata I didnt press button
my television for ten whole days.
Didnt miss it at all. Indian
television is getting crammed with
copycat programmes from the BBC. Why not
a few copycat radio programmes?INAV
|
 |
Will
society lend a ear to Homosexuals?
By Uma
Ramachandran
The lunch
break during the conference on gays,
lesbians, kotis, transgendered and
bisexuals is lively. There is friendly
banter all around. Dipika, Working for
the Sangini project at the Naz
Foundation, among other organisations
present at the meeting, teases another
girl, "Let me give you a kiss, Oh,
but public mein problem hoga,no?"
Another joins the conversation, and it
all seems very regular.
And, it
is. For them. And for the others at the
conference. They seem comfortable, one
gay boy can be seen applying mehndi for
another, while others sit primly
listening to the discussions. Outside, it
is a different story. Unless, you are
lucky, like Dipika. "I am safe,
because I can pass
as straight. I
have known since I was 10 that I was a
lesbian. Little things about me were
different. Like, when I walked down the
road, I didnt look down at the road
like other girls, I looked around."
She has come out in the open in society,
but says, "If I am living with a
female partner, will I have the courage
to own up to it or let it pass?"
Kathy
(name changed) is from the UK. She is
teased when she walks down the streets in
her country. "In India, homophobia
is ingrained, it is not over."
Boyish looking Pamela (name
changed), 27, from California, agrees,
"Back home, people can tell from the
way I look. And, they hate people like
us. My friends have even been beaten up
on the streets." Her father was also
homosexual and realised it only after his
marriage. It only made her question her
sexuality even more and coming out took
that much longer. Her father, she says,
is proud of her for discovering herself
so early, and her mother and brother have
come to terms with it after seeing her
happy with her new friends.
Friends
are difficult to find in India. Dipika
says, "It is difficult finding and
meeting women one can fall in love
with." The community is small, with
few coming out.
Bixexuals
find themselves on the other side of the
divide. They can be part of neither
group. Nimmi (name changed), who prefers
to call himself homosexual, since other
than men, the only woman he has been
attached to his wife, He also has a
four-year-old daughter, who questions him
sometimes about his wearing mehndi.
"I am preparing my daughter for
later. I tell her that sometimes men like
to dress like women and vice-versa."
He sees himself as a woman and left home
after he was forced to marry. Later, he
came out into the open with his wife who
accepted his attraction towards men. Life
has settled into a groove after that.
Not so for
Akshay (name changed). "I cant
tell you of the trauma I undergo with my
wife. I just cant be myself and
dont enjoy my physical relationship
with her. Whenever she goes to her
parents place, I put on her clothes
and make-up and feel at peace. A woman
doesnt have to do things to feel
like one. But, I know I am not a woman,
and doing this makes me happy," he
says.
Ajay (name
changed), a happy-go-lucky bisexual, was
shaky when he decided to come out at the
conference. His first marriage ended
after 46 days when he confided in his
wife about his bisexuality. His second
wife is still with him, despite knowing
of his preferences. Sex is a natural
fallout interaction and mental
compatibility, he believes, and love may
or may not be a part of it.
"Sometimes, I feel the need to for a
man and a woman together and recently, a
group of us came together during a
party."
Psychotherapist
Neeru Kanwar would look at the safety
aspect of such activities rather than the
moral or ethical point of view. "It
is important that the individual and his
or her partners practice safe sex and
come together only after informed
consent," she says.
She also
feels that homosexuality or bisexuality
are caused by neurological and hormonal
factors and cannot be
"treated." One can only counsel
and let the individual decide his
sexuality for himself, she says.
Gay
activist Shaleen Rakesh recently filed a
complaint with the National Human Rights
Commission (NHRC) on the grounds that the
Indian Psychiatric Association has not
recognised homosexuality as normal
behaviour. He says. "A boy was given
non-prescription drugs and put through
aversion therapy and hypnosis at AIIMS to
cure him of
homosexuality."
The NHRC
in another report said that the concern
was not one of human rights but a social
problem. While they draft a formal reply
to Rakeshs complaint, Dr Sandeep
Vohra, president of the Delhi Psychiatric
Society and member of the Indian
Psychiatric Association says
homosexuality is already accepted as
normal by the medical fraternity.
"We follow the guidelines given by
the WHO under its International
Classification of Diseases, which is
updated every 20 years. Currently, it is
the ICDX which is in practice, and
according to this, sexual orientation
alone is not to be regarded as a
disorder. For instance, when a
psychiatrist treats a depressed
homosexual, he is looking to cure the
depression, not the homosexuality."
He
empathieses with Rakeshs need for a
formal stand on the issue, but says,
"It is understood by us that the WHO
guidelines are being followed. There has
never been any need to pass a resolution
to that effect. However, I will be
putting up the issue before the Indian
Psychiatric Association."
Aversion
therapy, he says, is given in cases when
an adolescent is confused about his
sexuality and has had fleeting sexual
encounters with members of the same sex
which have led to him feeling guilty.
"They are showed of pictures of men
and women, and given shocks when pictures
of males are viewed," he says.
Dr Kanwar,
however, says, "This amounts to
punishing the patient and not allowing
him to respect what he feels," she
says, Homosexuality, he says, can be of
egodystonic and egosystonic. The second
is the state where the individual is
convinced of his or her orientation.
"They do not come to us," he
says. The first usually occurs between
the age of 12 and 18 when it "is
technically possible to have sex with
either sex. Sexuality can be fluid at his
time, and the adolescent is still
figuring his or her sexual identity, be
it gay, lesbian or bisexual." He
terms it "sexual maturation
confusion," but stresses that it is
certainly not a disorder. He says
homosexuality is a result of a
combination of factors social,
biological and genetic. The absence of a
father figure and dominant women at home
can affect a males psyche, but only
if accompanied by other socio, genetic
and biological factors. They can also be
exceptionally gifted and brilliant he
accepts, without glorifying them.
Being
transgendered, or feeling one is a man
trapped in a womans body and
vice-versa is a disorder, he says. The
only cure is a sex change, he says. Here,
too, they treat the body, not
"curing" what the individual
feels. In Delhi, complaints against
psychiatrists can be addressed to a
committee set up by the Delhi Psychiatric
Society, he says.
Delhi-based
clinical psychologist Sadhana Vohara,
member of the Psychological Foundation, a
trust which was established to facilitate
the work of clinical psychologists,
believes homosexuality is not a disorder
and has no problems giving a written
statement to that effect. "If I
asked to do so, I will have no problems
doing so," she says.
Gays also
face other problems, namely, harassment
under section 377 of the Indian Penal
code, which prohibits any "carnal
intercourse against the order of
nature." Rohit (name changed), a
gay, says he was once picked up by a
policemen in plain clothes. "He told
me his wife and kids were not home, When
I saw his uniform hanging there, I was
scared, But, he forced me, threatening me
with section 377." Also raising a
voice are the kotis, the
female partners in gay
couples. A Delhi-based organisation, who
will take up their cause, says,
"They look up to the man who abuses
them physically and mentally."
"It will be soon a war of economics,
with only the affluent ones being able to
take care of themselves." About time
for society at large to lend a ear! INAV
|
|
A
minority in disarray
By Sarvadaman
Toynbee's 'A study
of History' must be introduced at College level
if students want to know the spirit of history.
Toynbee was one of the greatest historians of the
present times. His remarkable fascination with
civilizations of the world led him to undertake
one of the most difficult projects to study
various civilizations; their birth, growth and
decline. Finally he came to the conclusion that
it is the creative minority which is the be-all
and end-all of civilizations. At the stage of
ascendency, creative minority is able to lead
majority in proper direction. No questions are
asked as no illusions are there. This creative
minority freed India of foreign yoke. Mahatama
Gandhi and Patel were men of vision. Their eyes
were set on distant goals not immediate gains.
Thus one became Father of the Nation and the
other consolidator. Both have achieved
immortality.
Coming to present
times, there is not a single man or woman whom
majority loves, and respects or is willing even
to listen. This view can be corroborated by
events in Eastern Region of India. Central Govt's
ceasefire with Nationalist Socialist Council of
Nagaland (NSCN) even outside Nagaland created
volatile situation there. This thoughtless policy
put in action without taking any Chief Minister
into confidence, reveals the bankruptcy of the
art of governance.
In ancient India
the princes were placed under competent teachers
to learn the art of ruling. Numerous examples
were cited to derive home the reality of
politics. Mahabharata, Arthshastra and
Panchatantra formed compulsory courses of study.
No doubt a rulersown I. Q played a major part in
upbringing. For example both Kaurvas and Pandavas
studies under Saint Dronacharya but each chose
one's own path. But now any ABC can claim to lead
this nation of one billion peoples. So where does
the differences lie. The majority, which appears
to have gone dumb except when shouting slogans.
And who are the members of the creative minority?
No need to highlight their names which would be
reduced to foot notes of history. These so called
the leader's are adept at hoodwinking their own
countrymen. They change their statements with
such speed that there remains nothing. Their
policies and programmes are bereft of any long
term gains. These leaders live by hours and the
people of India appear to be a huge mass of
people without any direction. Toynbee refers to
this stage as the most dangerous one leading to
the fall of civilizations. Both creative minority
and majority drift apart. The former is selfish,
short sighted and lacks character. Thus there is
total absence of any inspiration and the
majority, also selfish, self centred and seeped
in luxury, does not bother to listen to any one.
In such a stage of inertia four type of leaders
emerge. Those who want to stem the rot through
wise counsil but fail, second, those who desire
to change through force. Third group tries
violence i.e by sword and the last one comprises
of people who are sincere but helpless and they
withdraw.
Anyone reading
this article can draw their own conclusion as to
at what stage we have reached. Those who are
honest, sincere are the big sufferers. The
shrewd, cunning are applauded while wise are
tortured. The patriotic are sidelined, the
destabilizers are well looked after, the dunce
are at the forefront and the intelligent pushed
to the sidelines. Kalhana, the celebrated
historian of Kashmir, must have felt sad when he
wrote about his contemporaries that in the reign
of some medieval kings, the Vagabond, Croks and
cheats had monopolised the levers of Government
while the scholars had been begging on the
streets. And another Kashmir historian, Jonaraja
has penned four verses, yes only four verses
about a ruler named Bopadev. And just hold your
breath, this ruler ruled Kashmir for ten long
years, So you would think why his long history
has been said only in four verses. It is because
two verses refer to his extreme low intellect.
For example this king, on his coronation day,
felt very sad to see small pebbles and big
boulders. He ordered that small stones might be
fed with milk to grow into big stones. In the
fourth verse the great historian asked his
readers to forgive him to end the narration as
his ink was becoming dirtier.
No one among the
one billion people is asking as what dramatic
change has occured which forced BJP Leaders to
invite Parvez Musharraf for talks. For long these
leaders were shouting that till cross border
terrorism was not stopped no talks could be held.
One of the many qualities of a leader is that one
should be consistent. Pervez Musharraf is shrewd
man. He would come prepared with full confidence
as the Pakistani leaders always do their home
work with perfection. Indian leaders could have
appealed to his emotions and demanded freedom for
prisoners of war held in Pak Jails since 1965,
1971 Wars. And chances where Musharaff would have
listened as his most fervent wish had been
fulfilled. His humane side might have triumphed a
while but who cares for those who die for
country. Look at the knee jerk reaction at the
most barbaric treatment of Bangladeshi Soldiers
with our BSF Jawans. And contrast this with
China's reaction over losing just, yes, just one
pilot and that too in mid air collision. With
American plane. American President had to face
China's outburst. This is how leaders lead the
nation and make them assertive, bold and proud.
China is not still in a position to challenge the
American might but pride is cardinal aspect of
their character which has been their driving
force.
We have democracy,
elected representatives, alert media and watchful
judiciary. Yet where lie the shortcoming. Perhaps
you and I need not stress our brains why! because
Miss J Jayalalitha has laid bare the holes in our
system. Her example shows that power directly
affects the mind and body and under its
intoxication, one gets blurred vision, and gets
easily transformed into another realm. And like
the French emperor Louis XIVth, one starts
muttering ''I AM THE STATE''
|
North
East: A time bomb
By Maj Gen V K Madhok
(retired)
Absence of
statesmenship and political will have resulted in
postponment of one crucial political decision
after the other in India's Northeast (NE).
Boundaries, authority and scope of Bodo
Autonomous Council in relation to Assam have yet
to be resolved, which will be even more difficult
with a Congress Government in power in Guwahati
which may not heed Centre's dictat.
As regards the
latest turmoil in Manipur after the cease fire
agreement with the NSCN (IM); Assam, Tripura and
Manipur are up in arms. Their Chief Ministers
were not consulted about the extension of cease
fire to Nagas outside Nagaland before signing the
deal on Jun 4,2001. Besides, once again there has
been an intelligence failure to forecast likely
repurcussions by the States and their citizens to
such unpleasant policies. In addition, foreign
interests (specially arms exporters), a colonial
attitude of "we and they" and inept
media reporting leading to the resultant
isolation of seven NE States are factors, which
have led to the present faux pau.
In the latest
tragedy, the chief players happen to be: The
Governor, Mr Ved Marwah an ex Police Officer, Mr
Padmanabhiah - reemployed bureaucrat, ex Home
Secretary who has sufficient experience of
Governance and who was Centre's emissary who
negotiated the cease fire with the NSCN (IM) and
recommended that cease fire be made applicable to
Nagas outside Nagaland as well. While giving
credit to this officers for handling the
situation in Manipur, Marwah says that he was not
consulted. On the other hand Padmanabhiah justies
the deal by arguing that it was arrived at to
create a suitable environment for peace talks.
Obviously, both cannot get away with these
statements. Nor can the Home Minister - the final
authority who accepted recommendations and issued
orders for enforcement of the cease fire.
The situation in
the NE today is: That a large number of nearly
four lac Nagas - citizens of Manipur, have fled
their home State for safer pastures. That nearly
a dozen odd Para Military Forces (PMF) like the
ITBP, CRPF, CISF, RPF, Assam Rifles, India
Reserve Battalions, DSC, Armed Police, Rapid
Reaction forces and more than half a dozen
intelligence outfits, in addition to
approximately six lac troops including TA and the
IAF are busy fighting the ongoing secessionist
movements like the Bodos, ULFA, NLFT, NSCN, PLA
of Manipur and so on. Or gaurding the border,
with Gorkhaland and Greater Nepal movements
waiting in the wings. Rightly, the arms merchants
have seen a window of opportunity and as such are
fuelling the fires of discontent and thus have
made NE as the most flourishing arms market in
the world. This does not end here. Because arms
require replacements, spares and the insurgents
need newer technologies and latest weaponary. And
with India's indigenous programmes in the dumps
the arms dealers have a field day. They will make
every effort that the situation worsens instead
of improving. They don't want their arms
factories to close down.
Besides, the Home
Minister and the Prime Minister are hesitant to
review the cease fire agreement. Their fears,
which are genuine, are that if the agreement is
altered the NSCN (IM) will resort to violence and
there will be no agreements in the future. If no
action is taken, the People's Liberation Army of
Manipur and All Manipur Students Union will
continue to boycott the Government and not let it
function. The Centre as such has got itself in a
major fix my mishandling the situations.
This situation has
been fully exploited by Pakistan's ISI who have
been actively involved in assisting and
coordinating actions of various movements to
achieve their interests. Thus, bent on creating a
political platform -like the Hurriyat in J&K,
initially to be launched from Pakistan's embassy
in Kathmandu and which will include all the seven
NE States, it is successfully moving towards
instigating a second proxy war-with bases in
Bangladesh, Myanmar, Bhutan and Nepal.
What needs to be
done? It appears that the Government has no
option but to review the deal and delete the
extension clause besides giving it in writing,
that there will be no alteration of State
boundries. And for once, admit the failure in not
consulting the Chief Ministers of the affected
States (Assam, Manipur and Tripura). Further, two
posts of Deputy Home Ministers, one each for
dealing with NE and J&K respectively, should
be created. The Home Minister is too busy.
Further, he cannot depend on solutions
recommended by bureaucrats. The Deputy Ministers
should preferably function from Guwahati and
Kashmir respectively. In addition, the moribund
National Integration Council needs to be revived.
And there is no reason as to why the PM's office
cannot function for short periods from Guwahati
if it could do so from the Breach Candy Hospital.
Further, an accountable Unified Command needs to
be set up while the political process moves on.
The NE needs a
political solution. The more it is delayed it
would become more difficult and complex. The
security forces and the bureaucrats cannot
resolve the situation. They are merely tools in
the hands of the Government. Finally the message
is loud and clear: Should the secessionists
succeed in waging a second proxy war with ISI's
help, China postured in the background, with
bases in the neighbouring countries, the proxy
war in J&K will look like a child's play. It
will present a scenario where the Government will
be kept busy at its flanks. The Government will
not be able to deal with the situation and
therefore, that will be the first visible signs
as well as steps towards disintegration of the
Indian State.
|
 |
| |
 |
|