|
| Ban wont affect LeT, JeM From B L Kak NEW DELHI, Dec 27: The United States, considered as the worlds super cop, has, at last, found it necessary to please New Delhi by branding the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) . ...more Congress
cautions BANGALORE, Dec 27:The Congress today cautioned the Government that war with Pakistan "is a serious business" and expressed concern that some members of Government were "talking lightly"....more 2001
was a mixed BANGALORE, Dec 27: It was a mixed bag for Karnataka with advances in information technology, biotechnology and agriculture being counterbalanced ......more Marandi
urges RANCHI, Dec 27: Jharkhand Chief Minister Babulal Marandi has urged the Centre to initiate immediate steps to demolish the "Pakistan-sponsored" .....more |
|
RLD president quits NEW DELHI, Dec 27: Union Minister Ajit Singh led Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) today sufferred a setback with the party president Jainendra Kumar resigning from the party along with his supporters and joined Janata Dal (S) led by former Prime Minister H D Deve Gowda. .....more 2001
was year of MUMBAI, Dec 27: The year 2001 will be remembered by the workforce in the country as the year of voluntary retirement. ...more AP
Govt has open mind HYDERABAD, Dec 27: The Andhra Pradesh Government has an open mind on holding a dialogue with the Naxalites in a bid to ......more BJP didnt start Ayodhya movement, says Advani NEW DELHI, Dec 27: Union Home Minister L K Advani today denied that the Ayodhya movement was started by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)......more |
NEWS
ANALYSIS From B L Kak NEW DELHI, Dec 27: The United States, considered as the worlds super cop, has, at last, found it necessary to please New Delhi by branding the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) as terrorist outfits. Washingtons announcement, in this regard, surfaced two days after Pakistan announced the freeze on the assets of Lashkar. Do these measures mean anything so far as India and the menace of terrorism it is facing is concerned? They mean nothing, considering the fact that the Lashkar-e-Toiba had already got a new face, a new name, while the Jaish-e-Mohammed changed its name in October this year. Just like some other similar organisations in the past. Observers havent forgotten the development which followed the US ban on the Harkat-ul-Ansar more than two years ago. The ban, in fact, was followed by the announcement of the existence of Harkat-ul-Mujahideen in place of Harkat-ul-Ansar. Activities of the outfits cadre havent suffered in any way since then. And the outfit continues to function effectively since then, using its cadres to strike terror in Jammu and Kashmir unchecked and unhampered by legalities and bans. The Jaish-e-Mohammed leadership in Pakistan withdrew all the money from bank accounts and reopened these under names of individual members in anticipation of the US decision to freeze assets of what is now the old and reportedly non-existent outfit. Indeed, a spokesperson of the organisation was quoted as having told a news conference in Islamabad recently: "We have already withdrawn our money from the bank accounts and reopened them in the name of our low-profile supporters". Is it true that JeM changed its name a day after a meeting between the jihadi leaders and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee in Pakistan, Gen. Mohammed Aziz, on October 10? That the LeT will continue to survive and carry out its terrorist and subversive activities against India is something that Prof. Hafiz Mohammed Saeed himself made clear prior to the appointment of Abdul Wahid, a lesser known Kashmiri militant, as the new chief of the organisation. Prof. Saeeds significant announcement: "Lashkars activities will now be totally confined to Kashmir and we have already shifted all our offices to Kashmir last month". That the move was at the behest of Islamabad is also quite apparent from Prof. Saeeds statement that he had decided to step down "to save Pakistan from the malicious Indian propaganda". It was as if the Lashkar supremo was speaking in the voice of the military regime of Gen. Parvez Musharraf. Shortly after the announcement, a former Indian High Commissioner to Islamabad, Mr G Parthasarathy, made it apparent that the move did not impress India and mere change of name or quitting by its chief was not enough. He termed the entire development as an Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) gameplan to fool India into complacency, warning that New Delhi should not be taken in by the tactic and should crack down on the terrorist outfits. The terrorists, Mr Parthasarathy chose to emphasize, havent vanished in thin air; they are still very much in Pakistan and India would have to take tough action to eliminate them. And that, frankly, is the key. The terrorists who form the core of the LeT as well JeM have not surrendered. Nor have they been eliminated. And Prof. Saeed himself did concede that they are in Kashmir, very much active. And, notwithstanding Islamabads denial, very much backed by the ISI. Some media reports from America have, in recent days, sought to highlight Washingtons unpublished message to Gen. Musharraf to abandon the armed struggle in Kashmir. If these reports were to be believed, the Bush Administration wants Pakistan to give up aiding and abetting militants and insurgents in Kashmir and to rely henceforth on political means of confronting India. Will Islamabad oblige the US by giving up its support to what it has often described as "freedom struggle in Kashmir"? This is an issue which is much closer to the hearts of most people in Pakistan than the survival of the Taliban. This is something that New Delhi will have to keep in mind whatever steps it takes now to deal with the emerging situation and the build-up of tension with Islamabad. One wrong step, and India could easily lose the advangate it now has vis-a-vis Pakistan. |
Congress cautions Govt against war with Pak BANGALORE, Dec 27: The Congress today cautioned the Government that war with Pakistan "is a serious business" and expressed concern that some members of Government were "talking lightly" of going to war. "War is a serious business....One has to go to war only when one cant help it. One should not talk lightly of going to war", senior Congress leader and leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha Dr Manmohan Singh told reporters here. Singh said the Congress was worried that some members of the Government were talking "very lightly" of going to war. "Our economy has resilience. But the way people talk about war, it frightens me...One should not talk lightly about war....That is not to say that I am creating panic that if a war is forced on the country we are not strong enough", he said. Asked if those members of Government were talking about war with an eye on the coming Uttar Pradesh elections, the former Finance Minister said he did not want to attribute motives. On Finance Minister Yashwant Sinhas statement that the defence budget would be enhanced, if necessary, Singh charged that the Defence Ministry was not even able to spend what it got during Kargil war. "They got special allocation and I think normal restrictions were relaxed. But none of the money was spent on things meant for Kargil", he said. Singh indicated opposition to withdrawing MFN status to Pakistan, saying it would only be symbolic and also hurt the Indian people. He noted that Pakistan did not give MFN status to India. Asked if the water treaty with Pakistan should be abrogated, Singh said these were serious decisions, about which one ought not to speak in newspapers. "Those who do so should seriously analyse its onsequences", he added. Asked if the Congress would back any Government action against Pakistan, he said the party had already said there was no difference of opinion and it was one with the Government that efforts should be made, preferably through diplomatic moves, to persuade Pakistan to stop cross-border terrorism. Referring to recall of the Indian High Commissioner in Pakistan, Singh said "no doubt, we need to take some action". (PTI) |
2001 was a mixed bag for Karnataka BANGALORE, Dec 27: It was a mixed bag for Karnataka with advances in information technology, biotechnology and agriculture being counterbalanced by setbacks from drought, a fair share of controversies and the adverse impact of the WTC terrorist attack in the us on software companies here. On the political front, while hosting of the AICC plenary session was an additional feather in the cap of the Krishna Government, the much-hyped initiatives for the JD(U)-JD (S) merger seemed to have hardly moved forward with leadership of both parties blowing hot and cold. IT and biotech continued to be in focus with the state consolidating its position as the it capital of the country even as it provided the much needed fillip to the agricultural sector through its "milleniun bio-tech policy". In its vision to carve a niche for itself in the global economic scenario, the Congress Government under the leadership of S M Krishna adopted the credo "think global and act global". Double-pronged strategy seemed to be the catchword, improving agricultural productivity through biotechnology while attracting further investments for the state from global pharmaceutical and health sciences companies. While a institute of bio-informatics and applied bio-technology here has been doing excellent work, the Government also announced the setting up of an Agri-biotech Institute in Dharwad, marine bio-tech park in Karwar and a Gene Bank in association with Bangalore University. The issue of establishing a bio-tech park in University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS) campus here generated much heat among the faculty members, scientists and students, resulting in a volatile situation, wherein the Government had to impose Section 144 of the CrPC in the campus. Yielding to pressure not only from the faculty members and the students but also the opposition which added fuel to the fire, the Government decided to locate the park away from the UAS campus. The location however, still remains undecided. The heat of the WTC terrorist attacks in the US was felt in Karnataka also with several software companies downgrading their revenue and growth outlook as much of the it business is generated from America. The companies are now looking towards Europe also with more interest for their business. However, the initial negative sentiments caused by the September 11 terrorist attacks and the hi-tech meltdown are gradually giving way to cautious optimism among the IT giants who say Indian software industry is resilient and its annual growth rate of 25 per cent "is reasonably good". Indian IT industry could look forward to better days ahead, the experts say. Reports of China-headquartered Huawei which has its office in Bangalore, being allegedly involved in helping Pakistan and the Taliban regime in telecom surveillance came as a shock to the IT industry here. However, the company issued a strong denial saying "its unthinkable for the company to get involved with an unlawful regime" and terming the reports "totally untrue and utterly baseless". (PTI) |
|
|
AP Govt has open mind on holding talks with Naxals: Home Minister HYDERABAD, Dec 27: The Andhra Pradesh Government has an open mind on holding a dialogue with the Naxalites in a bid to resolve the extremist menace, Home Minister T Devender Goud told the State Assembly today. He said Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu would hold an all-party meeting soon to work out the modalities for talks with the extremists. A decision to this effect was taken at a recent cabinet meeting, he informed. The minister was responding to a special mention on the issue by Telangana Rashtra Samithi president K Chandrasekhar Rao. Reiterating the Governments appeal to the Naxalites to join the mainstream life, Mr Goud said no problem could be resolved without dialogue, adding "we are not rigid and are ready for talks". He said as a result of the mindless violence, many innocent people have been killed and substantial Government and private properties damaged. "Violence cannot solve any problem". In his special mention, Mr Rao said a senior functionary of the central committee of the banned Peoples War Group of Naxalites had announced that the outfit was ready to hold discussions with the Government if the latter stopped police encounters. Mr Rao said there were any number of examples, both within and outside the country, of extremism being resolved through negotiations. "In our own country, the authorities were holding talks with the Naga extremist groups", he pointed out. He said the State Government should adopt an open mind for talks with the PWG, which had offered to negotiate for the first time in the last two decades. He also demanded that the Government should stop the armed action against the Naxals to create a congenial atmosphere for the talks. Mr D Srinivas (Congress) said the Naxalite offer for talks was a positive sign and the Government should come forward to hold negotiations with them. Mr Asaddudin Owaisi (Majlis) said an atmosphere of trust should be created between the Government and the PWG as a prelude to the dialogue. Mr N Indrasena Reddy (BJP), who had once opposed the talks, also favoured dialogue with the extremists. Mr N Narasimiah (CPI-M) said the Government, without wasting any time, should convene talks with the extremist groups. "The whole Naxalite problem should be viewed as a socio-economic problem." Earlier, the Congress, in a letter to the Chief Minister, had urged the Government to start an unconditional dialogue with the Naxalites to put an end to the violence in the state. (UNI) |
BJP didnt start Ayodhya movement, says Advani NEW DELHI, Dec 27: Union Home Minister L K Advani today denied that the Ayodhya movement was started by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rath Yatra launched by him in 1989 led to communal disturbances in the country. Deposing before the Liberhan Commission, probing the 1992 demolition of the Babri Mosque, Mr Advani said neither did the BJP start the movement nor was it associated with it till 1989 when he launched the Rath Yatra. "So much so that when the formal foundation of the Ram Temple was laid, even at that time the BJP was not associated with it. It was the Rajiv Gandhi Government which facilitated the foundation laying ceremony," the Home Minister said while being examined by All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) counsel Yusuf H Muchhala. The AIMPLB counsel had asked him as to whether he and his party did not assess the possible impact of the movement on the psyche of the Muslim community. "We came into the picture in 1989, when the first major programme was undertaken by my party and I as its president led the Rath Yatra from Somnath to Ayodhya," Mr Advani said. He also denied that the Rath Yatra had led to communal disturbances in the country. "And even though the Rath Yatra was subsequently accused of creating riots, I felt fully satisfied that the manner in which we conducted the Yatra, there was no single untoward incident connected with it." Mr Advani further said: Had it not been for the December six demolition, no Hindu-Muslim clashes would have taken place. With regard to the December six incident, he said: I have very candidly and openly said that I regard that incident as very wrong. I regard demolition as a great setback to the BJPs movement. To another question, the Home Minister also denied that the BJP had associated itself with the Ayodhya movement with an obejective of creating a Hindu votebank. He said it was impossible to create a Hindu votebank as the Hindu Society was not monolithic. Unlike other religions there is no one prophet or no one book to command the allegiance of the entire society. (UNI) |
||
|
||
| home | state | national | business| editorial | advertisement | sports | |