Mail

Reservation Rules

Sir,

The Chief Minister Dr Farooq Abdullah while addressing a large congregation held in observance of 644th Jayanth of Sri Guru Ravi Dass Ji (DE February 9, 2001) asserted that his Government is committed to provide equal opportunities of progress to all and nobody should nurture the impression of being subjected to injustice. In this connection, it is submitted that the Apex Court in its historical judgement dated 16.11.1992 in a case Indra Sawhney V/s Union of India on Mandal Commission Report has asked the Central and State Governments for implementation of 27 percent reservation in Government jobs which they have implemented at the same time but our State Government has provided only 2 percent reservation to the people of this category consisting of 63 most backward castes (Muslim and Hindus) which comprises 60 percent of the population of the State and rest of 25 percent given to backward area etc. which is not covered by the above said judgement of the Apex Court. These people want to know from the Chief Minister who is accountable for this injustice, and when this mistake is committed, will he set it right as more than eight years of time has already passed after the judgement of the Apex Court.

Yours etc...
B. L Balwal
Udhampur

Consolidation of Pension

Sir,

Against the faulty implementation of Central Govt pension liberalisation formula/scheme introduced during 1981-82 providing 50% pension on first 1000, 45% on next 500 and 40% on the remaining portion, if any, of one months average pay emoluments extending benefits of the ibid scheme to pre date retirees and denial thereof to the post date retirees on a WP No. 5939-41/82 titled DS Nakara and others V/s Union of India the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a land mark judgement/Ruling dated 17-12-1982 held that all pensioners irrespective of their date of retirement from -A-Class to get the revised pensionery benefit. Thus controversial issue of pre and post date of retirement stands eliminated/solved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court ibid Ruling published in law journal as (AIR 1983 SC-130) also refers for reference and guidance.

The J&K State Govt also introduced ibid scheme in the State to benefit State pensionery/family pensioners vide SRO 586 dated 23.10.1979 operative from 1-4-1979 to 31-3-1987. However in implementing the said scheme/formula the same controversy of pre and post date of retirement erupted. The aggrieved State pensioners also filed WP No. 934-35/1984 titled Avtar Krishan Mengi & others V/s J&K State which was accepted by the single bench of Hon'ble High Court Jammu on 13-9-1984 with reference to the ibid Ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 17.12.1982 holding all pensioners irrespective of their date of retirement as one class to get revised pensionery benefits. The ibid Judgement was upheld by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 18.12.84 dismissing State LPA No. 37-38. The said Judgement was further/finally upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court with dismissal of State special level petition No. 958-59 on 15.3.1985. The above verdict of the Hon'ble J&K State High Court and Supreme Court Ruling 15.3.85 and earlier Rulings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court New Delhi "AIR-1983-SC-130" was Rubicon to the State Govt not to issue any such discriminatory order, but order No. 93-F dated 1-4-1988 effective from 1.4.87 relating to the consolidation of pension/family pensions of retirees pre 1.4.87 No. Rev (B) 255 of 1987 dated 17.8.1987 and order No. 218-GR(EP) of 1990 dated 22.11-1990 relating to upgradation of existing 14 posts of Supdts in 14 Dy. Commissioners offices in the State and Field Inspectors of EP Deptt from 600-925 to 1550-2250 and Govt order No. 275-F dt. 14.10.98 which provides reconstitution of pension in term of para 2 (V) of ibid order in disadvantage of pensioners as pensions already stand consolidated in term of para (3) of Govt order No. 46-F dated 19.1.98 w.e.f. 1.1.96 instead of inclusion being added to 50% pension worked on National pay basis in the pension already consolidated on the analogy of para 4 @5 of Govt order 275-F dated 14.10.98 relating to family pension which are in utter violation of Hon'ble Supreme Court ibid Ruling in dividing the one class pensioners into two in paying them revised pensionery benefits.

It appears that pension have been fixed earlier either on the basis of old State system or with the difference of pre & post date of retirement. It further reveals, that, Finance Department has not apprised the Accountant General's office of the Ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court New Delhi and verdict of the Hon'ble State High Court Jammu as mentioned above. However, after the Ruling of Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Court Jammu pensions of retirees on or after 31.3.1985 to 1986 were to be fixed in strict conformity of prov. of SRO-586 dt. 23.10.1979 on the basis of one months average pay emoluments of Rs. 1446/-for 30 years qualifying service. But pension fixed by the Acct. General's office is much less.

The proper procedure for consolidation of pension of retirees on or after 31.3.85 to 1986 was as laid down in Sub-para (C-i) C-ii) and (c-iii) of para C and para (e) of Govt order No. 93-F dated 1.4.88 effective from 1.4.1987 with addition of 5% ADA as addl. relief on all categories of pension in term of para (C) of Govt order No. 47-GR/F dated 21.4.1986.

We, therefore, requested the Government to look into the matter.

Yours etc...
Brij Lal
General Secretary
350 Dalpatian
Pirmitha Jammu

 
 
timer