![]() |
Simply superb Sir, Ms. Jyotshna Pandit's write up ''Getting to terms with feelings'' (dated 14.1.2000) is also related to the wonderful happenings with humans at all levels and in all directions. The write up is psychologically oriented and I have been impressed to read such a presentation outside psychological reading material. But I wish that for better common public consumption, the write ups of this nature may in future be broken into sub-heads like-fixing of feelings, emotional intelligence, managing feelings, acceptance or rejection of feelings etc. Write ups of this standard really speak about the care exercised by your enterprise to meet varied expectations of your readers, and as such the writer deserves a full pat along with the watchful publishers of the article. Feelings or emotions visit nearly every day, and how the writer briefly X-rays the whole issue to ensure wholeness, peace and happiness for one and all, is very commendable. Yours etc... |
Review some legal procedures Sir, It refers to the welcome ruling of the Supreme Court that a trial court may frame charges against an accused without recording reasons thereof. Honourable Court rightly observed that time has come to adopt all possible measures to expedite court procedures, and to find ways to avert all roadblocks causing avoidable delays. It is high time that various legal acts and procedures may be reviewed to quicken the present snail-paced proceedings specially in trial courts. It may be noted that many court-cases are filed only to postpone things. If steps are taken to make judiciary moving fast, then number of court cases will automatically be drastically reduced! Revised chapter XVII starting from section 138 was effective in The Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 from 01.04.1989 to check rising incidents of cheque-bouncing. But useless formalities of getting culprits punished under section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, make it very difficult, time-consuming and costly to get benefit out of this section. For instance, personal appearance of the complainant may not be necessary on each date. There is no sense in useless lengthy dates summoning first only the banks involved in non-clearing of the bounced cheque/s, when there are documentary-proofs like the cheque-return and debit memos issued by the banks, and the bounced cheque itself bearing clearing stamps of the banks. Procedure should be simple to issue summons directly to the accused person/s immediately on filing of the complaint for personal appearance of the accused, while complainant may be allowed to be represented through lawyer or attorney. Banks may be summoned only when court is not satisfied about validity of the bank documents filed with the complaint. Such simplicity will save time and cost of not only complainants but also of courts and concerned banks. Rather, there should be simple complaint-form which may have all necessary informations relating to cheque-bouncing. Also there may be a proforma for the mandatory notice to be sent to the accused giving final opportunity to pay for the bounced cheque, before filling of the actual complaint. Likewise other criminal/civil procedures and acts may be reviewed for ensuring justice in time with minimum cost. Yours etc.... |
|