EDITORIAL

SCHOOLS WITH
WEAPONS

A news item from the Dawn of Pakistan says that the military Government in that country is thinking of imposing a ban on military training in religious schools and withdrawing weapons from the inmates. There are more than fifty thousand madrassahs (seminaries) throughout the length and breadth of the country. Some of these are quite large and imposing ones with elaborate. .....more

PRIVATE SCHOOLS

Complaints against private schools have been piling up. These are mostly about exorbitant admission and monthly tuition fees charged by these schools. Apart from these two heads, the students are asked to pay frequently for one or the other pretext. Thus parents are fleeced because they must give education to their wards. A general notion and a false notion is that the parents who are eager to send their wards to private schools are evidently financially strong enough to pay......more

Going radio ga-ga retreat

By Sandip Bhattacharya
I was exiled to a desert island recently. Not quite. I spent a long month in an old tumble down house in an eastern city. The house had no television, a small palm-held radio of uncertain volume, no car and I didn’t have a great...
more

Will society lend a
ear to Homosexuals?

By Uma Ramachandran
The lunch break during the conference on gays, lesbians, kotis, transgendered and bisexuals is lively. There is friendly banter all around. Dipika, Working for the Sangini project at the Naz Foundation, among other....
more

A minority in disarray

By Sarvadaman
Toynbee's 'A study of History' must be introduced at College level if students want to know the spirit of history. Toynbee was one of the greatest historians of the present times. His remarkable fascination with civilizations........
more

North East: A time bomb

By Maj Gen V K Madhok (retired)
Absence of statesmenship and political will have resulted in postponment of one crucial political decision after the other in India's Northeast (NE). Boundaries, authority and scope of Bodo. ........
more

EDITORIAL

SCHOOLS WITH WEAPONS

A news item from the Dawn of Pakistan says that the military Government in that country is thinking of imposing a ban on military training in religious schools and withdrawing weapons from the inmates. There are more than fifty thousand madrassahs (seminaries) throughout the length and breadth of the country. Some of these are quite large and imposing ones with elaborate arrangements for the board and lodging of the students. The seminaries engage teachers well versed in Islamic learning, some without salaries because they consider it a service to the propagation of Islam. Pakistani officials claim that thousands of pieces of weapons have been voluntarily deposited with the Government when an announcement was made that the unlicensed arms should be deposited. Although the truth of recovery of such a large number of weapons remains to be ascertained, nevertheless this gives an idea of the extent to which Pakistani society has been weaponised and for what purpose?

But gun is the essential part of the curricula and training at the current madrassahs of Pakistani brand. The main teaching in these seminaries is of jihad. Now to think that a Pakistani student at the seminaries is ultimately required to wage a jihad without weapons is tantamount to converting him to Gandhian creed. As such, a jihad comes closer to Gandhian philosophy in the interpretation of the current military rule in Pakistan. One wonders if the Pakistani civil society will agree to become the Gandhiates and bid farewell to arms? But those who run the madrassahs and those who recruit the outgoing students from these seminaries have pledged to wage the armed struggle till India is Islamised and Islamic flag is hoisted atop the Red Fort. A Pakistani madrassah without the gun and gun culture is like a fish out of water. The two situations are irreconcilable. At the same time, a student from this type of seminary in Pakistan, meaning a student loaded with puritanical Islamic ideology minus a gun is much more dangerous than one carrying a gun. A fanatical mullah in the mosque is to be feared more than the jihadi with a gun stalking the streets and suburbs.

The drive to "de-weaponise" religious and fundamentalist groups in Pakistan has been dismissed by a section of local media as a sham with the Pervez Musharraf regime publicising minor efforts to recover weapons to pacify international community while desisting from carrying out these drives against known militant outfits. The military regime, which declared in last week of May an amnesty to encourage surrender of weapons from militant or fundamentalist groups, has so far failed to get a good response from these outfits and the recovery has been low. Wrote one columnist," As it is, critics do not think the Government has even done its homework…If they can even achieve 40 per cent success, that would be amazing". Another paper wrote that after six days of amnesty period to surrender illicit arms voluntarily, the general public has deposited 3,988 weapons and 15,234 rounds of ammunition." Among these the highest number of deposited weapons came from NWFP, followed by Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and Islamabad. There were no recoveries from PoK. Whatever the case, scepticism about the de-weaponisation drive of the Pakistani military regime appears to be justified. Another paper wanted to know if the Government indeed had some data on arms, has identified the groups in possession of such weapons, knows the seminaries where arms are stored, then what is stopping it from moving in? Why should the Government simply give warnings and keep extending the amnesty deadline? It is logical that such groups would hide their weapons or take other measures against the drive. It will be recalled that such an operation was earlier carried out in Sindh in 1992, but it got bogged down with political issues and the tussle between the ISI and the military intelligence. One columnist even went to the length of giving the list of major militant organisations, which were, knows for their weapon strength but not touched by the Musharraf regime in its "de-weaponisation" drive. These include Jaish-e-Muhammad, LeT and some others. A report in the Dawn said the military regime launched the drive following a warning by the USD, especially during the recent visit to Islamabad of the CIA chief, George Tenet, to keep the international community in "good humour". Yet another report said that barely 48 hours before the de-weaponisation campaign was to kick off, the Government released two leaders and nearly 10 activists of militant Barelvi Sunni Tehreek. They were arrested for possession of weapons and disturbing peace and cases of high treason were registered against them. In this scenario, there cannot be much hope that the Government is too serious about de-weaponisation programme or stopping the madrassahs from giving arms training to the students.

PRIVATE SCHOOLS

Complaints against private schools have been piling up. These are mostly about exorbitant admission and monthly tuition fees charged by these schools. Apart from these two heads, the students are asked to pay frequently for one or the other pretext. Thus parents are fleeced because they must give education to their wards. A general notion and a false notion is that the parents who are eager to send their wards to private schools are evidently financially strong enough to pay the heavy fees. This wrong notion has to be dispelled. Essentially the parents want their wards to have better environment and culture which, somehow, has been the privilege of many private schools. It is a natural instinct that the parents would not want their wards to go into the wrong company. That does not mean that they should be fleeced for this small and natural desire.

The Consumer Council has received numerous complaints against private schools charging heavy fees. The meeting called by the Education Minister of the Consumer Council and the Association of Private Schools is a right step to address the problem. The advice of the Minister that the private schools should fix a norm for charging the fees according to their standard and that they should avoid demand arbitrary fee. It is a right step that every private school forms an advisory committee in which the parents are also members and it lays down the norms for that particular school. This is all fine but the real responsibility rests with the government itself. The Government should also intervene in the matter actively because ultimately unless the Government gives recognition to a school, it cannot function. Giving recognition means that the school should observe basic norms laid down by the Government. The fixation of fees and other charges should also form the part of those norms. This is a step that government should not lose sight of.

Going radio ga-ga retreat

By Sandip Bhattacharya

I was exiled to a desert island recently. Not quite. I spent a long month in an old tumble down house in an eastern city. The house had no television, a small palm-held radio of uncertain volume, no car and I didn’t have a great deal to do. So it was like a desert island. The books I had read, most of them, during earlier stays over the years. There was no Sarat Chatterjee or Bankim Chandra collections and only on a few scattered volumes of Tagore. I re-red old classics like Thomas Hardy’s. The Return of the Native, Charles Margan’s The Judge Story, an old Penguin edition of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure and the Penguin book of Comic and Curious Verse. In the desert I had one redeeming asset – a powerful 15-band radio and the BBC World Service. They enriched my month.

International affairs, music, religion, debate, discussions, world history, interviews, interview-cum-discussions, musical quiz programme, sport, science, travel, woman’s hour, foreign correspondent’s dispatches, all these I listened to and the end product was immensely satisfying. Quite a few years ago, I used to know the head of the cultural department of the Ford Foundation who had his office in Paris near the Arc de Triomphe. It was a time when British governments, particularly Conservative ones, were forever threatening to prune grant to the BBC World Service. My friend told me that one of the projects the Ford Foundation was considering was a largish grant to the World Service to keep alive what it thought was an international asset.

Take Shostakovic’s Violine Concerto no 2, written for and played by David Oistrakh. Take a series on the lives of Mendelssohn and Mozart, Edward Greenfield playing classical requests from his endless collection which brought Maria Callas and Elisabeth Schwarzkopf. Take the musical quizzes with three participants and a moderator, where else could I have heard them with such startling clarity? Because the BBC has so very many Indian listeners there is an attempt now to slot in programmes with an Indian content. An interview-demonstration, for instance, by Rave Shankar and his daughter. Not so hot, I’m afraid. Maybe the English programmes over Deutschewelle and Dutch Radio are also good, I have heard their news programmes but never such a glittering array as the BBC produces, For instance, I had never imagined that programmes about religion in Focus on Faith or patterns of Faith could be so fascinating or one on the icons of Cyprus, that Third World issues could be batted out so frankly. For young people-and older ones like me-there is the BBC World History and I was thrilled by a programme on slavery. Than there was new writing and new music under the wrap of Meridian.

Every now and again there was something to get indignant about. In a programme on Le Corbusier on his birthday one of the participants, very knowledgeable about Chandigarth and who has visited it several times, said that Le Corbusier had thought that India would be the "watershed" between past history and modern technology and then added. "But alas, that didn’t happen".

There is more than a smitch of truth about the remark but where has one planned city changed the course of history and the trends in a country? The technology of exceptional high grade done anything to change the US having the largest prison population in the world or of 30 per cent of British children (according to UNICEF) living under conditions of poverty?

After a good many years I heard the icon-like Alistair Cooke’s Letter from America. I had always taken him for a liberal. But over the China Straits affair he fully supported the US policy of putting the cushion below Taiwan with huge arms supplies, planes and ships, forgetting that another journalist, at least as distinguished as Alistair Cooke, Walter Lippman, had urged a "Two Chinas" policy decades ago at a time when the US allowed a pimple like Taiwan to represent in the UN the most populous nation in the world and Cabot Lodge kept tilting against the windmill for years. Who even remembers him now? Cooke was very incensed at the US losing out on several committee of the UN’s Human rights Commission but omitted to mention that the US had not signed the Kyoto Protocol on global warming or the one on the proposal for an International Criminal Court. He had a world of praise for Woodrwo Wilson who is rated in history as one of the most radical of American president and Cooke had some very snide remarks for Yasser Arafat. One had the wish to take up a pen and write to the BBC’s Write On or some other reaction programme.

It was wonderful to hear Ibn Batuta given the appellation of "the greatest travel writer of the world". A six-part series on Jesus Christ was narrated by the great actor Sir Derek Jacobi and Jesus was described as the most influential man in history, but I feel sure that a series on Buddha would have been just as inspiring. But, as I said before, I have nothing against the Focus on Faith and Patterns of Faith programmes.

The people called on for comment (not just political but on science, psychology, etc.) are still mainly Britons and American, beamed as they are to India there are now quite frequent Briton of Indian origin and some Africans but few continental voices and almost none from Japan, Egypt, Indonesia, Cuba or Latin America. That is, I think, one obstruction to the BBC’s being called a World Service. But what a treat it was to hear Noam Chomsky on Agenda calling the US "the largest rogue state in the world", giving reasons.

It’s not London alone I heard. Dhaka and Kolkata also came in very clearly. Bengali spoken from Dhaka is much better than from Kolkata and there is a rash of phone-in programmes in both the countries. Women’s Hour produces discussions in Bengali which though good are but badly produced and hence with much too long passages. School quizzes in Bangladesh were appallingly poor. Apart from lovely rural songs and of course, the ever fresh Rabindra Sangeet there was the endless caterwauling of modern songs. As a compensation, I heard one early morning from Dhaka a replay of Mujeeb’s speech in 1971 when he said : "This time the fight is for independence".

What impressed me in the Letter Programmes was the immense hunger of people, women and men in the villages and small towns, for more information for the sparking off of new ideas and for entertainment which they are obviously not getting. Even if we couldn’t do then just as well as the BBC there is much, much that we can do – and probably never will.

Of course it would have to be for English medium schools only, though even that is something. But if our upper-form school students and college students have a compulsory listening session of the BBC World Service they would gain enormously. They could start with the 60-minute Newshour. That would have to be voluntary, perhaps, because it is in the evenings. As I said, from the latters from villages and small towns about the Bengali Women’s Hour programmes, I learnt there is great hunger for information. To give an example, I remember reading once in <I

>The Times of London <P>that the British Council Library in Kolkata in Theatre Road, (now Shakespeare Sarani) was the most used Council Library in the world.

Returning form Kolkata I didn’t press button my television for ten whole days. Didn’t miss it at all. Indian television is getting crammed with copycat programmes from the BBC. Why not a few copycat radio programmes?INAV

Will society lend a ear to Homosexuals?

By Uma Ramachandran

The lunch break during the conference on gays, lesbians, kotis, transgendered and bisexuals is lively. There is friendly banter all around. Dipika, Working for the Sangini project at the Naz Foundation, among other organisations present at the meeting, teases another girl, "Let me give you a kiss, Oh, but public mein problem hoga,no?" Another joins the conversation, and it all seems very regular.

And, it is. For them. And for the others at the conference. They seem comfortable, one gay boy can be seen applying mehndi for another, while others sit primly listening to the discussions. Outside, it is a different story. Unless, you are lucky, like Dipika. "I am safe, because I can pass… as straight. I have known since I was 10 that I was a lesbian. Little things about me were different. Like, when I walked down the road, I didn’t look down at the road like other girls, I looked around." She has come out in the open in society, but says, "If I am living with a female partner, will I have the courage to own up to it or let it pass?"

Kathy (name changed) is from the UK. She is teased when she walks down the streets in her country. "In India, homophobia is ingrained, it is not over." Boyish – looking Pamela (name changed), 27, from California, agrees, "Back home, people can tell from the way I look. And, they hate people like us. My friends have even been beaten up on the streets." Her father was also homosexual and realised it only after his marriage. It only made her question her sexuality even more and coming out took that much longer. Her father, she says, is proud of her for discovering herself so early, and her mother and brother have come to terms with it after seeing her happy with her new friends.

Friends are difficult to find in India. Dipika says, "It is difficult finding and meeting women one can fall in love with." The community is small, with few coming out.

Bixexuals find themselves on the other side of the divide. They can be part of neither group. Nimmi (name changed), who prefers to call himself homosexual, since other than men, the only woman he has been attached to his wife, He also has a four-year-old daughter, who questions him sometimes about his wearing mehndi. "I am preparing my daughter for later. I tell her that sometimes men like to dress like women and vice-versa." He sees himself as a woman and left home after he was forced to marry. Later, he came out into the open with his wife who accepted his attraction towards men. Life has settled into a groove after that.

Not so for Akshay (name changed). "I can’t tell you of the trauma I undergo with my wife. I just can’t be myself and don’t enjoy my physical relationship with her. Whenever she goes to her parents’ place, I put on her clothes and make-up and feel at peace. A woman doesn’t have to do things to feel like one. But, I know I am not a woman, and doing this makes me happy," he says.

Ajay (name changed), a happy-go-lucky bisexual, was shaky when he decided to come out at the conference. His first marriage ended after 46 days when he confided in his wife about his bisexuality. His second wife is still with him, despite knowing of his preferences. Sex is a natural fallout interaction and mental compatibility, he believes, and love may or may not be a part of it. "Sometimes, I feel the need to for a man and a woman together and recently, a group of us came together during a party."

Psychotherapist Neeru Kanwar would look at the safety aspect of such activities rather than the moral or ethical point of view. "It is important that the individual and his or her partners practice safe sex and come together only after informed consent," she says.

She also feels that homosexuality or bisexuality are caused by neurological and hormonal factors and cannot be "treated." One can only counsel and let the individual decide his sexuality for himself, she says.

Gay activist Shaleen Rakesh recently filed a complaint with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on the grounds that the Indian Psychiatric Association has not recognised homosexuality as normal behaviour. He says. "A boy was given non-prescription drugs and put through aversion therapy and hypnosis at AIIMS to ‘cure’ him of homosexuality."

The NHRC in another report said that the concern was not one of human rights but a social problem. While they draft a formal reply to Rakesh’s complaint, Dr Sandeep Vohra, president of the Delhi Psychiatric Society and member of the Indian Psychiatric Association says homosexuality is already accepted as normal by the medical fraternity. "We follow the guidelines given by the WHO under its International Classification of Diseases, which is updated every 20 years. Currently, it is the ICDX which is in practice, and according to this, sexual orientation alone is not to be regarded as a disorder. For instance, when a psychiatrist treats a depressed homosexual, he is looking to cure the depression, not the homosexuality."

He empathieses with Rakesh’s need for a formal stand on the issue, but says, "It is understood by us that the WHO guidelines are being followed. There has never been any need to pass a resolution to that effect. However, I will be putting up the issue before the Indian Psychiatric Association."

Aversion therapy, he says, is given in cases when an adolescent is confused about his sexuality and has had fleeting sexual encounters with members of the same sex which have led to him feeling guilty. "They are showed of pictures of men and women, and given shocks when pictures of males are viewed," he says.

Dr Kanwar, however, says, "This amounts to punishing the patient and not allowing him to respect what he feels," she says, Homosexuality, he says, can be of egodystonic and egosystonic. The second is the state where the individual is convinced of his or her orientation. "They do not come to us," he says. The first usually occurs between the age of 12 and 18 when it "is technically possible to have sex with either sex. Sexuality can be fluid at his time, and the adolescent is still figuring his or her sexual identity, be it gay, lesbian or bisexual." He terms it "sexual maturation confusion," but stresses that it is certainly not a disorder. He says homosexuality is a result of a combination of factors – social, biological and genetic. The absence of a father figure and dominant women at home can affect a male’s psyche, but only if accompanied by other socio, genetic and biological factors. They can also be exceptionally gifted and brilliant he accepts, without glorifying them.

Being transgendered, or feeling one is a man trapped in a woman’s body and vice-versa is a disorder, he says. The only cure is a sex change, he says. Here, too, they treat the body, not "curing" what the individual feels. In Delhi, complaints against psychiatrists can be addressed to a committee set up by the Delhi Psychiatric Society, he says.

Delhi-based clinical psychologist Sadhana Vohara, member of the Psychological Foundation, a trust which was established to facilitate the work of clinical psychologists, believes homosexuality is not a disorder and has no problems giving a written statement to that effect. "If I asked to do so, I will have no problems doing so," she says.

Gays also face other problems, namely, harassment under section 377 of the Indian Penal code, which prohibits any "carnal intercourse against the order of nature." Rohit (name changed), a gay, says he was once picked up by a policemen in plain clothes. "He told me his wife and kids were not home, When I saw his uniform hanging there, I was scared, But, he forced me, threatening me with section 377." Also raising a voice are the kotis, the ‘female’ partners in gay couples. A Delhi-based organisation, who will take up their cause, says, "They look up to the man who abuses them physically and mentally." "It will be soon a war of economics, with only the affluent ones being able to take care of themselves." About time for society at large to lend a ear! INAV

A minority in disarray

By Sarvadaman

Toynbee's 'A study of History' must be introduced at College level if students want to know the spirit of history. Toynbee was one of the greatest historians of the present times. His remarkable fascination with civilizations of the world led him to undertake one of the most difficult projects to study various civilizations; their birth, growth and decline. Finally he came to the conclusion that it is the creative minority which is the be-all and end-all of civilizations. At the stage of ascendency, creative minority is able to lead majority in proper direction. No questions are asked as no illusions are there. This creative minority freed India of foreign yoke. Mahatama Gandhi and Patel were men of vision. Their eyes were set on distant goals not immediate gains. Thus one became Father of the Nation and the other consolidator. Both have achieved immortality.

Coming to present times, there is not a single man or woman whom majority loves, and respects or is willing even to listen. This view can be corroborated by events in Eastern Region of India. Central Govt's ceasefire with Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) even outside Nagaland created volatile situation there. This thoughtless policy put in action without taking any Chief Minister into confidence, reveals the bankruptcy of the art of governance.

In ancient India the princes were placed under competent teachers to learn the art of ruling. Numerous examples were cited to derive home the reality of politics. Mahabharata, Arthshastra and Panchatantra formed compulsory courses of study. No doubt a rulersown I. Q played a major part in upbringing. For example both Kaurvas and Pandavas studies under Saint Dronacharya but each chose one's own path. But now any ABC can claim to lead this nation of one billion peoples. So where does the differences lie. The majority, which appears to have gone dumb except when shouting slogans. And who are the members of the creative minority? No need to highlight their names which would be reduced to foot notes of history. These so called the leader's are adept at hoodwinking their own countrymen. They change their statements with such speed that there remains nothing. Their policies and programmes are bereft of any long term gains. These leaders live by hours and the people of India appear to be a huge mass of people without any direction. Toynbee refers to this stage as the most dangerous one leading to the fall of civilizations. Both creative minority and majority drift apart. The former is selfish, short sighted and lacks character. Thus there is total absence of any inspiration and the majority, also selfish, self centred and seeped in luxury, does not bother to listen to any one. In such a stage of inertia four type of leaders emerge. Those who want to stem the rot through wise counsil but fail, second, those who desire to change through force. Third group tries violence i.e by sword and the last one comprises of people who are sincere but helpless and they withdraw.

Anyone reading this article can draw their own conclusion as to at what stage we have reached. Those who are honest, sincere are the big sufferers. The shrewd, cunning are applauded while wise are tortured. The patriotic are sidelined, the destabilizers are well looked after, the dunce are at the forefront and the intelligent pushed to the sidelines. Kalhana, the celebrated historian of Kashmir, must have felt sad when he wrote about his contemporaries that in the reign of some medieval kings, the Vagabond, Croks and cheats had monopolised the levers of Government while the scholars had been begging on the streets. And another Kashmir historian, Jonaraja has penned four verses, yes only four verses about a ruler named Bopadev. And just hold your breath, this ruler ruled Kashmir for ten long years, So you would think why his long history has been said only in four verses. It is because two verses refer to his extreme low intellect. For example this king, on his coronation day, felt very sad to see small pebbles and big boulders. He ordered that small stones might be fed with milk to grow into big stones. In the fourth verse the great historian asked his readers to forgive him to end the narration as his ink was becoming dirtier.

No one among the one billion people is asking as what dramatic change has occured which forced BJP Leaders to invite Parvez Musharraf for talks. For long these leaders were shouting that till cross border terrorism was not stopped no talks could be held. One of the many qualities of a leader is that one should be consistent. Pervez Musharraf is shrewd man. He would come prepared with full confidence as the Pakistani leaders always do their home work with perfection. Indian leaders could have appealed to his emotions and demanded freedom for prisoners of war held in Pak Jails since 1965, 1971 Wars. And chances where Musharaff would have listened as his most fervent wish had been fulfilled. His humane side might have triumphed a while but who cares for those who die for country. Look at the knee jerk reaction at the most barbaric treatment of Bangladeshi Soldiers with our BSF Jawans. And contrast this with China's reaction over losing just, yes, just one pilot and that too in mid air collision. With American plane. American President had to face China's outburst. This is how leaders lead the nation and make them assertive, bold and proud. China is not still in a position to challenge the American might but pride is cardinal aspect of their character which has been their driving force.

We have democracy, elected representatives, alert media and watchful judiciary. Yet where lie the shortcoming. Perhaps you and I need not stress our brains why! because Miss J Jayalalitha has laid bare the holes in our system. Her example shows that power directly affects the mind and body and under its intoxication, one gets blurred vision, and gets easily transformed into another realm. And like the French emperor Louis XIVth, one starts muttering ''I AM THE STATE''

North East: A time bomb

By Maj Gen V K Madhok (retired)

Absence of statesmenship and political will have resulted in postponment of one crucial political decision after the other in India's Northeast (NE). Boundaries, authority and scope of Bodo Autonomous Council in relation to Assam have yet to be resolved, which will be even more difficult with a Congress Government in power in Guwahati which may not heed Centre's dictat.

As regards the latest turmoil in Manipur after the cease fire agreement with the NSCN (IM); Assam, Tripura and Manipur are up in arms. Their Chief Ministers were not consulted about the extension of cease fire to Nagas outside Nagaland before signing the deal on Jun 4,2001. Besides, once again there has been an intelligence failure to forecast likely repurcussions by the States and their citizens to such unpleasant policies. In addition, foreign interests (specially arms exporters), a colonial attitude of "we and they" and inept media reporting leading to the resultant isolation of seven NE States are factors, which have led to the present faux pau.

In the latest tragedy, the chief players happen to be: The Governor, Mr Ved Marwah an ex Police Officer, Mr Padmanabhiah - reemployed bureaucrat, ex Home Secretary who has sufficient experience of Governance and who was Centre's emissary who negotiated the cease fire with the NSCN (IM) and recommended that cease fire be made applicable to Nagas outside Nagaland as well. While giving credit to this officers for handling the situation in Manipur, Marwah says that he was not consulted. On the other hand Padmanabhiah justies the deal by arguing that it was arrived at to create a suitable environment for peace talks. Obviously, both cannot get away with these statements. Nor can the Home Minister - the final authority who accepted recommendations and issued orders for enforcement of the cease fire.

The situation in the NE today is: That a large number of nearly four lac Nagas - citizens of Manipur, have fled their home State for safer pastures. That nearly a dozen odd Para Military Forces (PMF) like the ITBP, CRPF, CISF, RPF, Assam Rifles, India Reserve Battalions, DSC, Armed Police, Rapid Reaction forces and more than half a dozen intelligence outfits, in addition to approximately six lac troops including TA and the IAF are busy fighting the ongoing secessionist movements like the Bodos, ULFA, NLFT, NSCN, PLA of Manipur and so on. Or gaurding the border, with Gorkhaland and Greater Nepal movements waiting in the wings. Rightly, the arms merchants have seen a window of opportunity and as such are fuelling the fires of discontent and thus have made NE as the most flourishing arms market in the world. This does not end here. Because arms require replacements, spares and the insurgents need newer technologies and latest weaponary. And with India's indigenous programmes in the dumps the arms dealers have a field day. They will make every effort that the situation worsens instead of improving. They don't want their arms factories to close down.

Besides, the Home Minister and the Prime Minister are hesitant to review the cease fire agreement. Their fears, which are genuine, are that if the agreement is altered the NSCN (IM) will resort to violence and there will be no agreements in the future. If no action is taken, the People's Liberation Army of Manipur and All Manipur Students Union will continue to boycott the Government and not let it function. The Centre as such has got itself in a major fix my mishandling the situations.

This situation has been fully exploited by Pakistan's ISI who have been actively involved in assisting and coordinating actions of various movements to achieve their interests. Thus, bent on creating a political platform -like the Hurriyat in J&K, initially to be launched from Pakistan's embassy in Kathmandu and which will include all the seven NE States, it is successfully moving towards instigating a second proxy war-with bases in Bangladesh, Myanmar, Bhutan and Nepal.

What needs to be done? It appears that the Government has no option but to review the deal and delete the extension clause besides giving it in writing, that there will be no alteration of State boundries. And for once, admit the failure in not consulting the Chief Ministers of the affected States (Assam, Manipur and Tripura). Further, two posts of Deputy Home Ministers, one each for dealing with NE and J&K respectively, should be created. The Home Minister is too busy. Further, he cannot depend on solutions recommended by bureaucrats. The Deputy Ministers should preferably function from Guwahati and Kashmir respectively. In addition, the moribund National Integration Council needs to be revived. And there is no reason as to why the PM's office cannot function for short periods from Guwahati if it could do so from the Breach Candy Hospital. Further, an accountable Unified Command needs to be set up while the political process moves on.

The NE needs a political solution. The more it is delayed it would become more difficult and complex. The security forces and the bureaucrats cannot resolve the situation. They are merely tools in the hands of the Government. Finally the message is loud and clear: Should the secessionists succeed in waging a second proxy war with ISI's help, China postured in the background, with bases in the neighbouring countries, the proxy war in J&K will look like a child's play. It will present a scenario where the Government will be kept busy at its flanks. The Government will not be able to deal with the situation and therefore, that will be the first visible signs as well as steps towards disintegration of the Indian State.

 



|
home | state | national | business | editorial | advertisement | sports |
|
international | weather | mailbag | suggestions | search |
subscribe | send mail |

timer