|
| India will crush terrorism: George From B L Kak NEW DELHI, Dec 12: The Defence Minister, Mr George Fernandes, has declared that India.....more Thackeray assails Pawars compromising politics MUMBAI, Dec 12: Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray has sharply criticised NCP president Sharad Pawar ...more JAIPUR, Dec 12: A ban or restriction on the movement of Goondas is violative of their rights to life and residence guaranteed under the...more CPM
activists take out VIJAYAWADA, Dec 12: More than 100 activists of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) CPI (M) took out a mock-funeral procession today with a......more |
|
Oppn intensifies campaign for ouster of Fernandes NEW DELHI, Dec 12: Confrontation is building up in Parliament between the Government and a determined opposition,...more Maratha
strongman MUMBAI, Dec 12: The 61st birthday celebrations of Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) supremo Sharad Pawar started this morning with the former...more Parliament committee suggests exclusion of Governors from NEC NEW DELHI, Dec 12: A Parliamentary Committee has unanimously recommended exclusion of Governors.......more For
them, Eid in exile, NEW DELHI, Dec 12: Several of Pakistans top politicians, including two former Prime Ministers, will celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr this year in exile, and .....more |
India will crush terrorism: George From B L Kak NEW DELHI, Dec 12: The Defence Minister, Mr George Fernandes, has declared that India has the "resolve, strength and stamina" to resist terrorism until it is decisively crushed. In his forthright statement against Islamabads policy of sponsoring cross-border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of India, Mr George Fernandes informed the Rajya Sabha that Pakistan has established a large infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) for recruitment, training and indoctrination of terrorists. Replying to a question by Mr Prem Chand Gupta, Mr Fernandes stated that the Government had appropriately and effectively brought to the attention of the international community the facts pertaining to Pakistans sponsorship of cross-border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of India. The matter, he said, had also been raised during high level discussions with world leaders. The Defence Minister made it clear that no separate budget provision had been made for resettlement of widows of Kargil martyrs. He informed Mr Rama Shanker Kaushik that as a measure of rehabilitation of widows or next of kin of Kargil martyrs, the Government has paid them ex-gratia amount of Rs 10 lakhs each. The widows of Kargil martyrs have also been given an amount of Rs 5 lakhs for housing and Rs 1 lakh per child or Rs 2 lakhs per family for education of children from the National Defence Fund. On measures to defend the bordering areas along Myanmar, Bangladesh and Bhutan, the Defence Minister told Mr W Angou Singh that the Government of India remained vigilant and has taken all necessary and appropriate steps to safeguard the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of India. He also made it clear that there was no proposal to exchange prisoners between India and Myanmar. He pointed out that while there has been an upswing in the relations between India and Myanmar in recent year, the construction of Tamu-Kalemyo-Kalewa road was likely to give further impetus to it. Regretting that Pakistan had never acknowledged the presence of any Indian prisoner of war (POW) in its custody, Mr Geroge Fernandes said that as many as 54 Indian POWs were believed to be in Pakistani jails. Answering a question by Mr PK Maheshwari, Mr Fernandes said that New Delhi had consistently taken up the issue of their release and repatriation with the Government of Pakistan at all levels. The Defence Minister recalled that his Prime Minister, Mr Atal Behari Vajpayee, had, during the Agra summit on July 15 last, urged the Pakistani President, Gen. Parvez Musharraf, to take urgent and purposeful action towards the release of these POWs. Following the Agra summit, the Pak Government reportedly conducted another search for Indian POWs, but again reiterated that there was no Indian POW in Pakistani jails, he said and added that New Delhi would continue to take up this issue with Islamabad. Is the Government contemplating to sound a high alert in all ordnance factories in the country in view of the prevailing situation? Answering this question by Mr Bachani Lekhraj, Mr Fernandes pointed out that being vital defence production units, security in ordnance factories was tight even in normal circumstances. The Defence Minister explained that the degree of alertness "does vary" depending upon assessments of the prevailing situation. And he admitted that alertness had been heightened because of the present situation. |
Thackeray assails Pawars compromising politics MUMBAI, Dec 12: Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray has sharply criticised NCP president Sharad Pawar, who is celebrating his 61st birthday today, accusing him of adopting double standards and claiming that he had failed to make his mark in national politics despite having calibre. Thackerays observations about Pawar appeared in todays editorial of his party mouthpiece Saamna even as political leaders of every hue from across the nation are expected to converge at the sprawling Mahalaxmi Turf Club here this evening to greet the Maratha strongman. Pawars past clearly establishes his double standards and, he, despite having calibre and capacity, has failed to make a mark in national politics, the editorial said. As an opposition leader Pawar had excellent rapport with him, Thackeray recalled in the editoral and said he had shared the dais with the latter. The Sena chief also recounted the day when Pawar had attended the first public meeting held to announce the formation of Shiv Sena. Pawar, while floating his NCP two years ago, had vowed to remain equidistant from BJP and Congress, the editorial reminded. However, it said, the Maratha leader was sharing power with Congress in Maharashtra and was hobnobbing with the BJP. The Saamna editorial recounts Pawars on and off relationship with Congress, his showering praise on Sonia Gandhi in the initial days and later criticising her foreign origin. The editorial took a dig at Pawar, saying that birthday celebrations of national-level leaders assume country-wide significance if they are celebrated in national capital of New Delhi. Those who aspire to be national leaders should think of future and march ahead. But Pawar wants to be the Prime Minister and Chief Minister of Maharashtra at the same time, Thackrey remarked (UNI) |
|
JAIPUR, Dec 12: A ban or restriction on the movement of Goondas is violative of their rights to life and residence guaranteed under the constitution, the Rajasthan High Court has held. Sub-Section (3) of Section 3 of the Rajasthan Control of Goondas Act, 1975, gave arbitrary powers to District Magistrates and imposed unreasonable restrictions on persons defined as Goondas, a bench comprising Mr Justice Shiv Kumar Sharma and Mr Justice Anoop Chand Goyal of the court said. A closer look at the scheme of the act showed that the condition of Goondas was worse than that of prisoners, the judges said in their December 6 judgment, admitting an appeal against an order for the externment of two persons from Kota district of the state. The judges said Sub-Section (3) of Section 3 of the act was violative of Article 21 and Article 19(1)(D) and (E) of the Constitution which guarantees citizens the right to life and the right to move freely, reside and settle anywhere in the country. They said the act gave District Magistrates arbitrary powers to remove a person from one district to another. "The place selected by the District Magistrate may be one in which the person concerned may have no residential accommodation and no means of subsistence. It may not be possible for the person concerned to honestly secure the means of subsistence in the place selected... "The state or its officers in exercise of executive authority cannot infringe rights of citizens merely because the legislature of the state has power to legislate in regard to a subject on which executive order is passed," the court said. Under Sub-Section (3) of Section 3 of the act, District Magistrates are authorised to order a person to leave the district or desist from entering a district or its specified part until the expiry of a period not exceeding six months. The person might be asked to notify his movements and conduct himself as per the order. In their writ petitions, counsel for Devendra Jain and Satya Narain alias Sattu said the act took away not only the liberty of the person but also his resources of employment, his duties towards his family members and also put an immediate problem of shelter on his head. "In other words, it can be described as an economical death...The effect of such orders are higher than the regular imprisonment or preventive detentions," it was contended. The Government counsel argued that the act, promulgated for the control and suppression of goondas and maintainance of public order, was just, proper and was not unconstitutional. The judges cited supreme court judgements in the Chamelisingh vs. the state of UP case of 1996 and the state of MP Vs Thakur Bharat Singh (AIR, 1967) to stress that the basic human rights of citizens could not be taken away even though certain restrictions were allowed under Article 19(5) of the Constitution. Legislative order needs to have the quality of reasonableness and should strike a proper balance between freedom guaranteed in Article 19(1) and social control permitted in Clause(2) to (6) of Article 19, the judges stated. "In the case of externment or internment orders the citizens freedom of movement under Clause (D) of Article 19 is curtailed and therefore unless such curtailment is justifiable under Clause (5) it is ultra vires," they said. On a request from the Advocate General that suitable directions be issued to the state to redraft the provisions contained in Sub-Section(3) of Section 3 of the Act, the judges said it was not for the court to advise the state as to how the law may be redrafted so as to avoid conflict with the constitution. (UNI) |
|
|
Parliament committee
suggests exclusion NEW DELHI, Dec 12: A Parliamentary Committee has unanimously recommended exclusion of Governors and inclusion of at least one MP from each north-eastern state in the North Eastern Council (NEC), as part of its suggestions to amend the NEC Act. While "overwhelmingly" opposing the proposal to retain Governors as members of the nec, the standing committee of the Home Ministry felt there was need for inclusion of MPs from the states including Sikkim to broadbase NECs representative character. In its report tabled in Parliament today, the committee opined that it should be left to the Government to devise a mechanism to elect or nominate at least one MP each from the constituent states in consultapresiding officers of both Houses of Parliament. On the issue of Governors, the committee was "overwhelmingly of the view that only Chief Ministers of the states should continue to be the members (of the NEC) and the Governors should not be retained primarily because it meant duality of representation of the constituent states without any plausible rationale." The committee sought executive powers for the NEC to ensure better and timely implementation of various schemes and projects under it, besides the powers to review the implementation of the on-going projects, many of which were suffering cost and time over-runs because of their tardy execution. It also recommended inclusion of the Chief Executive members of autonomous district councils in the NEC saying it would lead to greater appreciation of developmental needs of these autonomous areas. After thorough deliberations, it also decided that the nec would not have any security-related matters in its mandate as the basic concept was to have the body function as a nodal agency for all-round development in the entire northeastern region. The standing committee felt it was essential to have state-specific projects or schemes so as to ensure balanced development of all of them in the region, the report added. (PTI) |
For them, Eid in exile, jails, under house detention NEW DELHI, Dec 12: Several of Pakistans top politicians, including two former Prime Ministers, will celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr this year in exile, and several others in jails or under house-detention, a leading Pakistani newspaper says. The news international yesterday published a list of several leading politicians in jail or living in exile. Topping the list are former Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif. Ms Bhutto, who is chairperson of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), lives in Dubai with her children and mother Nusrat Bhutto. Nawaz Sharif, president of Pakistan Muslim League (PML), lives in exile in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, along with his brother Shahbaz Sharif, a former Chief Minister of Punjab, and their families. The list includes Muttahida Qaumi Movement chief Altaf Hussain living in self-exile in London. The politicians who will celebrate Eid in prison include former Senator and Ms Bhuttos husband Asif Ali Zardari, former Health Minister and acting PML-(Nawaz group) president Makhdoom Javed Hashmi, former National Assembly Speaker Yousuf Raza Gilani, former Punjab Chief Minister Mian Manzoor Ahmad Wattoo and ex-Minister for Petroleum and National Resources and PPP secretary-general Jehangir Badar, the paper said. Amir Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Qazi Hussain Ahmad will celebrate eid under detention in Peshawar while Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (S) chief Maulana Samiul Haq, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rahman and JI Naib Amir Liaquat Baloch will celebrate Eid under house arrest, it said. (UNI) |
||
|
||
| home | state | national | business| editorial | advertisement | sports | |